174 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28911877)
1. Validity and reliability of naturalistic driving scene categorization Judgments from crowdsourcing.
Cabrall CDD; Lu Z; Kyriakidis M; Manca L; Dijksterhuis C; Happee R; de Winter J
Accid Anal Prev; 2018 May; 114():25-33. PubMed ID: 28911877
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Web 2.0-based crowdsourcing for high-quality gold standard development in clinical natural language processing.
Zhai H; Lingren T; Deleger L; Li Q; Kaiser M; Stoutenborough L; Solti I
J Med Internet Res; 2013 Apr; 15(4):e73. PubMed ID: 23548263
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Toward a crowdsourcing solution to identify high-risk highway segments through mining driving jerks.
Li X; Mousavi SM; Dadashova B; Lord D; Wolshon B
Accid Anal Prev; 2021 Jun; 155():106101. PubMed ID: 33848812
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Validity of Online Screening for Autism: Crowdsourcing Study Comparing Paid and Unpaid Diagnostic Tasks.
Washington P; Kalantarian H; Tariq Q; Schwartz J; Dunlap K; Chrisman B; Varma M; Ning M; Kline A; Stockham N; Paskov K; Voss C; Haber N; Wall DP
J Med Internet Res; 2019 May; 21(5):e13668. PubMed ID: 31124463
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A study of crowdsourced segment-level surgical skill assessment using pairwise rankings.
Malpani A; Vedula SS; Chen CC; Hager GD
Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg; 2015 Sep; 10(9):1435-47. PubMed ID: 26133652
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. AggNet: Deep Learning From Crowds for Mitosis Detection in Breast Cancer Histology Images.
Albarqouni S; Baur C; Achilles F; Belagiannis V; Demirci S; Navab N
IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2016 May; 35(5):1313-21. PubMed ID: 26891484
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Crowdsourcing image annotation for nucleus detection and segmentation in computational pathology: evaluating experts, automated methods, and the crowd.
Irshad H; Montaser-Kouhsari L; Waltz G; Bucur O; Nowak JA; Dong F; Knoblauch NW; Beck AH
Pac Symp Biocomput; 2015; ():294-305. PubMed ID: 25592590
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Crowdsourcing for Food Purchase Receipt Annotation via Amazon Mechanical Turk: A Feasibility Study.
Lu W; Guttentag A; Elbel B; Kiszko K; Abrams C; Kirchner TR
J Med Internet Res; 2019 Apr; 21(4):e12047. PubMed ID: 30950801
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Frustration and ennui among Amazon MTurk workers.
Fowler C; Jiao J; Pitts M
Behav Res Methods; 2023 Sep; 55(6):3009-3025. PubMed ID: 36018485
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Reliability of crowdsourcing as a method for collecting emotions labels on pictures.
Korovina O; Baez M; Casati F
BMC Res Notes; 2019 Oct; 12(1):715. PubMed ID: 31666124
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Improving Consensus Scoring of Crowdsourced Data Using the Rasch Model: Development and Refinement of a Diagnostic Instrument.
Brady CJ; Mudie LI; Wang X; Guallar E; Friedman DS
J Med Internet Res; 2017 Jun; 19(6):e222. PubMed ID: 28634154
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Development and validation of a vision and night driving questionnaire.
Kimlin JA; Black AA; Djaja N; Wood JM
Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2016 Jul; 36(4):465-76. PubMed ID: 27350185
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Crowdsourcing data collection of the retail tobacco environment: case study comparing data from crowdsourced workers to trained data collectors.
Kim AE; Lieberman AJ; Dench D
Tob Control; 2015 Mar; 24(e1):e6-9. PubMed ID: 24500265
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Finding the experts in the crowd: Validity and reliability of crowdsourced measures of children's gradient speech contrasts.
Harel D; Hitchcock ER; Szeredi D; Ortiz J; McAllister Byun T
Clin Linguist Phon; 2017; 31(1):104-117. PubMed ID: 27267258
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Crowdsourcing critical appraisal of research evidence (CrowdCARE) was found to be a valid approach to assessing clinical research quality.
Pianta MJ; Makrai E; Verspoor KM; Cohn TA; Downie LE
J Clin Epidemiol; 2018 Dec; 104():8-14. PubMed ID: 30075189
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The value of site-based observations complementary to naturalistic driving observations: a pilot study on the right turn manoeuvre.
van Nes N; Christoph M; Hoedemaeker M; van der Horst RA
Accid Anal Prev; 2013 Sep; 58():318-29. PubMed ID: 23915473
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Does agreement mean accuracy? Evaluating glance annotation in naturalistic driving data.
Jansen RJ; van der Kint ST; Hermens F
Behav Res Methods; 2021 Feb; 53(1):430-446. PubMed ID: 32728917
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Rapid grading of fundus photographs for diabetic retinopathy using crowdsourcing.
Brady CJ; Villanti AC; Pearson JL; Kirchner TR; Gupta OP; Shah CP
J Med Internet Res; 2014 Oct; 16(10):e233. PubMed ID: 25356929
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Development and Validation of a Comprehensive Well-Being Scale for People in the University Environment (Pitt Wellness Scale) Using a Crowdsourcing Approach: Cross-Sectional Study.
Zhou L; Parmanto B
J Med Internet Res; 2020 Apr; 22(4):e15075. PubMed ID: 32347801
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Harnessing the power of crowds: crowdsourcing as a novel research method for evaluation of acne treatments.
Armstrong AW; Cheeney S; Wu J; Harskamp CT; Schupp CW
Am J Clin Dermatol; 2012 Dec; 13(6):405-16. PubMed ID: 23039257
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
