BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

493 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28901655)

  • 1. Clinically insignificant prostate cancer suitable for active surveillance according to Prostate Cancer Research International: Active surveillance criteria: Utility of PI-RADS v2.
    Yim JH; Kim CK; Kim JH
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2018 Apr; 47(4):1072-1079. PubMed ID: 28901655
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [Preliminary applicability evaluation of Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System version 2 diagnostic score in 3.0T multi-parameters magnetic resonance imaging combined with prostate specific antigen density for prostate cancer].
    Zuo MZ; Zhao WL; Wei CG; Zhang CY; Wen R; Gu YF; Li MJ; Zhang YY; Wu JF; Li X; Shen JK
    Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2017 Dec; 97(47):3693-3698. PubMed ID: 29325321
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Prostate Cancer Differentiation and Aggressiveness: Assessment With a Radiomic-Based Model vs. PI-RADS v2.
    Chen T; Li M; Gu Y; Zhang Y; Yang S; Wei C; Wu J; Li X; Zhao W; Shen J
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2019 Mar; 49(3):875-884. PubMed ID: 30230108
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparison of PI-RADS 2, ADC histogram-derived parameters, and their combination for the diagnosis of peripheral zone prostate cancer.
    Lin WC; Westphalen AC; Silva GE; Chodraui Filho S; Reis RB; Muglia VF
    Abdom Radiol (NY); 2016 Nov; 41(11):2209-2217. PubMed ID: 27364781
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. PI-RADS v2 and ADC values: is there room for improvement?
    Jordan EJ; Fiske C; Zagoria R; Westphalen AC
    Abdom Radiol (NY); 2018 Nov; 43(11):3109-3116. PubMed ID: 29550953
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Differentiation of prostatitis and prostate cancer using the Prostate Imaging-Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS).
    Meier-Schroers M; Kukuk G; Wolter K; Decker G; Fischer S; Marx C; Traeber F; Sprinkart AM; Block W; Schild HH; Willinek W
    Eur J Radiol; 2016 Jul; 85(7):1304-11. PubMed ID: 27235878
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Evaluation of relationships between the final Gleason score, PI-RADS v2 score, ADC value, PSA level, and tumor diameter in patients that underwent radical prostatectomy due to prostate cancer.
    Gündoğdu E; Emekli E; Kebapçı M
    Radiol Med; 2020 Sep; 125(9):827-837. PubMed ID: 32266690
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Can Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System Version 2 reduce unnecessary prostate biopsies in men with PSA levels of 4-10 ng/ml?
    Xu N; Wu YP; Chen DN; Ke ZB; Cai H; Wei Y; Zheng QS; Huang JB; Li XD; Xue XY
    J Cancer Res Clin Oncol; 2018 May; 144(5):987-995. PubMed ID: 29504080
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. PI-RADS v2 and periprostatic fat measured on multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging can predict upgrading in radical prostatectomy pathology amongst patients with biopsy Gleason score 3 + 3 prostate cancer.
    Zhai L; Fan Y; Sun S; Wang H; Meng Y; Hu S; Wang X; Yu W; Jin J
    Scand J Urol; 2018; 52(5-6):333-339. PubMed ID: 30895901
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Intraductal carcinoma of the prostate (IDC-P) lowers apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values among intermediate risk prostate cancers.
    Currin S; Flood TA; Krishna S; Ansari A; McInnes MDF; Schieda N
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2019 Jul; 50(1):279-287. PubMed ID: 30585372
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Effect of observation size and apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) value in PI-RADS v2.1 assessment category 4 and 5 observations compared to adverse pathological outcomes.
    Abreu-Gomez J; Walker D; Alotaibi T; McInnes MDF; Flood TA; Schieda N
    Eur Radiol; 2020 Aug; 30(8):4251-4261. PubMed ID: 32211965
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. How Often is the Dynamic Contrast Enhanced Score Needed in PI-RADS Version 2?
    Roh AT; Fan RE; Sonn GA; Vasanawala SS; Ghanouni P; Loening AM
    Curr Probl Diagn Radiol; 2020; 49(3):173-176. PubMed ID: 31126664
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. How to make clinical decisions to avoid unnecessary prostate screening in biopsy-naïve men with PI-RADs v2 score ≤ 3?
    Zhang Y; Zeng N; Zhang F; Huang Y; Tian Y
    Int J Clin Oncol; 2020 Jan; 25(1):175-186. PubMed ID: 31473884
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Using the prostate imaging reporting and data system version 2 (PI-RIDS v2) to detect prostate cancer can prevent unnecessary biopsies and invasive treatment.
    Liu C; Liu SL; Wang ZX; Yu K; Feng CX; Ke Z; Wang L; Zeng XY
    Asian J Androl; 2018; 20(5):459-464. PubMed ID: 29667616
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Prospective PI-RADS v2.1 Atypical Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia Nodules With Marked Restricted Diffusion: Detection of Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer on Multiparametric MRI.
    Costa DN; Jia L; Subramanian N; Xi Y; Rofsky NM; Recchimuzzi DZ; de Leon AD; Arraj P; Pedrosa I
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2021 Aug; 217(2):395-403. PubMed ID: 32876473
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparison of PI-RADS v1 and v2 for multiparametric MRI detection of prostate cancer with whole-mount histological workup as reference standard.
    Schaudinn A; Gawlitza J; Mucha S; Linder N; Franz T; Horn LC; Kahn T; Busse H
    Eur J Radiol; 2019 Jul; 116():180-185. PubMed ID: 31153562
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Combination of prostate imaging reporting and data system (PI-RADS) score and prostate-specific antigen (PSA) density predicts biopsy outcome in prostate biopsy naïve patients.
    Washino S; Okochi T; Saito K; Konishi T; Hirai M; Kobayashi Y; Miyagawa T
    BJU Int; 2017 Feb; 119(2):225-233. PubMed ID: 26935594
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Evaluating the performance of PI-RADS v2 in the non-academic setting.
    Jordan EJ; Fiske C; Zagoria RJ; Westphalen AC
    Abdom Radiol (NY); 2017 Nov; 42(11):2725-2731. PubMed ID: 28451763
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparison of the Utility of PI-RADS 2.1, ADC Values, and Combined Use of Both, for the Diagnosis of Transition Zone Prostate Cancers.
    Liu X; Xiong Q; Zeng W; Yang R; Wen Y; Li X
    J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2024 Mar-Apr 01; 48(2):206-211. PubMed ID: 38149651
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Simplified Luminal Water Imaging for the Detection of Prostate Cancer From Multiecho T
    Devine W; Giganti F; Johnston EW; Sidhu HS; Panagiotaki E; Punwani S; Alexander DC; Atkinson D
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2019 Sep; 50(3):910-917. PubMed ID: 30566264
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 25.