373 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28906383)
21. Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion for Isthmic Spondylolisthesis: In Situ Versus Reduction.
Fan G; Gu G; Zhu Y; Guan X; Hu A; Wu X; Zhang H; He S
World Neurosurg; 2016 Jun; 90():580-587.e1. PubMed ID: 26915276
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. A systematic review of anterior lumbar interbody fusion (ALIF) versus posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF), transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF), posterolateral lumbar fusion (PLF).
Rathbone J; Rackham M; Nielsen D; Lee SM; Hing W; Riar S; Scott-Young M
Eur Spine J; 2023 Jun; 32(6):1911-1926. PubMed ID: 37071155
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Revisions for screw malposition and clinical outcomes after robot-guided lumbar fusion for spondylolisthesis.
Schröder ML; Staartjes VE
Neurosurg Focus; 2017 May; 42(5):E12. PubMed ID: 28463610
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. [Comparative study on effectiveness of modified-transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion and posterior lumbar interbody fusion surgery in treatment of mild to moderate lumbar spondylolisthesis in middle-aged and elderly patients].
Yang Z; Liu B; Lan H; Ye H; Chen J; Xia H; Zhang Y; Han F
Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2020 May; 34(5):550-556. PubMed ID: 32410419
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Perioperative outcomes and adverse events of minimally invasive versus open posterior lumbar fusion: meta-analysis and systematic review.
Goldstein CL; Macwan K; Sundararajan K; Rampersaud YR
J Neurosurg Spine; 2016 Mar; 24(3):416-27. PubMed ID: 26565767
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Clinical and radiographic outcomes of bilateral decompression via a unilateral approach with transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis with stenosis.
Cheng X; Zhang K; Sun X; Zhao C; Li H; Ni B; Zhao J
Spine J; 2017 Aug; 17(8):1127-1133. PubMed ID: 28416439
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Comparison of Minimally Invasive Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion, Minimally Invasive Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion, and Open Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion in the Treatment of Single-Level Spondylolisthesis of L4-L5.
Jang HD; Lee JC; Seo JH; Roh YH; Choi SW; Shin BJ
World Neurosurg; 2022 Feb; 158():e10-e18. PubMed ID: 34637941
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. [Effects of robot-assisted minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion and traditional open surgery in the treatment of lumbar spondylolisthesis].
Cui GY; Tian W; He D; Xing YG; Liu B; Yuan Q; Wang YQ; Sun YQ
Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2017 Jul; 55(7):543-548. PubMed ID: 28655085
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
29. Patient-reported and radiographic outcomes of minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for degenerative spondylolisthesis with or without reduction: A comparative study.
Fan G; Zhang H; Guan X; Gu G; Wu X; Hu A; Gu X; He S
J Clin Neurosci; 2016 Nov; 33():111-118. PubMed ID: 27443498
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Comparison of Minimally Invasive Transforaminal and Anterolateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion for Treatment of Low-grade Lumbar Spondylolisthesis.
Zhu L; Wang P; Zhang L; Feng X; Zhang W
Clin Spine Surg; 2022 Mar; 35(2):E285-E291. PubMed ID: 34654771
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Minimally Invasive Versus Traditional Open Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion for the Treatment of Single-Level Spondylolisthesis Grades 1 and 2: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Qin R; Liu B; Zhou P; Yao Y; Hao J; Yang K; Xu TL; Zhang F; Chen X
World Neurosurg; 2019 Feb; 122():180-189. PubMed ID: 30414524
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Intraoperative reduction does not result in better outcomes in low-grade lumbar spondylolisthesis with neurogenic symptoms after minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion-a 5-year follow-up study.
Tay KS; Bassi A; Yeo W; Yue WM
Spine J; 2016 Feb; 16(2):182-90. PubMed ID: 26515392
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) versus posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF) in lumbar spondylolisthesis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
de Kunder SL; van Kuijk SMJ; Rijkers K; Caelers IJMH; van Hemert WLW; de Bie RA; van Santbrink H
Spine J; 2017 Nov; 17(11):1712-1721. PubMed ID: 28647584
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Minimally Invasive Lumbar Decompression Versus Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion for Treatment of Low-Grade Lumbar Degenerative Spondylolisthesis.
Bovonratwet P; Samuel AM; Mok JK; Vaishnav AS; Morse KW; Song J; Steinhaus ME; Jordan YJ; Gang CH; Qureshi SA
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2022 Nov; 47(21):1505-1514. PubMed ID: 35867599
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Complete anatomic reduction and monosegmental fusion for lumbar spondylolisthesis of Grade II and higher: use of the minimally invasive "rocking" technique.
Rajakumar DV; Hari A; Krishna M; Sharma A; Reddy M
Neurosurg Focus; 2017 Aug; 43(2):E12. PubMed ID: 28760034
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Full-Endoscopic Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion Via an Interlaminar Approach Versus Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion: A Preliminary Retrospective Study.
Li Y; Dai Y; Wang B; Li L; Li P; Xu J; Jiang B; Lü G
World Neurosurg; 2020 Dec; 144():e475-e482. PubMed ID: 32891847
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. A perioperative cost analysis comparing single-level minimally invasive and open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion.
Singh K; Nandyala SV; Marquez-Lara A; Fineberg SJ; Oglesby M; Pelton MA; Andersson GB; Isayeva D; Jegier BJ; Phillips FM
Spine J; 2014 Aug; 14(8):1694-701. PubMed ID: 24252237
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Minimally invasive versus open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for degenerative spondylolisthesis: comparative effectiveness and cost-utility analysis.
Parker SL; Mendenhall SK; Shau DN; Zuckerman SL; Godil SS; Cheng JS; McGirt MJ
World Neurosurg; 2014; 82(1-2):230-8. PubMed ID: 23321379
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Endoscopic transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion without general anesthesia: operative and clinical outcomes in 100 consecutive patients with a minimum 1-year follow-up.
Kolcun JPG; Brusko GD; Basil GW; Epstein R; Wang MY
Neurosurg Focus; 2019 Apr; 46(4):E14. PubMed ID: 30933915
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Long-term durability of minimal invasive posterior transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: a clinical and radiographic follow-up.
Rouben D; Casnellie M; Ferguson M
J Spinal Disord Tech; 2011 Jul; 24(5):288-96. PubMed ID: 20975594
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
