These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

147 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28900182)

  • 1. Conservation performance of different conservation governance regimes in the Peruvian Amazon.
    Schleicher J; Peres CA; Amano T; Llactayo W; Leader-Williams N
    Sci Rep; 2017 Sep; 7(1):11318. PubMed ID: 28900182
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Effects of national forest-management regimes on unprotected forests of the Himalaya.
    Brandt JS; Allendorf T; Radeloff V; Brooks J
    Conserv Biol; 2017 Dec; 31(6):1271-1282. PubMed ID: 28295561
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Conservation Beyond Park Boundaries: The Impact of Buffer Zones on Deforestation and Mining Concessions in the Peruvian Amazon.
    Weisse MJ; Naughton-Treves LC
    Environ Manage; 2016 Aug; 58(2):297-311. PubMed ID: 27179802
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Socio-economic and environmental trade-offs in Amazonian protected areas and Indigenous territories revealed by assessing competing land uses.
    den Braber B; Oldekop JA; Devenish K; Godar J; Nolte C; Schmoeller M; Evans KL
    Nat Ecol Evol; 2024 Jul; ():. PubMed ID: 39009851
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Creating Protected Areas on Public Lands: Is There Room for Additional Conservation?
    Arriagada RA; Echeverria CM; Moya DE
    PLoS One; 2016; 11(2):e0148094. PubMed ID: 26848856
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Protected area types, strategies and impacts in Brazil's Amazon: public protected area strategies do not yield a consistent ranking of protected area types by impact.
    Pfaff A; Robalino J; Sandoval C; Herrera D
    Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci; 2015 Nov; 370(1681):. PubMed ID: 26460126
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Impacts of protected areas vary with the level of government: Comparing avoided deforestation across agencies in the Brazilian Amazon.
    Herrera D; Pfaff A; Robalino J
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2019 Jul; 116(30):14916-14925. PubMed ID: 31285315
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Untangling the proximate causes and underlying drivers of deforestation and forest degradation in Myanmar.
    Lim CL; Prescott GW; De Alban JDT; Ziegler AD; Webb EL
    Conserv Biol; 2017 Dec; 31(6):1362-1372. PubMed ID: 28856773
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Land-use allocation protects the Peruvian Amazon.
    Oliveira PJ; Asner GP; Knapp DE; Almeyda A; Galván-Gildemeister R; Keene S; Raybin RF; Smith RC
    Science; 2007 Aug; 317(5842):1233-6. PubMed ID: 17690260
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Governance regime and location influence avoided deforestation success of protected areas in the Brazilian Amazon.
    Nolte C; Agrawal A; Silvius KM; Soares-Filho BS
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2013 Mar; 110(13):4956-61. PubMed ID: 23479648
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The effectiveness of contrasting protected areas in preventing deforestation in Madre de Dios, Peru.
    Vuohelainen AJ; Coad L; Marthews TR; Malhi Y; Killeen TJ
    Environ Manage; 2012 Oct; 50(4):645-63. PubMed ID: 22814545
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Role of Brazilian Amazon protected areas in climate change mitigation.
    Soares-Filho B; Moutinho P; Nepstad D; Anderson A; Rodrigues H; Garcia R; Dietzsch L; Merry F; Bowman M; Hissa L; Silvestrini R; Maretti C
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2010 Jun; 107(24):10821-6. PubMed ID: 20505122
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Impact of mining activities on areas of environmental protection in the southwest of the Amazon: A GIS- and remote sensing-based assessment.
    Rudke AP; Sikora de Souza VA; Santos AMD; Freitas Xavier AC; Rotunno Filho OC; Martins JA
    J Environ Manage; 2020 Jun; 263():110392. PubMed ID: 32174531
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Land tenure drives Brazil's deforestation rates across socio-environmental contexts.
    Pacheco A; Meyer C
    Nat Commun; 2022 Oct; 13(1):5759. PubMed ID: 36182932
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Global drivers of mangrove loss in protected areas.
    Heck N; Goldberg L; Andradi-Brown DA; Campbell A; Narayan S; Ahmadia GN; Lagomasino D
    Conserv Biol; 2024 May; ():e14293. PubMed ID: 38766900
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Impacts of nonstate, market-driven governance on Chilean forests.
    Heilmayr R; Lambin EF
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2016 Mar; 113(11):2910-5. PubMed ID: 26929349
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Who owns the Brazilian carbon?
    Freitas FLM; Englund O; Sparovek G; Berndes G; Guidotti V; Pinto LFG; Mörtberg U
    Glob Chang Biol; 2018 May; 24(5):2129-2142. PubMed ID: 29215789
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Effectiveness of China's protected areas in reducing deforestation.
    Yang H; Viña A; Winkler JA; Chung MG; Dou Y; Wang F; Zhang J; Tang Y; Connor T; Zhao Z; Liu J
    Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2019 Jun; 26(18):18651-18661. PubMed ID: 31055756
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Are indigenous territories effective natural climate solutions? A neotropical analysis using matching methods and geographic discontinuity designs.
    Alejo C; Meyer C; Walker WS; Gorelik SR; Josse C; Aragon-Osejo JL; Rios S; Augusto C; Llanos A; Coomes OT; Potvin C
    PLoS One; 2021; 16(7):e0245110. PubMed ID: 34252100
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Land-use conflicts between biodiversity conservation and extractive industries in the Peruvian Andes.
    Bax V; Francesconi W; Delgado A
    J Environ Manage; 2019 Feb; 232():1028-1036. PubMed ID: 33395755
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.