164 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28904771)
1. Sorting things out: Assessing effects of unequal specimen biomass on DNA metabarcoding.
Elbrecht V; Peinert B; Leese F
Ecol Evol; 2017 Sep; 7(17):6918-6926. PubMed ID: 28904771
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Pooling size sorted Malaise trap fractions to maximize taxon recovery with metabarcoding.
Elbrecht V; Bourlat SJ; Hörren T; Lindner A; Mordente A; Noll NW; Schäffler L; Sorg M; Zizka VMA
PeerJ; 2021; 9():e12177. PubMed ID: 34707928
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Can DNA-Based Ecosystem Assessments Quantify Species Abundance? Testing Primer Bias and Biomass--Sequence Relationships with an Innovative Metabarcoding Protocol.
Elbrecht V; Leese F
PLoS One; 2015; 10(7):e0130324. PubMed ID: 26154168
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Estimating intraspecific genetic diversity from community DNA metabarcoding data.
Elbrecht V; Vamos EE; Steinke D; Leese F
PeerJ; 2018; 6():e4644. PubMed ID: 29666773
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Modelling technical and biological biases in macroinvertebrate community assessment from bulk preservative using multiple metabarcoding markers.
Martins FMS; Porto M; Feio MJ; Egeter B; Bonin A; Serra SRQ; Taberlet P; Beja P
Mol Ecol; 2021 Jul; 30(13):3221-3238. PubMed ID: 32860303
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Testing the potential of a ribosomal 16S marker for DNA metabarcoding of insects.
Elbrecht V; Taberlet P; Dejean T; Valentini A; Usseglio-Polatera P; Beisel JN; Coissac E; Boyer F; Leese F
PeerJ; 2016; 4():e1966. PubMed ID: 27114891
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Targeted gene enrichment and high-throughput sequencing for environmental biomonitoring: a case study using freshwater macroinvertebrates.
Dowle EJ; Pochon X; C Banks J; Shearer K; Wood SA
Mol Ecol Resour; 2016 Sep; 16(5):1240-54. PubMed ID: 26583904
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Performance of amplicon and shotgun sequencing for accurate biomass estimation in invertebrate community samples.
Bista I; Carvalho GR; Tang M; Walsh K; Zhou X; Hajibabaei M; Shokralla S; Seymour M; Bradley D; Liu S; Christmas M; Creer S
Mol Ecol Resour; 2018 Apr; ():. PubMed ID: 29667329
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparison of environmental DNA and bulk-sample metabarcoding using highly degenerate cytochrome c oxidase I primers.
Macher JN; Vivancos A; Piggott JJ; Centeno FC; Matthaei CD; Leese F
Mol Ecol Resour; 2018 Nov; 18(6):1456-1468. PubMed ID: 30129704
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. DNA metabarcoding from sample fixative as a quick and voucher-preserving biodiversity assessment method
Zizka VMA; Leese F; Peinert B; Geiger MF
Genome; 2019 Mar; 62(3):122-136. PubMed ID: 30457888
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A broadly applicable COI primer pair and an efficient single-tube amplicon library preparation protocol for metabarcoding.
Rennstam Rubbmark O; Sint D; Horngacher N; Traugott M
Ecol Evol; 2018 Dec; 8(24):12335-12350. PubMed ID: 30619549
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. DNA metabarcoding quantifies the relative biomass of arthropod taxa in songbird diets: Validation with camera-recorded diets.
Verkuil YI; Nicolaus M; Ubels R; Dietz MW; Samplonius JM; Galema A; Kiekebos K; de Knijff P; Both C
Ecol Evol; 2022 May; 12(5):e8881. PubMed ID: 35571761
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Morphological vs. DNA metabarcoding approaches for the evaluation of stream ecological status with benthic invertebrates: Testing different combinations of markers and strategies of data filtering.
Meyer A; Boyer F; Valentini A; Bonin A; Ficetola GF; Beisel JN; Bouquerel J; Wagner P; Gaboriaud C; Leese F; Dejean T; Taberlet P; Usseglio-Polatera P
Mol Ecol; 2021 Jul; 30(13):3203-3220. PubMed ID: 33150613
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparative study of traditional and DNA-based methods for environmental impact assessment: A case study of marine aggregate extraction in the North Sea.
den Bulcke Laure V; Annelies B; Hans H; Sara M; Stephie S; Willem W; Jan W; Kris H; Sofie D
Sci Total Environ; 2024 Jun; ():174106. PubMed ID: 38908576
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Toward accurate species-level metabarcoding of arthropod communities from the tropical forest canopy.
Creedy TJ; Ng WS; Vogler AP
Ecol Evol; 2019 Mar; 9(6):3105-3116. PubMed ID: 30962884
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Increased performance of DNA metabarcoding of macroinvertebrates by taxonomic sorting.
Beentjes KK; Speksnijder AGCL; Schilthuizen M; Hoogeveen M; Pastoor R; van der Hoorn BB
PLoS One; 2019; 14(12):e0226527. PubMed ID: 31841568
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Have the cake and eat it: Optimizing nondestructive DNA metabarcoding of macroinvertebrate samples for freshwater biomonitoring.
Martins FMS; Galhardo M; Filipe AF; Teixeira A; Pinheiro P; Paupério J; Alves PC; Beja P
Mol Ecol Resour; 2019 Jul; 19(4):863-876. PubMed ID: 30901128
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Sorting specimen-rich invertebrate samples with cost-effective NGS barcodes: Validating a reverse workflow for specimen processing.
Wang WY; Srivathsan A; Foo M; Yamane SK; Meier R
Mol Ecol Resour; 2018 May; 18(3):490-501. PubMed ID: 29314756
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. DNA metabarcoding of insects and allies: an evaluation of primers and pipelines.
Brandon-Mong GJ; Gan HM; Sing KW; Lee PS; Lim PE; Wilson JJ
Bull Entomol Res; 2015 Dec; 105(6):717-27. PubMed ID: 26344799
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Environmental metabarcodes for insects: in silico PCR reveals potential for taxonomic bias.
Clarke LJ; Soubrier J; Weyrich LS; Cooper A
Mol Ecol Resour; 2014 Nov; 14(6):1160-70. PubMed ID: 24751203
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
