These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

257 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28911792)

  • 1. Facial profile and frontal changes after bimaxillary surgery in patients with mandibular prognathism.
    Chen CM; Chen MY; Cheng JH; Chen KJ; Tseng YC
    J Formos Med Assoc; 2018 Jul; 117(7):632-639. PubMed ID: 28911792
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The Changes of Cheek Line (Lateral) and Face Line (Frontal) after Correction of Mandibular Prognathism.
    Tseng YC; Cheng JH; Chen MY; Chen KJ; Chen CM
    Biomed Res Int; 2018; 2018():4926528. PubMed ID: 29992146
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A retrospective analysis of the stability and relapse of soft and hard tissue change after bilateral sagittal split osteotomy for mandibular setback of 64 Taiwanese patients.
    Chou JI; Fong HJ; Kuang SH; Gi LY; Hwang FY; Lai YC; Chang RC; Kao SY
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2005 Mar; 63(3):355-61. PubMed ID: 15742287
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Soft-tissue profile changes after orthognathic surgery of mandibular prognathism.
    Chen CM; Lai S; Lee HE; Chen KK; Hsu KJ
    Kaohsiung J Med Sci; 2012 Apr; 28(4):216-9. PubMed ID: 22453070
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Changes in the transverse dimensions by vertical ramus osteotomy after mandibular prognathism correction.
    Lee KT; Lai SS; Lin SS; Wu JH; Lee HE; Chen CM
    J Craniofac Surg; 2011 Sep; 22(5):1602-5. PubMed ID: 21959396
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Evaluation of soft tissue profile following intraoral ramus osteotomy in Chinese adults with mandibular prognathism.
    Lew KK; Loh FC; Yeo JF; Loh HS
    Int J Adult Orthodon Orthognath Surg; 1990; 5(3):189-97. PubMed ID: 2098455
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Effect of mandibular setback via bilateral sagittal split ramus osteotomy on transverse displacement of the proximal segment.
    Choi HS; Rebellato J; Yoon HJ; Lund BA
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2005 Jul; 63(7):908-16. PubMed ID: 16003615
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Appearance on face reading (cheek line) after orthognathic surgery.
    Tseng YC; Chen HJ; Cheng JH; Chen PH; Pan CY; Chou ST; Chen CM
    Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2018 Jun; 56(5):394-400. PubMed ID: 29657072
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Changes in soft tissue profile after sagittal split ramus osteotomy and retropositioning of the mandible.
    Gaggl A; Schultes G; Kärcher H
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 1999 May; 57(5):542-6; discussion 546-7. PubMed ID: 10319828
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparative study of skeletal stability between bicortical resorbable and titanium screw fixation after sagittal split ramus osteotomy for mandibular prognathism.
    Paeng JY; Hong J; Kim CS; Kim MJ
    J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2012 Dec; 40(8):660-4. PubMed ID: 22209495
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Stability of hard tissue profile after mandibular setback in sagittal split osteotomies: a longitudinal and long-term follow-up study.
    Joss CU; Thüer UW
    Eur J Orthod; 2008 Aug; 30(4):352-8. PubMed ID: 18678756
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Obwegeser II osteotomy (transoral angle osteotomy) for open bite with skeletal class III deformity.
    Kwon TG; Na K; Lee SH
    J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2014 Oct; 42(7):1382-8. PubMed ID: 24787080
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Bilateral sagittal split osteotomy for correction of mandibular prognathism: long-term results.
    de Villa GH; Huang CS; Chen PK; Chen YR
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2005 Nov; 63(11):1584-92. PubMed ID: 16243174
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Soft and hard tissue changes after bimaxillary surgery in Turkish female Class III patients.
    Marşan G; Cura N; Emekli U
    J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2009 Jan; 37(1):8-17. PubMed ID: 18786833
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Soft tissue profile changes following mandibular advancement and setback surgery an average of 12 years postoperatively.
    Eggensperger NM; Lieger O; Thüer U; Iizuka T
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2007 Nov; 65(11):2301-10. PubMed ID: 17954329
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Skeletal changes after modified intraoral vertical ramus osteotomy for correction of mandibular prognathism.
    Lai SS; Tseng YC; Huang IY; Yang YH; Shen YS; Chen CM
    J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg; 2007; 60(2):139-45. PubMed ID: 17223511
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Skeletal relapse after mandibular advancement and setback in single-jaw surgery.
    Eggensperger N; Smolka W; Rahal A; Iizuka T
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2004 Dec; 62(12):1486-96. PubMed ID: 15573348
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Plate fixation of extra-oral subcondylar ramus osteotomy for correction of mandibular prognathism: clinical aspects and short term stability.
    Høgevold HE; Mobarak KA; Espeland L; Krogstad O; Skjelbred P
    J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2001 Aug; 29(4):205-11; discussion 212-3. PubMed ID: 11562089
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Orthognathic surgery for correction of patients with mandibular excess: don't forget to assess the gonial angle.
    Guglielmi M; Schneider KM; Iannetti G; Feng C; Martinez AY
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2013 Jun; 71(6):1063-72. PubMed ID: 23541992
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Clinical significance of postoperative skeletal relapse in the treatment of mandibular prognathism: Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis.
    Chen CM; Hsu HJ; Hsu KJ; Tseng YC
    J Formos Med Assoc; 2022 Dec; 121(12):2593-2600. PubMed ID: 35843789
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.