These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
4. A randomized trial of intrapartum electronic fetal heart rate monitoring versus intermittent auscultation. Vintzileos AM; Antsaklis A; Varvarigos I; Papas C; Sofatzis I; Montgomery JT Obstet Gynecol; 1993 Jun; 81(6):899-907. PubMed ID: 8497353 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. [Clinical use of central electronic monitoring system]. Guo X; Xu H; Xie K Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2000 Jan; 35(1):17-9. PubMed ID: 11831942 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Monitoring intrapartum fetal heart rates by mothers in labour in two public hospitals: an initiative to improve maternal and neonatal healthcare in Liberia. Borzie K; Jasper N; Southall DP; MacDonald R; Kola AA; Dolo O; Magnus A; Watson SD; Casement M; Dahn B; Jallah W BMC Pregnancy Childbirth; 2020 Jun; 20(1):362. PubMed ID: 32536345 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. [Modality of fetal heart monitoring during labor (continuous or intermittent), telemetry and central fetal monitoring]. Bretelle F; Le Du R; Foulhy C J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris); 2008 Feb; 37 Suppl 1():S23-33. PubMed ID: 18187266 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Intrapartum electronic fetal heart rate monitoring versus intermittent auscultation: a meta-analysis. Vintzileos AM; Nochimson DJ; Guzman ER; Knuppel RA; Lake M; Schifrin BS Obstet Gynecol; 1995 Jan; 85(1):149-55. PubMed ID: 7800313 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Intermittent Auscultation for Intrapartum Fetal Heart Rate Surveillance: American College of Nurse-Midwives. J Midwifery Womens Health; 2015; 60(5):626-32. PubMed ID: 26461195 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Fetal distress and the condition of newborn infants. Sykes GS; Molloy PM; Johnson P; Stirrat GM; Turnbull AC Br Med J (Clin Res Ed); 1983 Oct; 287(6397):943-5. PubMed ID: 6412897 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Intrapartum electronic fetal monitoring in low-risk pregnancies. Westgren M; Ingemarsson E; Ingemarsson I; Solum T Obstet Gynecol; 1980 Sep; 56(3):301-4. PubMed ID: 7422168 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Cardiotocography versus intermittent auscultation of fetal heart on admission to labour ward for assessment of fetal wellbeing. Devane D; Lalor JG; Daly S; McGuire W; Smith V Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2012 Feb; (2):CD005122. PubMed ID: 22336808 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Intermittent auscultation of the fetal heart rate during labor: an opportunity for shared decision making. Hersh S; Megregian M; Emeis C J Midwifery Womens Health; 2014; 59(3):344-9. PubMed ID: 24758413 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Auscultation of the fetal heart presents advantages over electronic monitoring. Sandmire HF; DeMott RK Wis Med J; 1995 Dec; 94(12):661-3. PubMed ID: 8571614 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Electronic fetal heart rate monitoring: early neonatal outcomes associated with normal rate, fetal stress, and fetal distress. Dellinger EH; Boehm FH; Crane MM Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2000 Jan; 182(1 Pt 1):214-20. PubMed ID: 10649181 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. An assessment of continuous fetal heart rate monitoring in labor. A randomized trial. Kelso IM; Parsons RJ; Lawrence GF; Arora SS; Edmonds DK; Cooke ID Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1978 Jul; 131(5):526-32. PubMed ID: 677195 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The importance of the learning process in ST analysis interpretation and its impact in improving clinical and neonatal outcomes. Timonen S; Holmberg K Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2018 Jun; 218(6):620.e1-620.e7. PubMed ID: 29577914 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]