432 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28913966)
1. Good practices for real-world data studies of treatment and/or comparative effectiveness: Recommendations from the joint ISPOR-ISPE Special Task Force on real-world evidence in health care decision making.
Berger ML; Sox H; Willke RJ; Brixner DL; Eichler HG; Goettsch W; Madigan D; Makady A; Schneeweiss S; Tarricone R; Wang SV; Watkins J; Daniel Mullins C
Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf; 2017 Sep; 26(9):1033-1039. PubMed ID: 28913966
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Good Practices for Real-World Data Studies of Treatment and/or Comparative Effectiveness: Recommendations from the Joint ISPOR-ISPE Special Task Force on Real-World Evidence in Health Care Decision Making.
Berger ML; Sox H; Willke RJ; Brixner DL; Eichler HG; Goettsch W; Madigan D; Makady A; Schneeweiss S; Tarricone R; Wang SV; Watkins J; Mullins CD
Value Health; 2017 Sep; 20(8):1003-1008. PubMed ID: 28964430
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Improving Transparency to Build Trust in Real-World Secondary Data Studies for Hypothesis Testing-Why, What, and How: Recommendations and a Road Map from the Real-World Evidence Transparency Initiative.
Orsini LS; Berger M; Crown W; Daniel G; Eichler HG; Goettsch W; Graff J; Guerino J; Jonsson P; Lederer NM; Monz B; Mullins CD; Schneeweiss S; Brunt DV; Wang SV; Willke RJ
Value Health; 2020 Sep; 23(9):1128-1136. PubMed ID: 32940229
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Improving transparency to build trust in real-world secondary data studies for hypothesis testing-Why, what, and how: recommendations and a road map from the real-world evidence transparency initiative.
Orsini LS; Monz B; Mullins CD; Van Brunt D; Daniel G; Eichler HG; Graff J; Guerino J; Berger M; Lederer NM; Jonsson P; Schneeweiss S; Wang SV; Crown W; Goettsch W; Willke RJ
Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf; 2020 Nov; 29(11):1504-1513. PubMed ID: 32924243
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. HARmonized Protocol Template to Enhance Reproducibility of Hypothesis Evaluating Real-World Evidence Studies on Treatment Effects: A Good Practices Report of a Joint ISPE/ISPOR Task Force.
Wang SV; Pottegård A; Crown W; Arlett P; Ashcroft DM; Benchimol EI; Berger ML; Crane G; Goettsch W; Hua W; Kabadi S; Kern DM; Kurz X; Langan S; Nonaka T; Orsini L; Perez-Gutthann S; Pinheiro S; Pratt N; Schneeweiss S; Toussi M; Williams RJ
Value Health; 2022 Oct; 25(10):1663-1672. PubMed ID: 36241338
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. HARmonized Protocol Template to Enhance Reproducibility of hypothesis evaluating real-world evidence studies on treatment effects: A good practices report of a joint ISPE/ISPOR task force.
Wang SV; Pottegård A; Crown W; Arlett P; Ashcroft DM; Benchimol EI; Berger ML; Crane G; Goettsch W; Hua W; Kabadi S; Kern DM; Kurz X; Langan S; Nonaka T; Orsini L; Perez-Gutthann S; Pinheiro S; Pratt N; Schneeweiss S; Toussi M; Williams RJ
Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf; 2023 Jan; 32(1):44-55. PubMed ID: 36215113
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The ISPOR Good Practices for Quality Improvement of Cost-Effectiveness Research Task Force Report.
McGhan WF; Al M; Doshi JA; Kamae I; Marx SE; Rindress D
Value Health; 2009; 12(8):1086-99. PubMed ID: 19744291
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Interpreting indirect treatment comparisons and network meta-analysis for health-care decision making: report of the ISPOR Task Force on Indirect Treatment Comparisons Good Research Practices: part 1.
Jansen JP; Fleurence R; Devine B; Itzler R; Barrett A; Hawkins N; Lee K; Boersma C; Annemans L; Cappelleri JC
Value Health; 2011 Jun; 14(4):417-28. PubMed ID: 21669366
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Developing Patient-Centered Real-World Evidence: Emerging Methods Recommendations From a Consensus Process.
