These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

94 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28910657)

  • 1. The use of real-time feedback to improve kinematic marker placement consistency among novice examiners.
    Macaulay CAJ; Osis ST; Clermont C; Ferber R
    Gait Posture; 2017 Oct; 58():440-445. PubMed ID: 28910657
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Effects of Simulated Marker Placement Deviations on Running Kinematics and Evaluation of a Morphometric-Based Placement Feedback Method.
    Osis ST; Hettinga BA; Macdonald S; Ferber R
    PLoS One; 2016; 11(1):e0147111. PubMed ID: 26765846
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Can the reliability of three-dimensional running kinematics be improved using functional joint methodology?
    Pohl MB; Lloyd C; Ferber R
    Gait Posture; 2010 Oct; 32(4):559-63. PubMed ID: 20732816
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Evaluation of lower limb and pelvic marker placement precision among different evaluators and its impact on gait kinematics computed with the Conventional Gait Model.
    Fonseca M; Gasparutto X; Grouvel G; Bonnefoy-Mazure A; Dumas R; Armand S
    Gait Posture; 2023 Jul; 104():22-30. PubMed ID: 37307761
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The effect of toe marker placement error on joint kinematics and muscle forces using OpenSim gait simulation.
    Xu H; Merryweather A; Bloswick D; Mao Q; Wang T
    Biomed Mater Eng; 2015; 26 Suppl 1():S685-91. PubMed ID: 26406064
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The effect of subject measurement error on joint kinematics in the conventional gait model: Insights from the open-source pyCGM tool using high performance computing methods.
    Schwartz M; Dixon PC
    PLoS One; 2018; 13(1):e0189984. PubMed ID: 29293565
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. An expert system feedback tool improves the reliability of clinical gait kinematics for older adults with lower limb osteoarthritis.
    Osis ST; Kobsar D; Leigh RJ; Macaulay CAJ; Ferber R
    Gait Posture; 2017 Oct; 58():261-267. PubMed ID: 28825998
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Improving between-day kinematic reliability using a marker placement device.
    Noehren B; Manal K; Davis I
    J Orthop Res; 2010 Nov; 28(11):1405-10. PubMed ID: 20872574
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Does tester experience influence the reliability with which 3D gait kinematics are collected in healthy adults?
    Leigh RJ; Pohl MB; Ferber R
    Phys Ther Sport; 2014 May; 15(2):112-6. PubMed ID: 23988839
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The Effect of Examiner Variability on Multiple Canine Stifle Kinematic Gait Collections in a 3-Dimensional Model.
    Torres BT; Gilbert PJ; Reynolds LR; Fu YC; Navik JA; Sornborger A; Budsberg SC
    Vet Surg; 2015 Jul; 44(5):581-7. PubMed ID: 25475483
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The efficacy of a video-based marker-less tracking system for gait analysis.
    Ong A; Harris IS; Hamill J
    Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin; 2017 Aug; 20(10):1089-1095. PubMed ID: 28569549
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The influence of tester experience on the reliability of 3D kinematic information during running.
    Sinclair J; Hebron J; Taylor PJ
    Gait Posture; 2014 Sep; 40(4):707-11. PubMed ID: 25022594
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Reliability testing of the heel marker in three-dimensional gait analysis.
    McCahill J; Schallig W; Stebbins J; Prescott R; Theologis T; Harlaar J
    Gait Posture; 2021 Mar; 85():84-87. PubMed ID: 33517041
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A novel device for improving marker placement accuracy.
    Telfer S; Morlan G; Hyslop E; Semple R; Rafferty D; Woodburn J
    Gait Posture; 2010 Oct; 32(4):536-9. PubMed ID: 20719514
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Reliability and minimal detectable difference in multisegment foot kinematics during shod walking and running.
    Milner CE; Brindle RA
    Gait Posture; 2016 Jan; 43():192-7. PubMed ID: 26471323
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Reliability of sagittal plane hip, knee, and ankle joint angles from a single frame of video data using the GAITRite camera system.
    Ross SA; Rice C; Von Behren K; Meyer A; Alexander R; Murfin S
    Physiother Theory Pract; 2015 Jan; 31(1):53-60. PubMed ID: 25230893
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Can the evaluation of marker placement confidence be used as an indicator of gait kinematic variability?
    Fonseca M; Gasparutto X; Lena C; Grouvel G; Bonnefoy-Mazure A; Dumas R; Armand S
    Front Rehabil Sci; 2023; 4():1122303. PubMed ID: 37496701
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Effect of tibia marker placement on knee joint kinematic analysis.
    Wen Y; Huang H; Yu Y; Zhang S; Yang J; Ao Y; Xia S
    Gait Posture; 2018 Feb; 60():99-103. PubMed ID: 29175641
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Sensitivity of the OLGA and VCM models to erroneous marker placement: effects on 3D-gait kinematics.
    Groen BE; Geurts M; Nienhuis B; Duysens J
    Gait Posture; 2012 Mar; 35(3):517-21. PubMed ID: 22245226
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. An alternative whole-body marker set to accurately and reliably quantify joint kinematics during load carriage.
    Lenton GK; Doyle TLA; Saxby DJ; Lloyd DG
    Gait Posture; 2017 May; 54():318-324. PubMed ID: 28411551
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.