BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

284 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28906425)

  • 1. Impact of Changeover to Newer Endoscopic Systems on Quality and Efficiency of Screening and Surveillance Colonoscopy: Equipment or Endoscopist.
    Singh M; Sacatos M; Laine L
    J Clin Gastroenterol; 2018; 52(10):891-895. PubMed ID: 28906425
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Factors Associated with Surveillance Adenoma and Sessile Serrated Polyp Detection Rates.
    Maratt JK; Dickens J; Schoenfeld PS; Elta GH; Jackson K; Rizk D; Erickson C; Menees SB
    Dig Dis Sci; 2017 Dec; 62(12):3579-3585. PubMed ID: 29043592
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Relationship between the endoscopic withdrawal time and adenoma/polyp detection rate in individual colonic segments: a KASID multicenter study.
    Jung Y; Joo YE; Kim HG; Jeon SR; Cha JM; Yang HJ; Kim JW; Lee J; Kim KO; Song HK; Hwangbo Y; Shin JE
    Gastrointest Endosc; 2019 Mar; 89(3):523-530. PubMed ID: 30267654
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Latest Generation High-Definition Colonoscopy Increases Adenoma Detection Rate by Trainee Endoscopists.
    Lee JY; Koh M; Lee JH
    Dig Dis Sci; 2021 Aug; 66(8):2756-2762. PubMed ID: 32808142
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Polyp Detection Rate Correlates Strongly with Adenoma Detection Rate in Trainee Endoscopists.
    Ng S; Sreenivasan AK; Pecoriello J; Liang PS
    Dig Dis Sci; 2020 Aug; 65(8):2229-2233. PubMed ID: 31927766
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Screening Colonoscopy Withdrawal Time Threshold for Adequate Proximal Serrated Polyp Detection Rate.
    Patel VD; Thompson WK; Lapin BR; Goldstein JL; Yen EF
    Dig Dis Sci; 2018 Nov; 63(11):3084-3090. PubMed ID: 29974376
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The 'ins and outs' of colonoscopy at Wits Donald Gordon Medical Centre, South Africa: A practice audit of the outpatient endoscopy unit.
    Bouter C; Barrow P; Bizos D; Bobat B; Devar J; Harran N; Joseph C; Mahomed A; Oettle J; Ramos J; Seabi M; Kgabage G; Gaylard P; Surridge D; Etheredge H; Fabian J; Lutrin D; Karlsson K
    S Afr Med J; 2020 Nov; 110(12):1186-1190. PubMed ID: 33403963
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Detection rates of premalignant polyps during screening colonoscopy: time to revise quality standards?
    Ross WA; Thirumurthi S; Lynch PM; Rashid A; Pande M; Shafi MA; Lee JH; Raju GS
    Gastrointest Endosc; 2015 Mar; 81(3):567-74. PubMed ID: 25583558
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Providing data for serrated polyp detection rate benchmarks: an analysis of the New Hampshire Colonoscopy Registry.
    Anderson JC; Butterly LF; Weiss JE; Robinson CM
    Gastrointest Endosc; 2017 Jun; 85(6):1188-1194. PubMed ID: 28153571
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Cimetropium bromide does not improve polyp and adenoma detection during colonoscope withdrawal: A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study.
    Jung P; Park SB; Kim HW; Kang DH; W Choi C; Kim SJ; Nam HS; Ryu DG; Hong JB; Kim DJ
    Medicine (Baltimore); 2018 Jun; 97(25):e11253. PubMed ID: 29924056
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Difference in Physician- and Patient-Dependent Factors Contributing to Adenoma Detection Rate and Serrated Polyp Detection Rate.
    Cavicchi M; Tharsis G; Burtin P; Cattan P; Venezia F; Tordjman G; Gillet A; Samama J; Nahon-Uzan K; Karsenti D
    Dig Dis Sci; 2019 Dec; 64(12):3579-3588. PubMed ID: 31471862
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Data quality and colonoscopy performance indicators in the prevalent round of a FIT-based colorectal cancer screening program.
    Lund M; Erichsen R; Valori R; Møller Jensen T; Helle Njor S; Laurberg S; Andersen B;
    Scand J Gastroenterol; 2019 Apr; 54(4):471-477. PubMed ID: 30978128
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Polyp Sizing Poster Improves Polyp Measurement but not Adenoma Detection Rates by Endoscopists in a Large Community Practice.
    Shaukat A; Shamsi N; Menk J; Church TR; Rank J; Colton JB
    Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2019 Sep; 17(10):2034-2041. PubMed ID: 30312788
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Experience of the endoscopist increases detection rates of smaller size and higher histological grade polyps.
    Solís-Muñoz P; Solís-Herruzo JA; Rodríguez-Muñoz S
    J Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2014 Jun; 29(6):1237-41. PubMed ID: 24955453
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Full-spectrum (FUSE) versus standard forward-viewing colonoscopy in an organised colorectal cancer screening programme.
    Hassan C; Senore C; Radaelli F; De Pretis G; Sassatelli R; Arrigoni A; Manes G; Amato A; Anderloni A; Armelao F; Mondardini A; Spada C; Omazzi B; Cavina M; Miori G; Campanale C; Sereni G; Segnan N; Repici A
    Gut; 2017 Nov; 66(11):1949-1955. PubMed ID: 27507903
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Nonneoplastic polypectomy during screening colonoscopy: the impact on polyp detection rate, adenoma detection rate, and overall cost.
    Atia MA; Patel NC; Ratuapli SK; Boroff ES; Crowell MD; Gurudu SR; Faigel DO; Leighton JA; Ramirez FC
    Gastrointest Endosc; 2015 Aug; 82(2):370-375.e1. PubMed ID: 25843614
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Impact of a real-time automatic quality control system on colorectal polyp and adenoma detection: a prospective randomized controlled study (with videos).
    Su JR; Li Z; Shao XJ; Ji CR; Ji R; Zhou RC; Li GC; Liu GQ; He YS; Zuo XL; Li YQ
    Gastrointest Endosc; 2020 Feb; 91(2):415-424.e4. PubMed ID: 31454493
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Retrograde inspection
    Rath T; Pfeifer L; Neufert C; Kremer A; Leppkes M; Hoffman A; Neurath MF; Zopf S
    World J Gastroenterol; 2020 Apr; 26(16):1962-1970. PubMed ID: 32390706
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A novel method with significant impact on adenoma detection: combined water-exchange and cap-assisted colonoscopy.
    Yen AW; Leung JW; Leung FW
    Gastrointest Endosc; 2013 Jun; 77(6):944-8. PubMed ID: 23473001
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Impact of withdrawal time on adenoma detection rate: results from a prospective multicenter trial.
    Desai M; Rex DK; Bohm ME; Davitkov P; DeWitt JM; Fischer M; Faulx G; Heath R; Imler TD; James-Stevenson TN; Kahi CJ; Kessler WR; Kohli DR; McHenry L; Rai T; Rogers NA; Sagi SV; Sathyamurthy A; Vennalaganti P; Sundaram S; Patel H; Higbee A; Kennedy K; Lahr R; Stojadinovikj G; Campbell C; Dasari C; Parasa S; Faulx A; Sharma P
    Gastrointest Endosc; 2023 Mar; 97(3):537-543.e2. PubMed ID: 36228700
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 15.