1458 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28914229)
1. Clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of beta-interferon and glatiramer acetate for treating multiple sclerosis: systematic review and economic evaluation.
Melendez-Torres GJ; Auguste P; Armoiry X; Maheswaran H; Court R; Madan J; Kan A; Lin S; Counsell C; Patterson J; Rodrigues J; Ciccarelli O; Fraser H; Clarke A
Health Technol Assess; 2017 Sep; 21(52):1-352. PubMed ID: 28914229
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Cost-utility of First-line Disease-modifying Treatments for Relapsing-Remitting Multiple Sclerosis.
Soini E; Joutseno J; Sumelahti ML
Clin Ther; 2017 Mar; 39(3):537-557.e10. PubMed ID: 28209373
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of donepezil, galantamine, rivastigmine and memantine for the treatment of Alzheimer's disease (review of Technology Appraisal No. 111): a systematic review and economic model.
Bond M; Rogers G; Peters J; Anderson R; Hoyle M; Miners A; Moxham T; Davis S; Thokala P; Wailoo A; Jeffreys M; Hyde C
Health Technol Assess; 2012; 16(21):1-470. PubMed ID: 22541366
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Cost-effectiveness analyses of natalizumab (Tysabri) compared with other disease-modifying therapies for people with highly active relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis in the UK.
Gani R; Giovannoni G; Bates D; Kemball B; Hughes S; Kerrigan J
Pharmacoeconomics; 2008; 26(7):617-27. PubMed ID: 18563952
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparative effectiveness of beta-interferons and glatiramer acetate for relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis: systematic review and network meta-analysis of trials including recommended dosages.
Melendez-Torres GJ; Armoiry X; Court R; Patterson J; Kan A; Auguste P; Madan J; Counsell C; Ciccarelli O; Clarke A
BMC Neurol; 2018 Oct; 18(1):162. PubMed ID: 30285675
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Interferons-beta versus glatiramer acetate for relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis.
La Mantia L; Di Pietrantonj C; Rovaris M; Rigon G; Frau S; Berardo F; Gandini A; Longobardi A; Weinstock-Guttman B; Vaona A
Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2016 Nov; 11(11):CD009333. PubMed ID: 27880972
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Cost-Effectiveness of Peginterferon Beta-1a and Alemtuzumab in Relapsing-Remitting Multiple Sclerosis.
Dashputre AA; Kamal KM; Pawar G
J Manag Care Spec Pharm; 2017 Jun; 23(6):666-676. PubMed ID: 28530523
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of interferon beta and glatiramer acetate in the UK Multiple Sclerosis Risk Sharing Scheme at 6 years: a clinical cohort study with natural history comparator.
Palace J; Duddy M; Bregenzer T; Lawton M; Zhu F; Boggild M; Piske B; Robertson NP; Oger J; Tremlett H; Tilling K; Ben-Shlomo Y; Dobson C
Lancet Neurol; 2015 May; 14(5):497-505. PubMed ID: 25841667
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Interferons-beta versus glatiramer acetate for relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis.
La Mantia L; Di Pietrantonj C; Rovaris M; Rigon G; Frau S; Berardo F; Gandini A; Longobardi A; Weinstock-Guttman B; Vaona A
Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2014 Jul; (7):CD009333. PubMed ID: 25062935
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Everolimus, lutetium-177 DOTATATE and sunitinib for advanced, unresectable or metastatic neuroendocrine tumours with disease progression: a systematic review and cost-effectiveness analysis.
Mujica-Mota R; Varley-Campbell J; Tikhonova I; Cooper C; Griffin E; Haasova M; Peters J; Lucherini S; Talens-Bou J; Long L; Sherriff D; Napier M; Ramage J; Hoyle M
Health Technol Assess; 2018 Sep; 22(49):1-326. PubMed ID: 30209002
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Cost-effectiveness analysis of peginterferon beta-1a compared with interferon beta-1a and glatiramer acetate in the treatment of relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis in the United States.
Hernandez L; Guo S; Kinter E; Fay M
J Med Econ; 2016 Jul; 19(7):684-95. PubMed ID: 26947984
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of cetuximab (review of technology appraisal no. 176) and panitumumab (partial review of technology appraisal no. 240) for previously untreated metastatic colorectal cancer: a systematic review and economic evaluation.
Huxley N; Crathorne L; Varley-Campbell J; Tikhonova I; Snowsill T; Briscoe S; Peters J; Bond M; Napier M; Hoyle M
Health Technol Assess; 2017 Jun; 21(38):1-294. PubMed ID: 28682222
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparing the cost-effectiveness of disease-modifying drugs for the first-line treatment of relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis.
Goldberg LD; Edwards NC; Fincher C; Doan QV; Al-Sabbagh A; Meletiche DM
J Manag Care Pharm; 2009 Sep; 15(7):543-55. PubMed ID: 19739877
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Ocrelizumab for Treating Patients with Primary Progressive Multiple Sclerosis: An Evidence Review Group Perspective of a NICE Single Technology Appraisal.
Auguste P; Colquitt J; Connock M; Loveman E; Court R; Ciccarelli O; Counsell C; Armoiry X
Pharmacoeconomics; 2020 Jun; 38(6):527-536. PubMed ID: 32048205
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Immunomodulators and immunosuppressants for multiple sclerosis: a network meta-analysis.
Filippini G; Del Giovane C; Vacchi L; D'Amico R; Di Pietrantonj C; Beecher D; Salanti G
Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2013 Jun; (6):CD008933. PubMed ID: 23744561
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Total hip replacement and surface replacement for the treatment of pain and disability resulting from end-stage arthritis of the hip (review of technology appraisal guidance 2 and 44): systematic review and economic evaluation.
Clarke A; Pulikottil-Jacob R; Grove A; Freeman K; Mistry H; Tsertsvadze A; Connock M; Court R; Kandala NB; Costa M; Suri G; Metcalfe D; Crowther M; Morrow S; Johnson S; Sutcliffe P
Health Technol Assess; 2015 Jan; 19(10):1-668, vii-viii. PubMed ID: 25634033
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Disease-Modifying Therapies for Relapsing-Remitting and Primary Progressive Multiple Sclerosis: A Cost-Utility Analysis.
Zimmermann M; Brouwer E; Tice JA; Seidner M; Loos AM; Liu S; Chapman RH; Kumar V; Carlson JJ
CNS Drugs; 2018 Dec; 32(12):1145-1157. PubMed ID: 30141001
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Ponatinib for Treating Acute Lymphoblastic Leukaemia: An Evidence Review Group Perspective of a NICE Single Technology Appraisal.
Stevenson M; Pandor A; Hamilton J; Stevens J; Rowntree C; Martyn-St James M; Rawdin A; Wong R
Pharmacoeconomics; 2018 Jul; 36(7):759-768. PubMed ID: 29502175
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of second- and third-generation left ventricular assist devices as either bridge to transplant or alternative to transplant for adults eligible for heart transplantation: systematic review and cost-effectiveness model.
Sutcliffe P; Connock M; Pulikottil-Jacob R; Kandala NB; Suri G; Gurung T; Grove A; Shyangdan D; Briscoe S; Maheswaran H; Clarke A
Health Technol Assess; 2013 Nov; 17(53):1-499, v-vi. PubMed ID: 24280231
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Testing strategies for Lynch syndrome in people with endometrial cancer: systematic reviews and economic evaluation.
Stinton C; Jordan M; Fraser H; Auguste P; Court R; Al-Khudairy L; Madan J; Grammatopoulos D; Taylor-Phillips S
Health Technol Assess; 2021 Jun; 25(42):1-216. PubMed ID: 34169821
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
