These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

149 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28913855)

  • 21. Influence of implant angulation and cyclic dislodging on the retentive force of two different overdenture attachments - an in vitro study.
    Srinivasan M; Schimmel M; Badoud I; Ammann P; Herrmann FR; Müller F
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2016 May; 27(5):604-11. PubMed ID: 26085188
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Attachment systems for mandibular single-implant overdentures: an in vitro retention force investigation on different designs.
    Alsabeeha N; Atieh M; Swain MV; Payne AG
    Int J Prosthodont; 2010; 23(2):160-6. PubMed ID: 20305857
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Comparison of retention and stability of implant-retained overdentures based upon implant number and distribution.
    Scherer MD; McGlumphy EA; Seghi RR; Campagni WV
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2013; 28(6):1619-28. PubMed ID: 24278931
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Retention forces of spherical attachments as a function of implant and matrix angulation in mandibular overdentures: an in vitro study.
    Ortegón SM; Thompson GA; Agar JR; Taylor TD; Perdikis D
    J Prosthet Dent; 2009 Apr; 101(4):231-8. PubMed ID: 19328276
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Retention characteristics of attachment systems for implant overdentures.
    Chung KH; Chung CY; Cagna DR; Cronin RJ
    J Prosthodont; 2004 Dec; 13(4):221-6. PubMed ID: 15610542
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. [Three-dimensional finite element analysis of four-implants supported mandibular overdentures using two different attachments].
    Jiang MY; Wen J; Xu SS; Liu TS; Sun HQ
    Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2019 Jan; 54(1):41-45. PubMed ID: 30630258
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Dislodgement force analysis of an overdenture attachment system.
    Yilmaz B; Ozkir E; Johnston WM; McGlumphy E
    J Prosthet Dent; 2020 Feb; 123(2):291-298. PubMed ID: 31202554
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Impact of implants number and attachment type on the peri-implant stresses and retention of palateless implant-retained overdenture.
    Hegazy SA; El Mekawy N; Emera RMK
    Indian J Dent Res; 2020; 31(3):414-419. PubMed ID: 32769276
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Effects of Excessive Implant Angulation on Retention of Two Types of Overdenture Attachments during Cyclic Loading.
    Teimoori H; Shayegh SS; Zavaree MA; Hakimaneh SM; Khodadad F; Shidfar S; Baghani MT
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2018 Oct; 19(10):1221-1227. PubMed ID: 30498177
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. The effect of denture cleansing solutions on the retention of pink locator attachments after multiple pulls: an in vitro study.
    You W; Masri R; Romberg E; Driscoll CF; You T
    J Prosthodont; 2011 Aug; 20(6):464-9. PubMed ID: 21777332
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. In vitro comparison of the retentive properties of ball and locator attachments for implant overdentures.
    Türk PE; Geckili O; Türk Y; Günay V; Bilgin T
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2014; 29(5):1106-13. PubMed ID: 25216136
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Effect of implant number on the movement of mandibular implant-supported overdentures under biting force: An in-vitro study.
    Zhang X; Liu W; Qing H; Pei X; Chen J; Wang J
    Quintessence Int; 2018; 49(9):709-717. PubMed ID: 29989109
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Retention and wear behaviors of two implant overdenture stud-type attachments at different implant angulations.
    Choi JW; Bae JH; Jeong CM; Huh JB
    J Prosthet Dent; 2017 May; 117(5):628-635. PubMed ID: 27863857
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Evaluation of the retention characteristics of various stud attachment systems for implant retained overdenture.
    Gonuldas F; Tokar E; Ozturk C
    Acta Bioeng Biomech; 2018; 20(4):135-141. PubMed ID: 30821291
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. An in vitro investigation into retention strength and fatigue resistance of various designs of tooth/implant supported overdentures.
    Fatalla AA; Song K; Du T; Cao Y
    J Huazhong Univ Sci Technolog Med Sci; 2012 Feb; 32(1):124-129. PubMed ID: 22282258
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Attachment systems for implant overdenture: influence of implant inclination on retentive and lateral forces.
    Yang TC; Maeda Y; Gonda T; Kotecha S
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2011 Nov; 22(11):1315-9. PubMed ID: 21426402
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Retention of mandibular implant-retained overdentures with two different attachment designs: An in vitro study.
    Ramadan RE; Mohamed FS
    J Prosthet Dent; 2020 May; 123(5):738.e1-738.e6. PubMed ID: 32165012
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Effect of Cyclic Dislodging on the Retention of Two Attachment Systems for Implant-supported Overdentures: An In Vitro Study.
    Tohme H; Makzoume J; Boulos P; Fakhoury J; Yared C; Salameh Z; Daou M
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2018 Nov; 19(11):1386-1392. PubMed ID: 30602646
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Mandibular Denture Base Deformation with Locator and Ball Attachments of Implant-Retained Overdentures.
    ELsyad MA; Errabti HM; Mustafa AZ
    J Prosthodont; 2016 Dec; 25(8):656-664. PubMed ID: 26376338
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Comparison of retention and strain energies of stud attachments for implant overdentures.
    Petropoulos VC; Mante FK
    J Prosthodont; 2011 Jun; 20(4):286-93. PubMed ID: 21539646
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.