1132 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28901342)
1. [The recognition of peer reviewers activity: the potential promotion of a virtuous circle.].
Pierno A; Fruscio R; Bellani G
Recenti Prog Med; 2017 Sep; 108(9):355-359. PubMed ID: 28901342
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Peer-review and editorial process of the Ethiopian Medical Journal: ten years assessment of the status of submitted manuscripts.
Enquselassie F
Ethiop Med J; 2013 Apr; 51(2):95-103. PubMed ID: 24079153
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Reviewing manuscripts for peer-review journals: a primer for novice and seasoned reviewers.
Lovejoy TI; Revenson TA; France CR
Ann Behav Med; 2011 Aug; 42(1):1-13. PubMed ID: 21505912
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Editorial peer reviewers' recommendations at a general medical journal: are they reliable and do editors care?
Kravitz RL; Franks P; Feldman MD; Gerrity M; Byrne C; Tierney WM
PLoS One; 2010 Apr; 5(4):e10072. PubMed ID: 20386704
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Getting published well requires fulfilling editors' and reviewers' needs and desires.
Schoenwolf GC
Dev Growth Differ; 2013 Dec; 55(9):735-43. PubMed ID: 24131034
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Journal editors' perspectives on the roles and tasks of peer reviewers in biomedical journals: a qualitative study.
Glonti K; Boutron I; Moher D; Hren D
BMJ Open; 2019 Nov; 9(11):e033421. PubMed ID: 31767597
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. [The different models of scientific journals].
Chippaux JP
Med Trop Sante Int; 2023 Dec; 3(4):. PubMed ID: 38390021
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Analysis of the Revision Process by American Journal of Roentgenology Reviewers and Section Editors: Metrics of Rejected Manuscripts and Their Final Disposition.
Cejas C
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2017 Jun; 208(6):1181-1184. PubMed ID: 28350482
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Variability of Reviewers' Comments in the Peer Review Process for Orthopaedic Research.
Iantorno SE; Andras LM; Skaggs DL
Spine Deform; 2016 Jul; 4(4):268-271. PubMed ID: 27927515
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Differences in review quality and recommendations for publication between peer reviewers suggested by authors or by editors.
Schroter S; Tite L; Hutchings A; Black N
JAMA; 2006 Jan; 295(3):314-7. PubMed ID: 16418467
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A Learned Society's Perspective on Publishing.
Suzuki K; Edelson A; Iversen LL; Hausmann L; Schulz JB; Turner AJ
J Neurochem; 2016 Oct; 139 Suppl 2():17-23. PubMed ID: 27534728
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [Improvement and decision-making process of an article].
Matías-Guiu J; García Ramos R
Neurologia; 2009; 24(6):353-8. PubMed ID: 19798600
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Editors' perspectives on the peer-review process in biomedical journals: protocol for a qualitative study.
Glonti K; Hren D
BMJ Open; 2018 Oct; 8(10):e020568. PubMed ID: 30341111
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The relationship between a reviewer's recommendation and editorial decision of manuscripts submitted for publication in obstetrics.
Vintzileos AM; Ananth CV; Odibo AO; Chauhan SP; Smulian JC; Oyelese Y
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2014 Dec; 211(6):703.e1-5. PubMed ID: 24983685
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Acceptance rates for manuscripts submitted to veterinary peer-reviewed journals in 2012.
Lamb CR; Adams CA
Equine Vet J; 2015 Nov; 47(6):736-40. PubMed ID: 25302854
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Editors' requests of peer reviewers: a study and a proposal.
Frank E
Prev Med; 1996; 25(2):102-4. PubMed ID: 8860274
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The role of the manuscript reviewer in the peer review process.
Polak JF
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1995 Sep; 165(3):685-8. PubMed ID: 7645496
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Efficacy of Double-Blind Peer Review in an Imaging Subspecialty Journal.
O'Connor EE; Cousar M; Lentini JA; Castillo M; Halm K; Zeffiro TA
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol; 2017 Feb; 38(2):230-235. PubMed ID: 27856433
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Reasons for Manuscript Rejection After Peer Review From the Journal Headache.
Hesterman CM; Szperka CL; Turner DP
Headache; 2018 Nov; 58(10):1511-1518. PubMed ID: 30011058
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The bane of publishing a research article in international journals by African researchers, the peer-review process and the contentious issue of predatory journals: a commentary.
Tarkang EE; Bain LE
Pan Afr Med J; 2019; 32():119. PubMed ID: 31223409
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
