BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

285 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28902575)

  • 1. Sample-Size Planning for More Accurate Statistical Power: A Method Adjusting Sample Effect Sizes for Publication Bias and Uncertainty.
    Anderson SF; Kelley K; Maxwell SE
    Psychol Sci; 2017 Nov; 28(11):1547-1562. PubMed ID: 28902575
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Planning sample sizes when effect sizes are uncertain: The power-calibrated effect size approach.
    McShane BB; Böckenholt U
    Psychol Methods; 2016 Mar; 21(1):47-60. PubMed ID: 26651984
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Using prior information to plan appropriately powered regression studies: A tutorial using BUCSS.
    Anderson SF
    Psychol Methods; 2021 Oct; 26(5):513-526. PubMed ID: 33119336
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Sample Size Planning for Detecting Mediation Effects: A Power Analysis Procedure Considering Uncertainty in Effect Size Estimates.
    Liu X; Wang L
    Multivariate Behav Res; 2019; 54(6):822-839. PubMed ID: 30983425
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The effect of publication bias on the Q test and assessment of heterogeneity.
    Augusteijn HEM; van Aert RCM; van Assen MALM
    Psychol Methods; 2019 Feb; 24(1):116-134. PubMed ID: 30489099
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Best (but oft forgotten) practices: sample size planning for powerful studies.
    Anderson SF
    Am J Clin Nutr; 2019 Aug; 110(2):280-295. PubMed ID: 31131390
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A Bayesian Power Analysis Procedure Considering Uncertainty in Effect Size Estimates from a Meta-analysis.
    Du H; Wang L
    Multivariate Behav Res; 2016; 51(5):589-605. PubMed ID: 27485763
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Adjusting for publication bias in the presence of heterogeneity.
    Terrin N; Schmid CH; Lau J; Olkin I
    Stat Med; 2003 Jul; 22(13):2113-26. PubMed ID: 12820277
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The relationship between statistical power and predictor distribution in multilevel logistic regression: a simulation-based approach.
    Olvera Astivia OL; Gadermann A; Guhn M
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2019 May; 19(1):97. PubMed ID: 31072299
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Addressing the "Replication Crisis": Using Original Studies to Design Replication Studies with Appropriate Statistical Power.
    Anderson SF; Maxwell SE
    Multivariate Behav Res; 2017; 52(3):305-324. PubMed ID: 28266872
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Sample size determination for a t test given a t value from a previous study: A FORTRAN 77 program.
    Gillett R
    Behav Res Methods Instrum Comput; 2001 Nov; 33(4):544-8. PubMed ID: 11816459
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Confidence interval for statistical power using a sample variance estimate.
    Liu X
    Nurse Res; 2013; 21(1):40-6. PubMed ID: 24004431
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A Practical ANOVA Approach for Uncertainty Analysis in Population-Based Disease Microsimulation Models.
    Sharif B; Wong H; Anis AH; Kopec JA
    Value Health; 2017 Apr; 20(4):710-717. PubMed ID: 28408016
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Some thoughts on sample size: a Bayesian-frequentist hybrid approach.
    Gordon Lan KK; Wittes JT
    Clin Trials; 2012 Oct; 9(5):561-9. PubMed ID: 22865839
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Sample size determination for a binary response in a superiority clinical trial using a hybrid classical and Bayesian procedure.
    Ciarleglio MM; Arendt CD
    Trials; 2017 Feb; 18(1):83. PubMed ID: 28231813
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [GRADE guidelines: 5. Rating the quality of evidence: publication bias].
    Nolting A; Perleth M; Langer G; Meerpohl JJ; Gartlehner G; Kaminski-Hartenthaler A; Schünemann HJ
    Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes; 2012; 106(9):670-6. PubMed ID: 23200211
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Publication bias, statistical power and reporting practices in the Journal of Sports Sciences: potential barriers to replicability.
    Mesquida C; Murphy J; Lakens D; Warne J
    J Sports Sci; 2023 Sep; 41(16):1507-1517. PubMed ID: 38018365
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Uncertainty limits the use of power analysis.
    Pek J; Pitt MA; Wegener DT
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2024 Apr; 153(4):1139-1151. PubMed ID: 38587935
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Statistical considerations for reporting and planning heart rate variability case-control studies.
    Quintana DS
    Psychophysiology; 2017 Mar; 54(3):344-349. PubMed ID: 27914167
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Sample size calculations for clinical studies allowing for uncertainty about the variance.
    Julious SA; Owen RJ
    Pharm Stat; 2006; 5(1):29-37. PubMed ID: 17080926
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 15.