These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

116 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28903651)

  • 1. For the Sake of the Eternal Group: Perceiving the Group as Trans-Generational and Endurance of Ingroup Suffering.
    Kahn DT; Klar Y; Roccas S
    Pers Soc Psychol Bull; 2017 Feb; 43(2):272-283. PubMed ID: 28903651
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The other side of we: when outgroup members express common identity.
    Gómez A; Dovidio JF; Huici C; Gaertner SL; Cuadrado I
    Pers Soc Psychol Bull; 2008 Dec; 34(12):1613-26. PubMed ID: 18832337
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. On not airing our dirty laundry: Intergroup contexts suppress ingroup criticism among strongly identified group members.
    Packer DJ
    Br J Soc Psychol; 2014 Mar; 53(1):93-111. PubMed ID: 23145830
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Corralling the ingroup: deviant derogation and perception of group variability.
    Hutchison P; Abrams D; De Moura GR
    J Soc Psychol; 2013; 153(3):334-50. PubMed ID: 23724703
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Who Represents Our Group? The Effects of Prototype Content on Perceived Status Dispersion and Social Undermining.
    Kim HY; Wiesenfeld BM
    Pers Soc Psychol Bull; 2017 Jun; 43(6):814-827. PubMed ID: 28903666
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Newcomers to Social Categories: Longitudinal Predictors and Consequences of Ingroup Identification.
    van Veelen R; Eisenbeiss KK; Otten S
    Pers Soc Psychol Bull; 2016 Jun; 42(6):811-25. PubMed ID: 27460273
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Competitive victimhood as a response to accusations of ingroup harm doing.
    Sullivan D; Landau MJ; Branscombe NR; Rothschild ZK
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 2012 Apr; 102(4):778-95. PubMed ID: 22229457
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Exclusion as self-protection: the function of subtypes for ingroup members.
    Parks-Stamm EJ
    Pers Soc Psychol Bull; 2013 May; 39(5):651-62. PubMed ID: 23471318
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Responses to endorsement of commonality by ingroup and outgroup members: the roles of group representation and threat.
    Gómez Á; Dovidio JF; Gaertner SL; Fernández S; Vázquez A
    Pers Soc Psychol Bull; 2013 Apr; 39(4):419-31. PubMed ID: 23456560
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Implicit ingroup metafavoritism: subtle preference for ingroup members displaying ingroup bias.
    Castelli L; Tomelleri S; Zogmaister C
    Pers Soc Psychol Bull; 2008 Jun; 34(6):807-18. PubMed ID: 18359956
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Stepping into Perpetrators' Shoes: How Ingroup Transgressions and Victimization Shape Support for Retributive Justice through Perspective-Taking With Perpetrators.
    Li M; Leidner B; Fernandez-Campos S
    Pers Soc Psychol Bull; 2020 Mar; 46(3):424-438. PubMed ID: 31246157
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [When "self-effacement" disappears: narratives of personal and group successes depending on an in group relationship].
    Muramoto Y; Yamaguchi S
    Shinrigaku Kenkyu; 2003 Aug; 74(3):253-62. PubMed ID: 14584256
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Effects of mortality salience on evaluation of ingroup and outgroup sources: the impact of pro- versus counterattitudinal positions.
    See YH; Petty RE
    Pers Soc Psychol Bull; 2006 Mar; 32(3):405-16. PubMed ID: 16455866
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Extended contact effects: is exposure to positive outgroup exemplars sufficient or is interaction with ingroup members necessary?
    Cernat V
    J Soc Psychol; 2011; 151(6):737-53. PubMed ID: 22208111
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Perceiving intergroup conflict: from game models to mental templates.
    Halevy N; Sagiv L; Roccas S; Bornstein G
    Pers Soc Psychol Bull; 2006 Dec; 32(12):1674-89. PubMed ID: 17122179
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. When does activating diversity alleviate, when does it increase intergroup bias? An ingroup projection perspective.
    Steffens MC; Reese G; Ehrke F; Jonas KJ
    PLoS One; 2017; 12(6):e0178738. PubMed ID: 28582443
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Evaluations of and reasoning about normative and deviant ingroup and outgroup members: development of the black sheep effect.
    Abrams D; Palmer SB; Rutland A; Cameron L; Van de Vyver J
    Dev Psychol; 2014 Jan; 50(1):258-70. PubMed ID: 23544855
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Overcoming the barrier of narrative adherence in conflicts through awareness of the psychological bias of naïve realism.
    Nasie M; Bar-Tal D; Pliskin R; Nahhas E; Halperin E
    Pers Soc Psychol Bull; 2014 Nov; 40(11):1543-56. PubMed ID: 25246039
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Perceiving your group's future to be in jeopardy: extinction threat induces collective angst and the desire to strengthen the ingroup.
    Wohl MJ; Branscombe NR; Reysen S
    Pers Soc Psychol Bull; 2010 Jul; 36(7):898-910. PubMed ID: 20519571
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Core disgust is attenuated by ingroup relations.
    Reicher SD; Templeton A; Neville F; Ferrari L; Drury J
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2016 Mar; 113(10):2631-5. PubMed ID: 26903640
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.