These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

358 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28902236)

  • 1. Should my composite restorations last forever? Why are they failing?
    Demarco FF; Collares K; Correa MB; Cenci MS; Moraes RR; Opdam NJ
    Braz Oral Res; 2017 Aug; 31(suppl 1):e56. PubMed ID: 28902236
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Clinical longevity of extensive direct composite restorations in amalgam replacement: up to 3.5 years follow-up.
    Scholtanus JD; Ozcan M
    J Dent; 2014 Nov; 42(11):1404-10. PubMed ID: 24994619
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [Despite all--do we have an appropriate substitute for amalgam?].
    Levin L; Samorodnitzky-Naveh G; Coval M; Geiger SB
    Refuat Hapeh Vehashinayim (1993); 2008 Apr; 25(2):23-6, 73. PubMed ID: 18780542
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Are there universal restorative composites for anterior and posterior teeth?
    Baldissera RA; Corrêa MB; Schuch HS; Collares K; Nascimento GG; Jardim PS; Moraes RR; Opdam NJ; Demarco FF
    J Dent; 2013 Nov; 41(11):1027-35. PubMed ID: 24001506
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparison between published clinical success of direct resin composite restorations in vital posterior teeth in 1995-2005 and 2006-2016 periods.
    Alvanforoush N; Palamara J; Wong RH; Burrow MF
    Aust Dent J; 2017 Jun; 62(2):132-145. PubMed ID: 27861960
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Longevity of posterior composite restorations: not only a matter of materials.
    Demarco FF; Corrêa MB; Cenci MS; Moraes RR; Opdam NJ
    Dent Mater; 2012 Jan; 28(1):87-101. PubMed ID: 22192253
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Higher experience of caries and lower income trajectory influence the quality of restorations: A multilevel analysis in a birth cohort.
    Collares K; Opdam NJ; Peres KG; Peres MA; Horta BL; Demarco FF; Correa MB
    J Dent; 2018 Jan; 68():79-84. PubMed ID: 29169969
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A retrospective clinical study on longevity of posterior composite and amalgam restorations.
    Opdam NJ; Bronkhorst EM; Roeters JM; Loomans BA
    Dent Mater; 2007 Jan; 23(1):2-8. PubMed ID: 16417916
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A clinical evaluation of a giomer restorative system containing surface prereacted glass ionomer filler: results from a 13-year recall examination.
    Gordan VV; Blaser PK; Watson RE; Mjör IA; McEdward DL; Sensi LG; Riley JL
    J Am Dent Assoc; 2014 Oct; 145(10):1036-43. PubMed ID: 25270702
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Defective dental restorations: to repair or not to repair? Part 1: direct composite restorations.
    Blum IR; Jagger DC; Wilson NH
    Dent Update; 2011 Mar; 38(2):78-80, 82-4. PubMed ID: 21500616
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Longevity of composite restorations is definitely not only about materials.
    Demarco FF; Cenci MS; Montagner AF; de Lima VP; Correa MB; Moraes RR; Opdam NJM
    Dent Mater; 2023 Jan; 39(1):1-12. PubMed ID: 36494241
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A 15-year randomized controlled study of a reduced shrinkage stress resin composite.
    van Dijken JW; Lindberg A
    Dent Mater; 2015 Sep; 31(9):1150-8. PubMed ID: 26205382
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Longevity of posterior restorations in primary teeth: results from a paediatric dental clinic.
    Pinto Gdos S; Oliveira LJ; Romano AR; Schardosim LR; Bonow ML; Pacce M; Correa MB; Demarco FF; Torriani DD
    J Dent; 2014 Oct; 42(10):1248-54. PubMed ID: 25150105
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Do socioeconomic determinants affect the quality of posterior dental restorations? A multilevel approach.
    Correa MB; Peres MA; Peres KG; Horta BL; Barros AJ; Demarco FF
    J Dent; 2013 Nov; 41(11):960-7. PubMed ID: 23454330
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A randomized controlled 30 years follow up of three conventional resin composites in Class II restorations.
    Pallesen U; van Dijken JW
    Dent Mater; 2015 Oct; 31(10):1232-44. PubMed ID: 26321155
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Five-year clinical performance of posterior resin composite restorations placed by dental students.
    Opdam NJ; Loomans BA; Roeters FJ; Bronkhorst EM
    J Dent; 2004 Jul; 32(5):379-83. PubMed ID: 15193786
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Three-year clinical evaluation of a silorane composite resin.
    Walter R; Boushell LW; Heymann HO; Ritter AV; Sturdevant JR; Wilder AD; Chung Y; Swift EJ
    J Esthet Restor Dent; 2014; 26(3):179-90. PubMed ID: 24344912
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Clinical results and new developments of direct posterior restorations.
    Hickel R; Manhart J; García-Godoy F
    Am J Dent; 2000 Nov; 13(Spec No):41D-54D. PubMed ID: 11763918
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Nine-year evaluation of a polyacid-modified resin composite/resin composite open sandwich technique in Class II cavities.
    Lindberg A; van Dijken JW; Lindberg M
    J Dent; 2007 Feb; 35(2):124-9. PubMed ID: 16956709
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Fracture strength and fracture patterns of root filled teeth restored with direct resin restorations.
    Taha NA; Palamara JE; Messer HH
    J Dent; 2011 Aug; 39(8):527-35. PubMed ID: 21620926
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 18.