These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
171 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28911877)
1. Validity and reliability of naturalistic driving scene categorization Judgments from crowdsourcing. Cabrall CDD; Lu Z; Kyriakidis M; Manca L; Dijksterhuis C; Happee R; de Winter J Accid Anal Prev; 2018 May; 114():25-33. PubMed ID: 28911877 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Web 2.0-based crowdsourcing for high-quality gold standard development in clinical natural language processing. Zhai H; Lingren T; Deleger L; Li Q; Kaiser M; Stoutenborough L; Solti I J Med Internet Res; 2013 Apr; 15(4):e73. PubMed ID: 23548263 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Toward a crowdsourcing solution to identify high-risk highway segments through mining driving jerks. Li X; Mousavi SM; Dadashova B; Lord D; Wolshon B Accid Anal Prev; 2021 Jun; 155():106101. PubMed ID: 33848812 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A study of crowdsourced segment-level surgical skill assessment using pairwise rankings. Malpani A; Vedula SS; Chen CC; Hager GD Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg; 2015 Sep; 10(9):1435-47. PubMed ID: 26133652 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. AggNet: Deep Learning From Crowds for Mitosis Detection in Breast Cancer Histology Images. Albarqouni S; Baur C; Achilles F; Belagiannis V; Demirci S; Navab N IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2016 May; 35(5):1313-21. PubMed ID: 26891484 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Validity of Online Screening for Autism: Crowdsourcing Study Comparing Paid and Unpaid Diagnostic Tasks. Washington P; Kalantarian H; Tariq Q; Schwartz J; Dunlap K; Chrisman B; Varma M; Ning M; Kline A; Stockham N; Paskov K; Voss C; Haber N; Wall DP J Med Internet Res; 2019 May; 21(5):e13668. PubMed ID: 31124463 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Crowdsourcing image annotation for nucleus detection and segmentation in computational pathology: evaluating experts, automated methods, and the crowd. Irshad H; Montaser-Kouhsari L; Waltz G; Bucur O; Nowak JA; Dong F; Knoblauch NW; Beck AH Pac Symp Biocomput; 2015; ():294-305. PubMed ID: 25592590 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Crowdsourcing for Food Purchase Receipt Annotation via Amazon Mechanical Turk: A Feasibility Study. Lu W; Guttentag A; Elbel B; Kiszko K; Abrams C; Kirchner TR J Med Internet Res; 2019 Apr; 21(4):e12047. PubMed ID: 30950801 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Frustration and ennui among Amazon MTurk workers. Fowler C; Jiao J; Pitts M Behav Res Methods; 2023 Sep; 55(6):3009-3025. PubMed ID: 36018485 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Reliability of crowdsourcing as a method for collecting emotions labels on pictures. Korovina O; Baez M; Casati F BMC Res Notes; 2019 Oct; 12(1):715. PubMed ID: 31666124 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Improving Consensus Scoring of Crowdsourced Data Using the Rasch Model: Development and Refinement of a Diagnostic Instrument. Brady CJ; Mudie LI; Wang X; Guallar E; Friedman DS J Med Internet Res; 2017 Jun; 19(6):e222. PubMed ID: 28634154 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Development and validation of a vision and night driving questionnaire. Kimlin JA; Black AA; Djaja N; Wood JM Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2016 Jul; 36(4):465-76. PubMed ID: 27350185 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Crowdsourcing data collection of the retail tobacco environment: case study comparing data from crowdsourced workers to trained data collectors. Kim AE; Lieberman AJ; Dench D Tob Control; 2015 Mar; 24(e1):e6-9. PubMed ID: 24500265 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Finding the experts in the crowd: Validity and reliability of crowdsourced measures of children's gradient speech contrasts. Harel D; Hitchcock ER; Szeredi D; Ortiz J; McAllister Byun T Clin Linguist Phon; 2017; 31(1):104-117. PubMed ID: 27267258 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Crowdsourcing critical appraisal of research evidence (CrowdCARE) was found to be a valid approach to assessing clinical research quality. Pianta MJ; Makrai E; Verspoor KM; Cohn TA; Downie LE J Clin Epidemiol; 2018 Dec; 104():8-14. PubMed ID: 30075189 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The value of site-based observations complementary to naturalistic driving observations: a pilot study on the right turn manoeuvre. van Nes N; Christoph M; Hoedemaeker M; van der Horst RA Accid Anal Prev; 2013 Sep; 58():318-29. PubMed ID: 23915473 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Does agreement mean accuracy? Evaluating glance annotation in naturalistic driving data. Jansen RJ; van der Kint ST; Hermens F Behav Res Methods; 2021 Feb; 53(1):430-446. PubMed ID: 32728917 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Rapid grading of fundus photographs for diabetic retinopathy using crowdsourcing. Brady CJ; Villanti AC; Pearson JL; Kirchner TR; Gupta OP; Shah CP J Med Internet Res; 2014 Oct; 16(10):e233. PubMed ID: 25356929 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Development and Validation of a Comprehensive Well-Being Scale for People in the University Environment (Pitt Wellness Scale) Using a Crowdsourcing Approach: Cross-Sectional Study. Zhou L; Parmanto B J Med Internet Res; 2020 Apr; 22(4):e15075. PubMed ID: 32347801 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Harnessing the power of crowds: crowdsourcing as a novel research method for evaluation of acne treatments. Armstrong AW; Cheeney S; Wu J; Harskamp CT; Schupp CW Am J Clin Dermatol; 2012 Dec; 13(6):405-16. PubMed ID: 23039257 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]