87 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2891285)
1. Contrast agent nephrotoxicity: comparison of ionic and nonionic contrast agents.
Stacul F; Carraro M; Magnaldi S; Faccini L; Guarnieri G; Dalla Palma L
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1987 Dec; 149(6):1287-9. PubMed ID: 2891285
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Nephrotoxicity of high and low osmolar contrast media: case control studies following digital subtraction angiography in potential risk patients.
Scherberich JE; Fischer A; Rautschka E; Kollath J; Riemann H
Fortschr Geb Rontgenstrahlen Nuklearmed Erganzungsbd; 1989; 128():91-4. PubMed ID: 2568816
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Renal and hepatic tolerance of nonionic and ionic contrast media in intravenous digital subtraction angiography.
Langer M; Junge W; Keysser R; Hasford J; Jänicke UA
Fortschr Geb Rontgenstrahlen Nuklearmed Erganzungsbd; 1989; 128():95-100. PubMed ID: 2568817
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Nephrotoxicity of nonionic low-osmolality versus ionic high-osmolality contrast media: a prospective double-blind randomized comparison in human beings.
Katholi RE; Taylor GJ; Woods WT; Womack KA; Katholi CR; McCann WP; Moses HW; Dove JT; Mikell FL; Woodruff RC
Radiology; 1993 Jan; 186(1):183-7. PubMed ID: 8416561
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. [Cardiac complications of intravenous digital angiography. Comparison of ionic and nonionic contrast media].
Stacul F; Marass P; Pozzi Mucelli R; Predonzan F; Magnaldi S; Abbona M
Radiol Med; 1985; 71(1-2):40-3. PubMed ID: 4023305
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Intravascular contrast media: effect of dose on renal function.
Miller DL; Chang R; Wells WT; Dowjat BA; Malinosky RM; Doppman JL
Radiology; 1988 Jun; 167(3):607-11. PubMed ID: 3363118
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Contrast nephrotoxicity: a randomized controlled trial of a nonionic and an ionic radiographic contrast agent.
Schwab SJ; Hlatky MA; Pieper KS; Davidson CJ; Morris KG; Skelton TN; Bashore TM
N Engl J Med; 1989 Jan; 320(3):149-53. PubMed ID: 2643042
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. [Contrast media in venous digital angiography: ionic or non-ionic?].
Stacul F; Magnaldi S; Pozzi-Mucelli R; Muner G; Dalla Palma L
Radiol Med; 1986 Nov; 72(11):815-22. PubMed ID: 3786845
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Tubular nephrotoxicity after intravenous urography with ionic high-osmolal and nonionic low-osmolal contrast media in patients with chronic renal insufficiency.
Cavaliere G; Arrigo G; D'Amico G; Bernasconi P; Schiavina G; Dellafiore L; Vergnaghi D
Nephron; 1987; 46(2):128-33. PubMed ID: 2885767
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Altered urinary beta 2-microglobulin excretion as an index of nephrotoxicity.
Rashad FA; Vacca CV; Speroff T; Hall PW
Kidney Int Suppl; 1991 Nov; 34():S18-20. PubMed ID: 1762326
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Nephrotoxicity from contrast media: attenuation with theophylline.
Katholi RE; Taylor GJ; McCann WP; Woods WT; Womack KA; McCoy CD; Katholi CR; Moses HW; Mishkel GJ; Lucore CL
Radiology; 1995 Apr; 195(1):17-22. PubMed ID: 7892462
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Iopamidol: new, nonionic contrast agent for excretory urography.
Thompson WM; Foster WL; Halvorsen RA; Dunnick NR; Rommel AJ; Bates M
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1984 Feb; 142(2):329-32. PubMed ID: 6607602
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Transfemoral digital subtraction aortography. Are diluted high osmolar contrast media acceptable?
Naisby GP; Owen JP; Alexander TW; Cope L; Laker MF; Hamilton PJ
Acta Radiol; 1991 Mar; 32(2):137-40. PubMed ID: 2031798
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Renal toxicity of contrast agents: iopamidol, iothalamate, and diatrizoate.
Gale ME; Robbins AH; Hamburger RJ; Widrich WC
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1984 Feb; 142(2):333-5. PubMed ID: 6607603
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Urinary protein excretion following intravenously administered ionic and non-ionic contrast media in man.
Skovgaard N; Holm J; Hemmingsen L; Skaarup P
Acta Radiol; 1989; 30(5):517-9. PubMed ID: 2692667
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Influence of an ionic and a nonionic (sodium meglumine diatrizoate and iopromide) x-ray contrast medium of hemorrheology.
Strecker EP; Stengel M; Witte S
Fortschr Geb Rontgenstrahlen Nuklearmed Erganzungsbd; 1989; 128():24-7. PubMed ID: 2568803
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Clinical superiority of a new nonionic contrast agent (iopamidol) for cardiac angiography.
Gertz EW; Wisneski JA; Chiu D; Akin JR; Hu C
J Am Coll Cardiol; 1985 Feb; 5(2 Pt 1):250-8. PubMed ID: 3881496
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Incidence of fibrillation with isotonic contrast media for intra-arterial coronary digital subtraction angiography.
Morris TW; Hayakawa K; Sahler LG; Ekholm S
Diagn Imaging Clin Med; 1986; 55(3):109-13. PubMed ID: 3522039
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Digital subtraction angiography. Comparison of meglumine-Na diatrizoate with iohexol.
Sackett JF; Bergsjordet B; Seeger JF; Cacayorin ED
Invest Radiol; 1985; 20(1 Suppl):S58-61. PubMed ID: 2579044
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Renal excretion of iopromide and iopamidol after intravenous administration in digital subtraction angiography.
Mützel W; Langer M; Keysser R
Fortschr Geb Rontgenstrahlen Nuklearmed Erganzungsbd; 1989; 128():101-4. PubMed ID: 2568774
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
