These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

382 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28906241)

  • 1. Tracking of Noise Tolerance to Measure Hearing Aid Benefit.
    Kuk F; Seper E; Lau CC; Korhonen P
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2017 Sep; 28(8):698-707. PubMed ID: 28906241
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Tracking of Noise Tolerance to Predict Hearing Aid Satisfaction in Loud Noisy Environments.
    Seper E; Kuk F; Korhonen P; Slugocki C
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2019 Apr; 30(4):302-314. PubMed ID: 30461409
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Speech intelligibility benefits of hearing AIDS at various input levels.
    Kuk F; Lau CC; Korhonen P; Crose B
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2015 Mar; 26(3):275-88. PubMed ID: 25751695
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Sentence recognition in noise and perceived benefit of noise reduction on the receiver and transmitter sides of a BICROS hearing aid.
    Oeding K; Valente M
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2013; 24(10):980-91. PubMed ID: 24384083
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Effects of Directional Microphone and Noise Reduction on Subcortical and Cortical Auditory-Evoked Potentials in Older Listeners With Hearing Loss.
    Slugocki C; Kuk F; Korhonen P
    Ear Hear; 2020; 41(5):1282-1293. PubMed ID: 32058351
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Evaluation of a BICROS System with a Directional Microphone in the Receiver and Transmitter.
    Valente M; Oeding K
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2015; 26(10):856-71. PubMed ID: 26554490
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The effect of hearing aid technologies on listening in an automobile.
    Wu YH; Stangl E; Bentler RA; Stanziola RW
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2013 Jun; 24(6):474-85. PubMed ID: 23886425
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Personal amplification for school-age children with auditory processing disorders.
    Kuk F; Jackson A; Keenan D; Lau CC
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2008 Jun; 19(6):465-80. PubMed ID: 19253780
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Effects of coordinated compression and pinna compensation features on horizontal localization performance in hearing aid users.
    Korhonen P; Lau C; Kuk F; Keenan D; Schumacher J
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2015 Jan; 26(1):80-92. PubMed ID: 25597463
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Efficacy of a reverse cardioid directional microphone.
    Kuk F; Keenan D
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2012 Jan; 23(1):64-73. PubMed ID: 22284842
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Full time directional versus user selectable microphone modes in hearing aids.
    Ricketts T; Henry P; Gnewikow D
    Ear Hear; 2003 Oct; 24(5):424-39. PubMed ID: 14534412
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Factors influencing individual variation in perceptual directional microphone benefit.
    Keidser G; Dillon H; Convery E; Mejia J
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2013; 24(10):955-68. PubMed ID: 24384081
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Left Lateralization of the Cortical Auditory-Evoked Potential Reflects Aided Processing and Speech-in-Noise Performance of Older Listeners With a Hearing Loss.
    Slugocki C; Kuk F; Korhonen P
    Ear Hear; 2023 Mar-Apr 01; 44(2):399-410. PubMed ID: 36331191
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Measuring the effect of adaptive directionality and split processing on noise acceptance at multiple input levels.
    Kuk F; Slugocki C; Davis-Ruperto N; Korhonen P
    Int J Audiol; 2023 Jan; 62(1):21-29. PubMed ID: 35015970
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Speech recognition in noise using bilateral open-fit hearing aids: the limited benefit of directional microphones and noise reduction.
    Magnusson L; Claesson A; Persson M; Tengstrand T
    Int J Audiol; 2013 Jan; 52(1):29-36. PubMed ID: 22928919
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Speech recognition performance of patients with sensorineural hearing loss under unaided and aided conditions using linear and compression hearing AIDS.
    Shanks JE; Wilson RH; Larson V; Williams D
    Ear Hear; 2002 Aug; 23(4):280-90. PubMed ID: 12195170
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Noise reduction results of an adaptive filtering technique for dual-microphone behind-the-ear hearing aids.
    Maj JB; Wouters J; Moonen M
    Ear Hear; 2004 Jun; 25(3):215-29. PubMed ID: 15179113
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Impact of visual cues on directional benefit and preference: Part I--laboratory tests.
    Wu YH; Bentler RA
    Ear Hear; 2010 Feb; 31(1):22-34. PubMed ID: 19864954
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The effectiveness of the directional microphone in the Oticon Medical Ponto Pro in participants with unilateral sensorineural hearing loss.
    Oeding K; Valente M
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2013 Sep; 24(8):701-13. PubMed ID: 24131606
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Evaluation of a pinna compensation algorithm for sound localization and speech perception in noise.
    Kuk F; Korhonen P; Lau C; Keenan D; Norgaard M
    Am J Audiol; 2013 Jun; 22(1):84-93. PubMed ID: 23275583
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 20.