292 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28914967)
1. The chemotherapy response score is a useful histological predictor of prognosis in high-grade serous carcinoma.
Singh P; Kaushal V; Rai B; Rajwanshi A; Gupta N; Dey P; Garg R; Rohilla M; Suri V; Ghoshal S; Srinivasan R
Histopathology; 2018 Mar; 72(4):619-625. PubMed ID: 28914967
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Chemotherapy Response Score: Development and Validation of a System to Quantify Histopathologic Response to Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Tubo-Ovarian High-Grade Serous Carcinoma.
Böhm S; Faruqi A; Said I; Lockley M; Brockbank E; Jeyarajah A; Fitzpatrick A; Ennis D; Dowe T; Santos JL; Cook LS; Tinker AV; Le ND; Gilks CB; Singh N
J Clin Oncol; 2015 Aug; 33(22):2457-63. PubMed ID: 26124480
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. External validation of chemotherapy response score system for histopathological assessment of tumor regression after neoadjuvant chemotherapy in tubo-ovarian high-grade serous carcinoma.
Lee JY; Chung YS; Na K; Kim HM; Park CK; Nam EJ; Kim S; Kim SW; Kim YT; Kim HS
J Gynecol Oncol; 2017 Nov; 28(6):e73. PubMed ID: 28758379
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A 3-Tier Chemotherapy Response Score for Ovarian/Fallopian Tube/Peritoneal High-grade Serous Carcinoma: Is it Clinically Relevant?
Lawson BC; Euscher ED; Bassett RL; Liu J; Ramalingam P; Zhong Y; Fleming ND; Malpica A
Am J Surg Pathol; 2020 Feb; 44(2):206-213. PubMed ID: 31651523
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Upfront debulking surgery versus interval debulking surgery for advanced tubo-ovarian high-grade serous carcinoma and diffuse peritoneal metastases treated with peritonectomy procedures plus HIPEC.
Biacchi D; Accarpio F; Ansaloni L; Macrì A; Ciardi A; Federici O; Spagnoli A; Cavaliere D; Vaira M; Sapienza P; Sammartino P
J Surg Oncol; 2019 Dec; 120(7):1208-1219. PubMed ID: 31531879
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Prognostic implications of histological tumor regression (Böhm's score) in patients receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy for high grade serous tubal & ovarian carcinoma.
Rajkumar S; Polson A; Nath R; Lane G; Sayasneh A; Jakes A; Begum S; Mehra G
Gynecol Oncol; 2018 Nov; 151(2):264-268. PubMed ID: 30197060
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. TP53 variant allele frequency correlates with the chemotherapy response score in ovarian/fallopian tube/peritoneal high-grade serous carcinoma.
Lawson BC; Yang RK; Euscher ED; Ramalingam P; Malpica A
Hum Pathol; 2021 Sep; 115():76-83. PubMed ID: 34153306
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Prognostic Role of Histological Tumor Regression in Patients Receiving Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy for High-Grade Serous Tubo-ovarian Carcinoma.
Coghlan E; Meniawy TM; Munro A; Bulsara M; Stewart CJ; Tan A; Koay MHE; MaGee D; Codde J; Tan J; Salfinger SG; Mohan GR; Leung Y; Nichols CB; Cohen PA
Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2017 May; 27(4):708-713. PubMed ID: 28441251
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Assessment of a Chemotherapy Response Score (CRS) System for Tubo-Ovarian High-Grade Serous Carcinoma (HGSC).
Ditzel HM; Strickland KC; Meserve EE; Stover E; Konstantinopoulos PA; Matulonis UA; Muto MG; Liu JF; Feltmate C; Horowitz N; Berkowitz RS; Gupta M; Hecht JL; Lin DI; Jochumsen KM; Welch WR; Hirsch MS; Quade BJ; Lee KR; Crum CP; Mutter GL; Nucci MR; Howitt BE
Int J Gynecol Pathol; 2019 May; 38(3):230-240. PubMed ID: 29750700
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Prognostic value of HE4 in advanced-stage, high-grade serous ovarian cancer: Analysis of HE4 kinetics during NACT, predicting surgical outcome and recurrence in comparison to CA125.
AlSomairi A; Himayda S; Altelmesani A; Lee YJ; Lee JY
Gynecol Oncol; 2024 Feb; 181():155-161. PubMed ID: 38176127
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. External validation of a 'response score' after neoadjuvant chemotherapy in patients with high-grade serous ovarian carcinoma with complete clinical response.
