529 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28914250)
1. A comparative evaluation of retention of pit and fissure sealant bonded using sixth-, seventh-, and eighth-generation adhesives: An
Nirwan M; Nigam AG; Marwah N; Nayak UA; Bansal A; Gahlot MS
J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent; 2017; 35(4):359-366. PubMed ID: 28914250
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Effectiveness of pit and fissure sealants bonded with different adhesive systems: a prospective randomized controlled trial.
Erbas Unverdi G; Atac SA; Cehreli ZC
Clin Oral Investig; 2017 Sep; 21(7):2235-2243. PubMed ID: 27900529
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. [Clinical effect of pit and fissure sealant used in combination with self-etching adhesive on permanent teeth].
Peng SM; Zhao W; Lin JC; Ling JQ
Shanghai Kou Qiang Yi Xue; 2006 Dec; 15(6):571-4. PubMed ID: 17533704
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Retention of three fissure sealants and a dentin bonding system used as fissure sealant in caries prevention: 12-month follow-up results.
Baca P; Bravo M; Baca AP; Jiménez A; González-Rodríguez MP
Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal; 2007 Oct; 12(6):E459-63. PubMed ID: 17909514
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparison and Clinical Evaluation of Two Pit and Fissure Sealants on Permanent Mandibular First Molars: An
Smitha M; Paul ST; Nagaraj T; Khan AR; Rinu K
J Contemp Dent Pract; 2019 Oct; 20(10):1151-1158. PubMed ID: 31883249
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A 48-month clinical evaluation of fissure sealants placed with different adhesive systems.
Karaman E; Yazici AR; Tuncer D; Firat E; Unluer S; Baseren M
Oper Dent; 2013; 38(4):369-75. PubMed ID: 23210859
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Effectiveness of fissure sealants on initial caries lesions (ICDAS 1-3) of permanent molars: A 4-year follow-up.
Berdouses ED; Michalaki M; Tsinidou K; Vlachou A; Pantazis N; Oulis CJ
Eur J Paediatr Dent; 2021 Sep; 22(3):180-188. PubMed ID: 34544245
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Clinical evaluation of a nanofilled fissure sealant placed with different adhesive systems: 24-month results.
Yazici AR; Karaman E; Baseren M; Tuncer D; Yazici E; Unlüer S
Oper Dent; 2009; 34(6):642-7. PubMed ID: 19953772
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Retention and remineralization effect of moisture tolerant resin-based sealant and glass ionomer sealant on non-cavitated pit and fissure caries: Randomized controlled clinical trial.
Alsabek L; Al-Nerabieah Z; Bshara N; Comisi JC
J Dent; 2019 Jul; 86():69-74. PubMed ID: 31136817
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Pit and fissure sealant: review of the literature.
Simonsen RJ
Pediatr Dent; 2002; 24(5):393-414. PubMed ID: 12412954
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A 2-year clinical evaluation of two pit and fissure sealants placed with and without the use of a bonding agent.
Boksman L; McConnell RJ; Carson B; McCutcheon-Jones EF
Quintessence Int; 1993 Feb; 24(2):131-3. PubMed ID: 8511264
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Effectiveness of primer and bond in sealant retention and caries prevention.
Mascarenhas AK; Nazar H; Al-Mutawaa S; Soparkar P
Pediatr Dent; 2008; 30(1):25-8. PubMed ID: 18402095
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Retention and effectiveness of pit and fissure sealants placed with or without bonding agent in young permanent teeth: A randomized clinical trial with a year follow-up.
Bandi M; Mallineni SK; Nuvvula S
Indian J Dent Res; 2020; 31(6):877-882. PubMed ID: 33753657
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A randomised clinical trial on the use of intermediate bonding on the retention of fissure sealants in children.
McCafferty J; O'Connell AC
Int J Paediatr Dent; 2016 Mar; 26(2):110-5. PubMed ID: 25864681
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Clinical comparison of a flowable composite and fissure sealant: a 24-month split-mouth, randomized, and controlled study.
Erdemir U; Sancakli HS; Yaman BC; Ozel S; Yucel T; Yıldız E
J Dent; 2014 Feb; 42(2):149-57. PubMed ID: 24296163
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A comparative study of clinical effectiveness of fissure sealing with and without bonding systems: 3-year results.
Sakkas C; Khomenko L; Trachuk I
Eur Arch Paediatr Dent; 2013 Apr; 14(2):73-81. PubMed ID: 23549995
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Effectiveness of a pit and fissure sealant in the prevention of caries: three-year clinical results.
McCune RJ; Bojanini J; Abodeely RA
J Am Dent Assoc; 1979 Oct; 99(4):619-23. PubMed ID: 389988
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Retention of pit and fissure sealant versus flowable composite: An
Singh C; Kaur K; Kapoor K
J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent; 2019; 37(4):372-377. PubMed ID: 31710012
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Pit and fissure sealants for preventing dental decay in the permanent teeth of children and adolescents.
Ahovuo-Saloranta A; Hiiri A; Nordblad A; Mäkelä M; Worthington HV
Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2008 Oct; (4):CD001830. PubMed ID: 18843625
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Clinical Follow-up of a Fissure Sealant Placed Using Different Adhesive Protocols: A 24-month Split-mouth Study.
Yazici AR; Bayazit EO; Kutuk ZB; Ozgunaltay G; Ergin E; Berber A
Oper Dent; 2018; 43(4):362-371. PubMed ID: 29630489
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]