These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

131 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28914767)

  • 1. Feasibility of Equivalent Dipole Models for Electroencephalogram-Based Brain Computer Interfaces.
    Schimpf PH
    Brain Sci; 2017 Sep; 7(9):. PubMed ID: 28914767
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparison of performance of spherical and realistic head models in dipole localization from noisy EEG.
    Vanrumste B; Van Hoey G; Van de Walle R; D'Havé MR; Lemahieu IA; Boon PA
    Med Eng Phys; 2002 Jul; 24(6):403-18. PubMed ID: 12135649
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Effects of dipole position, orientation and noise on the accuracy of EEG source localization.
    Whittingstall K; Stroink G; Gates L; Connolly JF; Finley A
    Biomed Eng Online; 2003 Jun; 2():14. PubMed ID: 12807534
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The influence of electrode location errors on EEG dipole source localization with a realistic head model.
    Wang Y; Gotman J
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2001 Sep; 112(9):1777-80. PubMed ID: 11514261
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Applicability of the single equivalent point dipole model to represent a spatially distributed bio-electrical source.
    Armoundas AA; Feldman AB; Sherman DA; Cohen RJ
    Med Biol Eng Comput; 2001 Sep; 39(5):562-70. PubMed ID: 11712653
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. EEG dipole source localization using artificial neural networks.
    Van Hoey G; De Clercq J; Vanrumste B; Van De Walle R; Lemahieu I; D'Havé M; Boon P
    Phys Med Biol; 2000 Apr; 45(4):997-1011. PubMed ID: 10795987
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Conventional and reciprocal approaches to the inverse dipole localization problem of electroencephalography.
    Finke S; Gulrajani RM; Gotman J
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2003 Jun; 50(6):657-66. PubMed ID: 12814232
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Influence of skull conductivity perturbations on EEG dipole source analysis.
    Chen F; Hallez H; Staelens S
    Med Phys; 2010 Aug; 37(8):4475-84. PubMed ID: 20879606
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Experimental tests of EEG source localization accuracy in spherical head models.
    Cuffin BN; Schomer DL; Ives JR; Blume H
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2001 Jan; 112(1):46-51. PubMed ID: 11137660
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Trends in EEG source localization.
    Koles ZJ
    Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol; 1998 Feb; 106(2):127-37. PubMed ID: 9741773
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Dipole estimation errors due to differences in modeling anisotropic conductivities in realistic head models for EEG source analysis.
    Hallez H; Vanrumste B; Van Hese P; Delputte S; Lemahieu I
    Phys Med Biol; 2008 Apr; 53(7):1877-94. PubMed ID: 18364544
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. EEG source localization and imaging using multiple signal classification approaches.
    Mosher JC; Baillet S; Leahy RM
    J Clin Neurophysiol; 1999 May; 16(3):225-38. PubMed ID: 10426406
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Low resolution brain electromagnetic tomography in a realistic geometry head model: a simulation study.
    Ding L; Lai Y; He B
    Phys Med Biol; 2005 Jan; 50(1):45-56. PubMed ID: 15715421
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Brain source localization: a new method based on MUltiple SIgnal Classification algorithm and spatial sparsity of the field signal for electroencephalogram measurements.
    Vergallo P; Lay-Ekuakille A
    Rev Sci Instrum; 2013 Aug; 84(8):085117. PubMed ID: 24007117
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Estimation of number of independent brain electric sources from the scalp EEGs.
    Bai X; He B
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2006 Oct; 53(10):1883-92. PubMed ID: 17019851
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Influence of head models on neuromagnetic fields and inverse source localizations.
    Ramon C; Haueisen J; Schimpf PH
    Biomed Eng Online; 2006 Oct; 5():55. PubMed ID: 17059601
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Influence of head models on EEG simulations and inverse source localizations.
    Ramon C; Schimpf PH; Haueisen J
    Biomed Eng Online; 2006 Feb; 5():10. PubMed ID: 16466570
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Localization of realistic cortical activity in MEG using current multipoles.
    Jerbi K; Baillet S; Mosher JC; Nolte G; Garnero L; Leahy RM
    Neuroimage; 2004 Jun; 22(2):779-93. PubMed ID: 15193607
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Linear inverse solutions: simulations from a realistic head model in MEG.
    Soufflet L; Boeijinga PH
    Brain Topogr; 2005; 18(2):87-99. PubMed ID: 16341577
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The nature and distribution of errors in sound localization by human listeners.
    Carlile S; Leong P; Hyams S
    Hear Res; 1997 Dec; 114(1-2):179-96. PubMed ID: 9447931
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.