Oehrlein EM; Schoch S; Burcu M; McBeth JF; Bright J; Pashos CL; Willke R; Love TR; Mattingly TJ; Perfetto EM;
Value Health; 2023 Jan; 26(1):28-38. PubMed ID: 35863944
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The joint ISPOR-ISPE Special Task Force on real-world evidence in health care decision making: an interview with Marc Berger.
Berger ML
J Comp Eff Res; 2018 Jan; 7(1):11-13. PubMed ID: 29052427
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Conjoint analysis applications in health--a checklist: a report of the ISPOR Good Research Practices for Conjoint Analysis Task Force.
Bridges JF; Hauber AB; Marshall D; Lloyd A; Prosser LA; Regier DA; Johnson FR; Mauskopf J
Value Health; 2011 Jun; 14(4):403-13. PubMed ID: 21669364
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Criteria and Process for Initiating and Developing an ISPOR Good Practices Task Force Report.
Malone DC; Ramsey SD; Patrick DL; Johnson FR; Mullins CD; Roberts MS; Willke RJ; Marshall DA
Value Health; 2020 Apr; 23(4):409-415. PubMed ID: 32327155
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Conducting indirect-treatment-comparison and network-meta-analysis studies: report of the ISPOR Task Force on Indirect Treatment Comparisons Good Research Practices: part 2.
Hoaglin DC; Hawkins N; Jansen JP; Scott DA; Itzler R; Cappelleri JC; Boersma C; Thompson D; Larholt KM; Diaz M; Barrett A
Value Health; 2011 Jun; 14(4):429-37. PubMed ID: 21669367
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Good research practices for comparative effectiveness research: defining, reporting and interpreting nonrandomized studies of treatment effects using secondary data sources: the ISPOR Good Research Practices for Retrospective Database Analysis Task Force Report--Part I.
Berger ML; Mamdani M; Atkins D; Johnson ML
Value Health; 2009; 12(8):1044-52. PubMed ID: 19793072
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Using real-world data for coverage and payment decisions: the ISPOR Real-World Data Task Force report.
Garrison LP; Neumann PJ; Erickson P; Marshall D; Mullins CD
Value Health; 2007; 10(5):326-35. PubMed ID: 17888097
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Real-world evidence to support regulatory decision making: New or expanded medical product indications.
Franklin JM; Liaw KL; Iyasu S; Critchlow CW; Dreyer NA
Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf; 2021 Jun; 30(6):685-693. PubMed ID: 33675248
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Good research practices for comparative effectiveness research: approaches to mitigate bias and confounding in the design of nonrandomized studies of treatment effects using secondary data sources: the International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research Good Research Practices for Retrospective Database Analysis Task Force Report--Part II.
Cox E; Martin BC; Van Staa T; Garbe E; Siebert U; Johnson ML
Value Health; 2009; 12(8):1053-61. PubMed ID: 19744292
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Consolidated Health Economic Evaluation Reporting Standards (CHEERS)--explanation and elaboration: a report of the ISPOR Health Economic Evaluation Publication Guidelines Good Reporting Practices Task Force.
Husereau D; Drummond M; Petrou S; Carswell C; Moher D; Greenberg D; Augustovski F; Briggs AH; Mauskopf J; Loder E;
Value Health; 2013; 16(2):231-50. PubMed ID: 23538175
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Trial designs using real-world data: The changing landscape of the regulatory approval process.
Baumfeld Andre E; Reynolds R; Caubel P; Azoulay L; Dreyer NA
Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf; 2020 Oct; 29(10):1201-1212. PubMed ID: 31823482
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Good research practices for cost-effectiveness analysis alongside clinical trials: the ISPOR RCT-CEA Task Force report.
Ramsey S; Willke R; Briggs A; Brown R; Buxton M; Chawla A; Cook J; Glick H; Liljas B; Petitti D; Reed S
Value Health; 2005; 8(5):521-33. PubMed ID: 16176491
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
