These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
2. A mixed-methods evaluation of continuous electronic fetal monitoring for an extended period. Crawford A; Anyadi P; Stephens L; Thomas SL; Reid H; Higgins LE; Warrander LK; Johnstone ED; Heazell AEP Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2018 Dec; 97(12):1515-1523. PubMed ID: 30132798 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. How does the use of continuous electronic fetal monitoring influence women's experiences of labour? A systematic integrative review of the literature from high income countries. Murray S; Fox DJ; Coddington RL; Scarf VL Women Birth; 2024 Jul; 37(4):101619. PubMed ID: 38754249 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Beyond the black stump: rapid reviews of health research issues affecting regional, rural and remote Australia. Osborne SR; Alston LV; Bolton KA; Whelan J; Reeve E; Wong Shee A; Browne J; Walker T; Versace VL; Allender S; Nichols M; Backholer K; Goodwin N; Lewis S; Dalton H; Prael G; Curtin M; Brooks R; Verdon S; Crockett J; Hodgins G; Walsh S; Lyle DM; Thompson SC; Browne LJ; Knight S; Pit SW; Jones M; Gillam MH; Leach MJ; Gonzalez-Chica DA; Muyambi K; Eshetie T; Tran K; May E; Lieschke G; Parker V; Smith A; Hayes C; Dunlop AJ; Rajappa H; White R; Oakley P; Holliday S Med J Aust; 2020 Dec; 213 Suppl 11():S3-S32.e1. PubMed ID: 33314144 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A systematic scoping review to identify the design and assess the performance of devices for antenatal continuous fetal monitoring. Tamber KK; Hayes DJL; Carey SJ; Wijekoon JHB; Heazell AEP PLoS One; 2020; 15(12):e0242983. PubMed ID: 33259507 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Continuous objective recording of fetal heart rate and fetal movements could reliably identify fetal compromise, which could reduce stillbirth rates by facilitating timely management. Brown R; Wijekoon JH; Fernando A; Johnstone ED; Heazell AE Med Hypotheses; 2014 Sep; 83(3):410-7. PubMed ID: 25109874 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Women's evaluations of their experience in a multicenter randomized controlled trial of intrapartum fetal pulse oximetry (The FOREMOST Trial). East CE; Chan FY; Brennecke SP; King JF; Colditz PB Birth; 2006 Jun; 33(2):101-9. PubMed ID: 16732774 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Australian women's experiences of wearing a non-invasive fetal electrocardiography (NIFECG) device during labour. Coddington R; Scarf V; Fox D Women Birth; 2023 Nov; 36(6):546-551. PubMed ID: 36925403 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Recommendations for intrapartum fetal monitoring are not followed in low-risk women: A study from two Norwegian birth units. Rosset IK; Lindahl K; Blix E; Kaasen A Sex Reprod Healthc; 2020 Dec; 26():100552. PubMed ID: 33038758 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Can promoting awareness of fetal movements and focusing interventions reduce fetal mortality? A stepped-wedge cluster randomised trial (AFFIRM). Heazell AEP; Weir CJ; Stock SJE; Calderwood CJ; Burley SC; Froen JF; Geary M; Hunter A; McAuliffe FM; Murdoch E; Rodriguez A; Ross-Davie M; Scott J; Whyte S; Norman JE BMJ Open; 2017 Aug; 7(8):e014813. PubMed ID: 28801392 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Interventions to enhance maternal awareness of decreased fetal movement: a systematic review. Winje BA; Wojcieszek AM; Gonzalez-Angulo LY; Teoh Z; Norman J; Frøen JF; Flenady V BJOG; 2016 May; 123(6):886-98. PubMed ID: 26629884 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Home-based telemonitoring versus hospital admission in high risk pregnancies: a qualitative study on women's experiences. van den Heuvel JFM; Teunis CJ; Franx A; Crombag NMTH; Bekker MN BMC Pregnancy Childbirth; 2020 Feb; 20(1):77. PubMed ID: 32019499 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Student and educator experiences of maternal-child simulation-based learning: a systematic review of qualitative evidence protocol. MacKinnon K; Marcellus L; Rivers J; Gordon C; Ryan M; Butcher D JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep; 2015 Jan; 13(1):14-26. PubMed ID: 26447004 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Women's experiences of two different self-assessment methods for monitoring fetal movements in full-term pregnancy--a crossover trial. Malm MC; Rådestad I; Rubertsson C; Hildingsson I; Lindgren H BMC Pregnancy Childbirth; 2014 Oct; 14():349. PubMed ID: 25288075 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Experiences and cessation needs of Indigenous women who smoke during pregnancy: a systematic review of qualitative evidence. Small S; Porr C; Swab M; Murray C JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep; 2018 Feb; 16(2):385-452. PubMed ID: 29419622 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Women's perceptions and experiences of severe maternal morbidity--a synthesis of qualitative studies using a meta-ethnographic approach. Furuta M; Sandall J; Bick D Midwifery; 2014 Feb; 30(2):158-69. PubMed ID: 24144992 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Women's experiences of outpatient induction of labour with remote continuous monitoring. O'Brien E; Rauf Z; Alfirevic Z; Lavender T Midwifery; 2013 Apr; 29(4):325-31. PubMed ID: 23159160 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Women's Experiences of Seeking and Receiving Psychological and Psychosocial Interventions for Postpartum Depression: A Systematic Review and Thematic Synthesis of the Qualitative Literature. Hadfield H; Wittkowski A J Midwifery Womens Health; 2017 Nov; 62(6):723-736. PubMed ID: 29210501 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Women's experience of menopause: a systematic review of qualitative evidence. Hoga L; Rodolpho J; Gonçalves B; Quirino B JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep; 2015 Sep; 13(8):250-337. PubMed ID: 26455946 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Intermittent versus continuous electronic monitoring in labour: a randomised study. Herbst A; Ingemarsson I Br J Obstet Gynaecol; 1994 Aug; 101(8):663-8. PubMed ID: 7947499 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]