These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
139 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28902802)
1. Audiological Outcomes and Map Characteristics in Children With Perimodiolar and Slim Straight Array Cochlear Implants in Opposite Ears. Park LR; Teagle HFB; Brown KD; Gagnon EB; Woodard JS; Buchman CA Otol Neurotol; 2017 Oct; 38(9):e320-e326. PubMed ID: 28902802 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Intraindividual comparison of psychophysical parameters between perimodiolar and lateral-type electrode arrays in patients with bilateral cochlear implants. Jeong J; Kim M; Heo JH; Bang MY; Bae MR; Kim J; Choi JY Otol Neurotol; 2015 Feb; 36(2):228-34. PubMed ID: 25473955 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Toward a method of achieving balanced stimulation of bilateral auditory nerves: Evidence from children receiving matched and unmatched bilateral cochlear implants simultaneously. Tsai P; Wisener N; Papsin BC; Cushing SL; Gordon KA Hear Res; 2022 Mar; 416():108445. PubMed ID: 35104716 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Modiolar coiling, electrical thresholds, and speech perception after cochlear implantation using the nucleus contour advance electrode with the advance off stylet technique. Huang TC; Reitzen SD; Marrinan MS; Waltzman SB; Roland JT Otol Neurotol; 2006 Feb; 27(2):159-66. PubMed ID: 16436984 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Cochlear implantation with the nucleus slim straight electrode in subjects with residual low-frequency hearing. Skarzynski H; Lorens A; Matusiak M; Porowski M; Skarzynski PH; James CJ Ear Hear; 2014; 35(2):e33-43. PubMed ID: 24556970 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Objective, audiological and quality of life measures with the CI532 slim modiolar electrode. Hey M; Wesarg T; Mewes A; Helbig S; Hornung J; Lenarz T; Briggs R; Marx M; Ramos A; Stöver T; Escudé B; James CJ; Aschendorff A Cochlear Implants Int; 2019 Mar; 20(2):80-90. PubMed ID: 30465637 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Degree of modiolar coiling, electrical thresholds, and speech perception after cochlear implantation. Marrinan MS; Roland JT; Reitzen SD; Waltzman SB; Cohen LT; Cohen NL Otol Neurotol; 2004 May; 25(3):290-4. PubMed ID: 15129107 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Evolution of cochlear implant arrays result in changes in behavioral and physiological responses in children. Gordin A; Papsin B; James A; Gordon K Otol Neurotol; 2009 Oct; 30(7):908-15. PubMed ID: 19730148 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Association Between Intracochlear Electrode Design and Electrically-Evoked Compound Action Potential Measures in Cochlear Implant Users. Kim JS; Hong SH; Moon IJ Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2024 Sep; 171(3):849-857. PubMed ID: 38774957 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Outcomes of cochlear implantation in adults with asymmetric hearing loss. Franko-Tobin E; Camilon PR; Camposeo E; Holcomb MA; Meyer TA Otol Neurotol; 2015 Mar; 36(3):409-15. PubMed ID: 25569365 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Evaluation of Outcome Variability Associated With Lateral Wall, Mid-scalar, and Perimodiolar Electrode Arrays When Controlling for Preoperative Patient Characteristics. Fabie JE; Keller RG; Hatch JL; Holcomb MA; Camposeo EL; Lambert PR; Meyer TA; McRackan TR Otol Neurotol; 2018 Oct; 39(9):1122-1128. PubMed ID: 30106854 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]