These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

119 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28905665)

  • 1. Does the DEKA Arm substitute for or supplement conventional prostheses.
    Resnik L; Acluche F; Lieberman Klinger S; Borgia M
    Prosthet Orthot Int; 2018 Oct; 42(5):534-543. PubMed ID: 28905665
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Do users want to receive a DEKA Arm and why? Overall findings from the Veterans Affairs Study to optimize the DEKA Arm.
    Resnik L; Latlief G; Klinger SL; Sasson N; Walters LS
    Prosthet Orthot Int; 2014 Dec; 38(6):456-66. PubMed ID: 24286806
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Movement quality of conventional prostheses and the DEKA Arm during everyday tasks.
    Cowley J; Resnik L; Wilken J; Smurr Walters L; Gates D
    Prosthet Orthot Int; 2017 Feb; 41(1):33-40. PubMed ID: 26932980
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Perceptions of satisfaction, usability and desirability of the DEKA Arm before and after a trial of home use.
    Resnik LJ; Borgia ML; Acluche F
    PLoS One; 2017; 12(6):e0178640. PubMed ID: 28575025
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Use of the DEKA Arm for amputees with brachial plexus injury: A case series.
    Resnik L; Fantini C; Latlief G; Phillips S; Sasson N; Sepulveda E
    PLoS One; 2017; 12(6):e0178642. PubMed ID: 28628623
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. How do the outcomes of the DEKA Arm compare to conventional prostheses?
    Resnik LJ; Borgia ML; Acluche F; Cancio JM; Latlief G; Sasson N
    PLoS One; 2018; 13(1):e0191326. PubMed ID: 29342217
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Attrition and retention in upper limb prosthetics research: experience of the VA home study of the DEKA arm.
    Resnik L; Klinger S
    Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol; 2017 Nov; 12(8):816-821. PubMed ID: 28098513
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Feminine identity and functional benefits are key factors in women's decision making about upper limb prostheses: a case series.
    Resnik L; Klinger S; Gill A; Ekerholm Biester S
    Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol; 2019 Feb; 14(2):194-208. PubMed ID: 29741966
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Self-reported and performance-based outcomes using DEKA Arm.
    Resnik L; Borgia M; Latlief G; Sasson N; Smurr-Walters L
    J Rehabil Res Dev; 2014; 51(3):351-62. PubMed ID: 25019659
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The DEKA hand: A multifunction prosthetic terminal device-patterns of grip usage at home.
    Resnik L; Acluche F; Borgia M
    Prosthet Orthot Int; 2018 Aug; 42(4):446-454. PubMed ID: 28914583
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Predictors of retention and attrition in a study of an advanced upper limb prosthesis: implications for adoption of the DEKA Arm.
    Resnik L; Cancio J; Klinger S; Latlief G; Sasson N; Smurr-Walters L
    Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol; 2018 Feb; 13(2):206-210. PubMed ID: 28375687
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. EMG pattern recognition compared to foot control of the DEKA Arm.
    Resnik LJ; Acluche F; Borgia M; Cancio J; Latlief G; Phillips S; Sasson N
    PLoS One; 2018; 13(10):e0204854. PubMed ID: 30335781
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Function, quality of life, and community integration of DEKA Arm users after discharge from prosthetic training: Impact of home use experience.
    Resnik L; Acluche F; Borgia M; Cancio J; Latlief G; Sasson N
    Prosthet Orthot Int; 2018 Dec; 42(6):571-582. PubMed ID: 29779455
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Appropriateness of advanced upper limb prosthesis prescription for a patient with cognitive impairment: a case report.
    Barredo J; Acluche F; Disla R; Fantini C; Fishelis L; Sasson N; Resnik L
    Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol; 2017 Aug; 12(6):647-656. PubMed ID: 27434169
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. User experience of controlling the DEKA Arm with EMG pattern recognition.
    Resnik LJ; Acluche F; Lieberman Klinger S
    PLoS One; 2018; 13(9):e0203987. PubMed ID: 30240420
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Controlling a multi-degree of freedom upper limb prosthesis using foot controls: user experience.
    Resnik L; Klinger SL; Etter K; Fantini C
    Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol; 2014 Jul; 9(4):318-29. PubMed ID: 23902465
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Reliability, Validity, and Responsiveness of the QuickDASH in Patients With Upper Limb Amputation.
    Resnik L; Borgia M
    Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 2015 Sep; 96(9):1676-83. PubMed ID: 25912667
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Cognitive predictors of skilled performance with an advanced upper limb multifunction prosthesis: a preliminary analysis.
    Hancock L; Correia S; Ahern D; Barredo J; Resnik L
    Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol; 2017 Jul; 12(5):504-511. PubMed ID: 27049235
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The DEKA Arm: its features, functionality, and evolution during the Veterans Affairs Study to optimize the DEKA Arm.
    Resnik L; Klinger SL; Etter K
    Prosthet Orthot Int; 2014 Dec; 38(6):492-504. PubMed ID: 24150930
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. User and clinician perspectives on DEKA arm: results of VA study to optimize DEKA arm.
    Resnik L; Klinger SL; Etter K
    J Rehabil Res Dev; 2014; 51(1):27-38. PubMed ID: 24805891
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.