These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
185 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28903703)
1. Motivated Use of Numerical Anchors for Judgments Relevant to the Self. Joel S; Spielmann SS; MacDonald G Pers Soc Psychol Bull; 2017 Jul; 43(7):972-985. PubMed ID: 28903703 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The effect of accuracy motivation on anchoring and adjustment: do people adjust from provided anchors? Simmons JP; LeBoeuf RA; Nelson LD J Pers Soc Psychol; 2010 Dec; 99(6):917-32. PubMed ID: 21114351 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Not all Anchors Weigh Equally. Greenstein M; Velazquez A Exp Psychol; 2017 Nov; 64(6):398-405. PubMed ID: 29268677 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Taking chances in the face of threat: romantic risk regulation and approach motivation. Cavallo JV; Fitzsimons GM; Holmes JG Pers Soc Psychol Bull; 2009 Jun; 35(6):737-51. PubMed ID: 19307432 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Social acceptance of comparative optimism and realism. Milhabet I; Verlhiac JF Psychol Rep; 2011 Oct; 109(2):393-410. PubMed ID: 22238848 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The Interval Anchoring Effect. Liu M; Zeng J; Gao Z Exp Psychol; 2021 Nov; 68(6):295-304. PubMed ID: 35258361 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Open to offers, but resisting requests: How the framing of anchors affects motivation and negotiated outcomes. Majer JM; Trötschel R; Galinsky AD; Loschelder DD J Pers Soc Psychol; 2020 Sep; 119(3):582-599. PubMed ID: 31556681 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Biases in social comparative judgments: the role of nonmotivated factors in above-average and comparative-optimism effects. Chambers JR; Windschitl PD Psychol Bull; 2004 Sep; 130(5):813-38. PubMed ID: 15367082 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A pessimistic view of optimistic belief updating. Shah P; Harris AJ; Bird G; Catmur C; Hahn U Cogn Psychol; 2016 Nov; 90():71-127. PubMed ID: 27542765 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The influence of irrelevant anchors on the judgments and choices of doctors and patients. Brewer NT; Chapman GB; Schwartz JA; Bergus GR Med Decis Making; 2007; 27(2):203-11. PubMed ID: 17409369 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Biased perception of distributions: Anchoring, interpolation and smoothing as potential causes. Deutsch R; Ebert J; Barth M; Roth J Cognition; 2023 Aug; 237():105448. PubMed ID: 37229925 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Are people excessive or judicious in their egocentrism? A modeling approach to understanding bias and accuracy in people's optimism. Windschitl PD; Rose JP; Stalkfleet MT; Smith AR J Pers Soc Psychol; 2008 Aug; 95(2):253-73. PubMed ID: 18665701 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Age similarities in the anchoring effect in emotion intensity judgment. Jin M; Peng H; Wang D BMC Psychol; 2023 May; 11(1):158. PubMed ID: 37189205 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparative Pessimism or Optimism: Depressed Mood, Risk-Taking, Social Utility and Desirability. Milhabet I; Le Barbenchon E; Cambon L; Molina G Span J Psychol; 2015 Mar; 18():E10. PubMed ID: 26055185 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Anchors as Semantic Primes in Value Construction: An EEG Study of the Anchoring Effect. Ma Q; Li D; Shen Q; Qiu W PLoS One; 2015; 10(10):e0139954. PubMed ID: 26439926 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]