These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
133 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28910948)
21. Testing the risk of bias tool showed low reliability between individual reviewers and across consensus assessments of reviewer pairs. Hartling L; Hamm MP; Milne A; Vandermeer B; Santaguida PL; Ansari M; Tsertsvadze A; Hempel S; Shekelle P; Dryden DM J Clin Epidemiol; 2013 Sep; 66(9):973-81. PubMed ID: 22981249 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Reducing the risk of bias in health behaviour change trials: improving trial design, reporting or bias assessment criteria? A review and case study. de Bruin M; McCambridge J; Prins JM Psychol Health; 2015 Jan; 30(1):8-34. PubMed ID: 25112431 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. The revised JBI critical appraisal tool for the assessment of risk of bias for randomized controlled trials. Barker TH; Stone JC; Sears K; Klugar M; Tufanaru C; Leonardi-Bee J; Aromataris E; Munn Z JBI Evid Synth; 2023 Mar; 21(3):494-506. PubMed ID: 36727247 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. A Risk of Bias Assessment of Randomized Controlled Trials (RCTs) on Periodontal Regeneration Published in 2013. Elangovan S; Prakasam S; Gajendrareddy P; Allareddy V J Evid Based Dent Pract; 2016 Mar; 16(1):30-40. PubMed ID: 27132553 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. [Risk of bias assessment: (8) Risk of Bias in Systematic Review (ROBIS)]. Hu J; Sun F; Zhan SY Zhonghua Liu Xing Bing Xue Za Zhi; 2018 Aug; 39(8):1125-1129. PubMed ID: 30180441 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Randomized clinical trials of dental bleaching - Compliance with the CONSORT Statement: a systematic review. Loguercio AD; Maran BM; Hanzen TA; Paula AM; Perdigão J; Reis A Braz Oral Res; 2017 Aug; 31(suppl 1):e60. PubMed ID: 28902240 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. An Assessment of the Risk of Bias in Randomized Controlled Trial Reports Published in Prosthodontic and Implant Dentistry Journals. Papageorgiou SN; Kloukos D; Petridis H; Pandis N Int J Prosthodont; 2015; 28(6):586-93. PubMed ID: 26523717 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Risk of bias and methodological issues in randomised controlled trials of acupuncture for knee osteoarthritis: a cross-sectional study. Jia P; Tang L; Yu J; Lee AH; Zhou X; Kang D; Luo Y; Liu J; Sun X BMJ Open; 2018 Mar; 8(3):e019847. PubMed ID: 29511016 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Methods of quality assurance in multicenter trials in laparoscopic colorectal surgery: a systematic review. Foster JD; Mackenzie H; Nelson H; Hanna GB; Francis NK Ann Surg; 2014 Aug; 260(2):220-9. PubMed ID: 24743623 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Risk of bias assessment of clinical trials published in iberoamerican urological journals. García-Perdomo HA; Díaz-Hung AM; Mejía LM Arch Esp Urol; 2015 Sep; 68(7):615-26. PubMed ID: 26331398 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. [Risk on bias assessment: (6) A Revised Tool for the Quality Assessment on Diagnostic Accuracy Studies (QUADAS-2)]. Qu YJ; Yang ZR; Sun F; Zhan SY Zhonghua Liu Xing Bing Xue Za Zhi; 2018 Apr; 39(4):524-531. PubMed ID: 29699051 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. The PEDro scale had acceptably high convergent validity, construct validity, and interrater reliability in evaluating methodological quality of pharmaceutical trials. Yamato TP; Maher C; Koes B; Moseley A J Clin Epidemiol; 2017 Jun; 86():176-181. PubMed ID: 28288916 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Assessing baseline imbalance in randomised trials: implications for the Cochrane risk of bias tool. Corbett MS; Higgins JP; Woolacott NF Res Synth Methods; 2014 Mar; 5(1):79-85. PubMed ID: 26054027 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Blinding in randomized controlled trials in general and abdominal surgery: protocol for a systematic review and empirical study. Probst P; Grummich K; Heger P; Zaschke S; Knebel P; Ulrich A; Büchler MW; Diener MK Syst Rev; 2016 Mar; 5():48. PubMed ID: 27012940 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Assessments of the quality of randomized controlled trials published in International Journal of Urology from 1994 to 2011. Cho HJ; Chung JH; Jo JK; Kang DH; Cho JM; Yoo TK; Lee SW Int J Urol; 2013 Dec; 20(12):1212-9. PubMed ID: 23573913 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Clinical trial registration was not an indicator for low risk of bias. Farquhar CM; Showell MG; Showell EAE; Beetham P; Baak N; Mourad S; Jordan VMB J Clin Epidemiol; 2017 Apr; 84():47-53. PubMed ID: 28088595 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Inclusion of nonrandomized studies in Cochrane systematic reviews was found to be in need of improvement. Ijaz S; Verbeek JH; Mischke C; Ruotsalainen J J Clin Epidemiol; 2014 Jun; 67(6):645-53. PubMed ID: 24725644 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Can trial quality be reliably assessed from published reports of cancer trials: evaluation of risk of bias assessments in systematic reviews. Vale CL; Tierney JF; Burdett S BMJ; 2013 Apr; 346():f1798. PubMed ID: 23610376 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Assessment of study quality for systematic reviews: a comparison of the Cochrane Collaboration Risk of Bias Tool and the Effective Public Health Practice Project Quality Assessment Tool: methodological research. Armijo-Olivo S; Stiles CR; Hagen NA; Biondo PD; Cummings GG J Eval Clin Pract; 2012 Feb; 18(1):12-8. PubMed ID: 20698919 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]