These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

119 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28915780)

  • 1. Cognitive Load Reduces Perceived Linguistic Convergence Between Dyads.
    Abel J; Babel M
    Lang Speech; 2017 Sep; 60(3):479-502. PubMed ID: 28915780
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Effects of age on speech and voice quality ratings.
    Goy H; Kathleen Pichora-Fuller M; van Lieshout P
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2016 Apr; 139(4):1648. PubMed ID: 27106312
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. On phonetic convergence during conversational interaction.
    Pardo JS
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2006 Apr; 119(4):2382-93. PubMed ID: 16642851
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Can older adults enhance the intelligibility of their speech?
    Smiljanic R
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 Feb; 133(2):EL129-35. PubMed ID: 23363193
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Effects of cognitive workload on speech production: acoustic analyses and perceptual consequences.
    Lively SE; Pisoni DB; Van Summers W; Bernacki RH
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1993 May; 93(5):2962-73. PubMed ID: 8315159
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Linguistic initiation signals increase auditory feedback error correction.
    Alsius A; Mitsuya T; Latif N; Munhall KG
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2017 Aug; 142(2):838. PubMed ID: 28863596
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The effect of visual feedback and training in auditory-perceptual judgment of voice quality.
    Barsties B; Beers M; Ten Cate L; Van Ballegooijen K; Braam L; De Groot M; Van Der Kant M; Kruitwagen C; Maryn Y
    Logoped Phoniatr Vocol; 2017 Apr; 42(1):1-8. PubMed ID: 26525078
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Toward improved ecological validity in the acoustic measurement of overall voice quality: combining continuous speech and sustained vowels.
    Maryn Y; Corthals P; Van Cauwenberge P; Roy N; De Bodt M
    J Voice; 2010 Sep; 24(5):540-55. PubMed ID: 19883993
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Conversational role influences speech imitation.
    Pardo JS; Jay IC; Krauss RM
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2010 Nov; 72(8):2254-64. PubMed ID: 21097867
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Production and perception of speech intonation in pediatric cochlear implant recipients and individuals with normal hearing.
    Peng SC; Tomblin JB; Turner CW
    Ear Hear; 2008 Jun; 29(3):336-51. PubMed ID: 18344873
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The effect of levels and types of experience on judgment of synthesized voice quality.
    Sofranko JL; Prosek RA
    J Voice; 2014 Jan; 28(1):24-35. PubMed ID: 24119637
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The Role of Predictability in Intonational Variability.
    Turnbull R
    Lang Speech; 2017 Mar; 60(1):123-153. PubMed ID: 28326986
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Perceptual susceptibility to acoustic manipulations in speaker discrimination.
    Sell G; Suied C; Elhilali M; Shamma S
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2015 Feb; 137(2):911-22. PubMed ID: 25698023
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The Montclair Map Task: Balance, Efficacy, and Efficiency in Conversational Interaction.
    Pardo JS; Urmanche A; Gash H; Wiener J; Mason N; Wilman S; Francis K; Decker A
    Lang Speech; 2019 Jun; 62(2):378-398. PubMed ID: 29857788
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Converging to the baseline: Corpus evidence for convergence in speech rate to interlocutor's baseline.
    Cohen Priva U; Edelist L; Gleason E
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2017 May; 141(5):2989. PubMed ID: 28599520
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Cognitive load during speech perception in noise: the influence of age, hearing loss, and cognition on the pupil response.
    Zekveld AA; Kramer SE; Festen JM
    Ear Hear; 2011; 32(4):498-510. PubMed ID: 21233711
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The Exploration of an Objective Model for Roughness With Several Acoustic Markers.
    Latoszek BBV; De Bodt M; Gerrits E; Maryn Y
    J Voice; 2018 Mar; 32(2):149-161. PubMed ID: 28572016
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Pre- and posttreatment voice and speech outcomes in patients with advanced head and neck cancer treated with chemoradiotherapy: expert listeners' and patient's perception.
    van der Molen L; van Rossum MA; Jacobi I; van Son RJ; Smeele LE; Rasch CR; Hilgers FJ
    J Voice; 2012 Sep; 26(5):664.e25-33. PubMed ID: 22209059
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Top-down mechanisms in dysphonia perception: the need for blind tests.
    Ghio A; Révis J; Merienne S; Giovanni A
    J Voice; 2013 Jul; 27(4):481-5. PubMed ID: 23809570
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The Effect of Experience on Response Time When Judging Synthesized Voice Quality.
    Kisenwether JS; Prosek RA
    J Voice; 2016 Jul; 30(4):394-7. PubMed ID: 26474719
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.