Zorzato PC; Zannoni GF; Tudisco R; Pasciuto T; Di Giorgio A; Franchi M; Scambia G; Fagotti A
Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2020 Jan; 30(1):67-73. PubMed ID: 31754067
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Chemotherapy-associated foam cell aggregates as a prognostic factor in patients with pelvic high-grade serous carcinoma receiving neo-adjuvant chemotherapy.
Kojima N; Kuno I; Ushigusa T; Kato T; Yoshida H
Virchows Arch; 2020 Sep; 477(3):429-436. PubMed ID: 32103350
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Prognostic Value of Pathologic Chemotherapy Response Score in Patients With Ovarian Cancer After Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy.
Michaan N; Chong WY; Han NY; Lim MC; Park SY
Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2018 Nov; 28(9):1676-1682. PubMed ID: 30256239
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The role of neoadjuvant chemotherapy in the management of low-grade serous carcinoma of the ovary and peritoneum: Further evidence of relative chemoresistance.
Cobb LP; Sun CC; Iyer R; Nick AM; Fleming ND; Westin SN; Sood AK; Wong KK; Silva EG; Gershenson DM
Gynecol Oncol; 2020 Sep; 158(3):653-658. PubMed ID: 32709538
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Prognostic Benefit of ≥6 Cycles of Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy for Advanced Ovarian, Tubal, and Peritoneal Cancers.
Kondo E; Nimura R; Maki S; Kaneda M; Nii M; Yoshida K; Tabata T; Ikeda T
Anticancer Res; 2021 Aug; 41(8):4157-4161. PubMed ID: 34281887
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparison of treatment invasiveness between upfront debulking surgery versus interval debulking surgery following neoadjuvant chemotherapy for stage III/IV ovarian, tubal, and peritoneal cancers in a phase III randomised trial: Japan Clinical Oncology Group Study JCOG0602.
Onda T; Satoh T; Saito T; Kasamatsu T; Nakanishi T; Nakamura K; Wakabayashi M; Takehara K; Saito M; Ushijima K; Kobayashi H; Kawana K; Yokota H; Takano M; Takeshima N; Watanabe Y; Yaegashi N; Konishi I; Kamura T; Yoshikawa H;
Eur J Cancer; 2016 Sep; 64():22-31. PubMed ID: 27323348
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. An analysis of patients with bulky advanced stage ovarian, tubal, and peritoneal carcinoma treated with primary debulking surgery (PDS) during an identical time period as the randomized EORTC-NCIC trial of PDS vs neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT).
Chi DS; Musa F; Dao F; Zivanovic O; Sonoda Y; Leitao MM; Levine DA; Gardner GJ; Abu-Rustum NR; Barakat RR
Gynecol Oncol; 2012 Jan; 124(1):10-4. PubMed ID: 21917306
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Pathological chemotherapy response score is prognostic in tubo-ovarian high-grade serous carcinoma: A systematic review and meta-analysis of individual patient data.
Cohen PA; Powell A; Böhm S; Gilks CB; Stewart CJR; Meniawy TM; Bulsara M; Avril S; Brockbank EC; Bosse T; de Azevedo Focchi GR; Ganesan R; Glasspool RM; Howitt BE; Kim HS; Lee JY; Le ND; Lockley M; Manchanda R; Mandalia T; McCluggage WG; McNeish I; Midha D; Srinivasan R; Tan YY; van der Griend R; Yunokawa M; Zannoni GF; ; Singh N
Gynecol Oncol; 2019 Aug; 154(2):441-448. PubMed ID: 31118141
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Immunotyping in tubo-ovarian high-grade serous carcinoma by PD-L1 and CD8+ T-lymphocytes predicts disease-free survival.
Bansal A; Srinivasan R; Rohilla M; Rai B; Rajwanshi A; Suri V; Chandra Saha S
APMIS; 2021 May; 129(5):254-264. PubMed ID: 33455015
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparison of survival between primary debulking surgery and neoadjuvant chemotherapy for stage III/IV ovarian, tubal and peritoneal cancers in phase III randomised trial.
Onda T; Satoh T; Ogawa G; Saito T; Kasamatsu T; Nakanishi T; Mizutani T; Takehara K; Okamoto A; Ushijima K; Kobayashi H; Kawana K; Yokota H; Takano M; Kanao H; Watanabe Y; Yamamoto K; Yaegashi N; Kamura T; Yoshikawa H;
Eur J Cancer; 2020 May; 130():114-125. PubMed ID: 32179446
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
