These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

99 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28907244)

  • 1. A Subject for Psychological Adjudication.
    J Psychol Med Ment Pathol; 1854 Apr; 7(26):296-297. PubMed ID: 28907244
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Central versus local adjudication of myocardial infarction in a cardiac biomarker trial.
    Smith SW; Diercks DB; Nagurney JT; Hollander JE; Miller CD; Schrock JW; Singer AJ; Apple FS; McCullough PA; Ruff CT; Sesma A; Peacock WF
    Am Heart J; 2013 Mar; 165(3):273-279.e1. PubMed ID: 23453092
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Rationale and design of a prospective substudy of clinical endpoint adjudication processes within an investigator-reported randomised controlled trial in patients with coronary artery disease: the GLOBAL LEADERS Adjudication Sub-StudY (GLASSY).
    Leonardi S; Franzone A; Piccolo R; McFadden E; Vranckx P; Serruys P; Benit E; Liebetrau C; Janssens L; Ferrario M; Zurakowski A; van Geuns RJ; Dominici M; Huber K; Slagboom T; Buszman P; Bolognese L; Tumscitz C; Bryniarski K; Aminian A; Vrolix M; Petrov I; Garg S; Naber C; Prokopczuk J; Hamm C; Steg G; Heg D; Juni P; Windecker S; Valgimigli M
    BMJ Open; 2019 Mar; 9(3):e026053. PubMed ID: 30852547
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Adjudicating outcomes: fundamentals.
    Vannabouathong C; Saccone M; Sprague S; Schemitsch EH; Bhandari M
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2012 Jul; 94 Suppl 1():70-4. PubMed ID: 22810452
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Do we need to adjudicate major clinical events?
    Granger CB; Vogel V; Cummings SR; Held P; Fiedorek F; Lawrence M; Neal B; Reidies H; Santarelli L; Schroyer R; Stockbridge NL; Feng Zhao
    Clin Trials; 2008; 5(1):56-60. PubMed ID: 18283081
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Rate of adjudication of radiological progression in rheumatoid arthritis randomized controlled trials depending on preset limits of agreement: a pooled analysis from 15 randomized trials.
    Navarro-Compán V; Landewé R; Ahmad HA; Miller CG; Xu D; Wolterbeek R; van der Heijde D
    Rheumatology (Oxford); 2013 Aug; 52(8):1404-7. PubMed ID: 23329683
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Use of endpoint adjudication to improve the quality and validity of endpoint assessment for medical device development and post marketing evaluation: Rationale and best practices. A report from the cardiac safety research consortium.
    Seltzer JH; Heise T; Carson P; Canos D; Hiatt JC; Vranckx P; Christen T; Cutlip DE
    Am Heart J; 2017 Aug; 190():76-85. PubMed ID: 28760216
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Architecture design of a generic centralized adjudication module integrated in a web-based clinical trial management system.
    Zhao W; Pauls K
    Clin Trials; 2016 Apr; 13(2):223-33. PubMed ID: 26464429
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Alignment of site versus adjudication committee-based diagnosis with patient outcomes: Insights from the Providing Rapid Out of Hospital Acute Cardiovascular Treatment 3 trial.
    Sepehrvand N; Zheng Y; Armstrong PW; Welsh R; Goodman SG; Tymchak W; Khadour F; Chan M; Weiss D; Ezekowitz JA
    Clin Trials; 2016 Apr; 13(2):140-8. PubMed ID: 26289822
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Adjudication-related processes are underreported and lack standardization in clinical trials of venous thromboembolism: a systematic review.
    Stuck AK; Fuhrer E; Limacher A; Méan M; Aujesky D
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2014 Mar; 67(3):278-84. PubMed ID: 24290147
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Clinical endpoint adjudication in a contemporary all-comers coronary stent investigation: methodology and external validation.
    Vranckx P; McFadden E; Cutlip DE; Mehran R; Swart M; Kint PP; Zijlstra F; Silber S; Windecker S; Serruys PW
    Contemp Clin Trials; 2013 Jan; 34(1):53-9. PubMed ID: 22975439
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Evaluating the benefit of event adjudication of cardiovascular outcomes in large simple RCTs.
    Pogue J; Walter SD; Yusuf S
    Clin Trials; 2009 Jun; 6(3):239-51. PubMed ID: 19528133
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. When do we need clinical endpoint adjudication in clinical trials?
    Held C
    Ups J Med Sci; 2019 Jan; 124(1):42-45. PubMed ID: 30427257
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A comparison of approaches for adjudicating outcomes in clinical trials.
    Kahan BC; Feagan B; Jairath V
    Trials; 2017 Jun; 18(1):266. PubMed ID: 28595589
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Local versus central assessment of venographies in a multicenter trial on the prevention of deep vein thrombosis in neurosurgery.
    Rossi R; Agnelli G; Taborelli P; Fioroni C; Zerbi D; Pattacini P; Giugni E; Bagatella P; Vaccarino A
    Thromb Haemost; 1999 Nov; 82(5):1399-402. PubMed ID: 10595626
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Measuring clinical bleeding using a standardized daily report form and a computer algorithm for adjudication of WHO bleeding grades.
    Middelburg RA; Ypma PF; van der Meer PF; van Wordragen-Vlaswinkel RJ; Eissen O; Kerkhoffs JL
    Vox Sang; 2013 Aug; 105(2):144-9. PubMed ID: 23517250
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Congestive heart failure incidence and prognosis: case identification using central adjudication versus hospital discharge diagnoses.
    Schellenbaum GD; Heckbert SR; Smith NL; Rea TD; Lumley T; Kitzman DW; Roger VL; Taylor HA; Psaty BM
    Ann Epidemiol; 2006 Feb; 16(2):115-22. PubMed ID: 15964203
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The Inaccuracy of Patient Recall for COPD Exacerbation Rate Estimation and Its Implications: Results from Central Adjudication.
    Frei A; Siebeling L; Wolters C; Held L; Muggensturm P; Strassmann A; Zoller M; Ter Riet G; Puhan MA
    Chest; 2016 Oct; 150(4):860-868. PubMed ID: 27400907
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Phone and Video-Based Modalities of Central Blinded Adjudication of Modified Rankin Scores in an Endovascular Stroke Trial.
    López-Cancio E; Salvat M; Cerdà N; Jiménez M; Codas J; Llull L; Boned S; Cano LM; Lara B; Molina C; Cobo E; Dávalos A; Jovin TG; Serena J;
    Stroke; 2015 Dec; 46(12):3405-10. PubMed ID: 26542697
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Centralized adjudication of cardiovascular end points in cardiovascular and noncardiovascular pharmacologic trials: a report from the Cardiac Safety Research Consortium.
    Seltzer JH; Turner JR; Geiger MJ; Rosano G; Mahaffey KW; White WB; Sabol MB; Stockbridge N; Sager PT
    Am Heart J; 2015 Feb; 169(2):197-204. PubMed ID: 25641528
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.