These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

154 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28915783)

  • 1. Prediction of Agreement and Phonetic Overlap Shape Sublexical Identification.
    Martin AE; Monahan PJ; Samuel AG
    Lang Speech; 2017 Sep; 60(3):356-376. PubMed ID: 28915783
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The Effects of Language Experience and Speech Context on the Phonetic Accommodation of English-accented Spanish Voicing.
    Llanos F; Francis AL
    Lang Speech; 2017 Mar; 60(1):3-26. PubMed ID: 28326991
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Assessing the perceptual contributions of vowels and consonants to Mandarin sentence intelligibility.
    Chen F; Wong LL; Wong EY
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 Aug; 134(2):EL178-84. PubMed ID: 23927222
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The role of segmental and durational cues in the processing of reduced words.
    van de Ven M; Ernestus M
    Lang Speech; 2018 Sep; 61(3):358-383. PubMed ID: 28870139
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Attentional modulation of the phonetic significance of acoustic cues.
    Gordon PC; Eberhardt JL; Rueckl JG
    Cogn Psychol; 1993 Jan; 25(1):1-42. PubMed ID: 8425384
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Lexical Segmentation in Artificial Word Learning: The Effects of Converging Sublexical Cues.
    Bagou O; Frauenfelder UH
    Lang Speech; 2018 Mar; 61(1):3-30. PubMed ID: 29280405
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Perception of contrastive bi-syllabic lexical stress in unaccented and accented words by younger and older listeners.
    Gordon-Salant S; Yeni-Komshian GH; Pickett EJ; Fitzgibbons PJ
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2016 Mar; 139(3):1132-48. PubMed ID: 27036250
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Sentential, lexical, and acoustic effects on the perception of word boundaries.
    Mattys SL; Melhorn JF
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2007 Jul; 122(1):554-67. PubMed ID: 17614511
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Processing Relationships Between Language-Being-Spoken and Other Speech Dimensions in Monolingual and Bilingual Listeners.
    Vaughn CR; Bradlow AR
    Lang Speech; 2017 Dec; 60(4):530-561. PubMed ID: 29216813
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Sentence intelligibility during segmental interruption and masking by speech-modulated noise: Effects of age and hearing loss.
    Fogerty D; Ahlstrom JB; Bologna WJ; Dubno JR
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2015 Jun; 137(6):3487-501. PubMed ID: 26093436
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Perceptual learning of phonetic information that indicates morphological structure.
    Barden K; Hawkins S
    Phonetica; 2013; 70(4):323-42. PubMed ID: 24514161
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The Effect of Residual Acoustic Hearing and Adaptation to Uncertainty on Speech Perception in Cochlear Implant Users: Evidence From Eye-Tracking.
    McMurray B; Farris-Trimble A; Seedorff M; Rigler H
    Ear Hear; 2016; 37(1):e37-51. PubMed ID: 26317298
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The Role of Fundamental Frequency and Temporal Envelope in Processing Sentences with Temporary Syntactic Ambiguities.
    Sharpe V; Fogerty D; den Ouden DB
    Lang Speech; 2017 Sep; 60(3):399-426. PubMed ID: 28915784
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Which epenthetic vowel? Phonetic categories versus acoustic detail in perceptual vowel epenthesis.
    Guevara-Rukoz A; Lin I; Morii M; Minagawa Y; Dupoux E; Peperkamp S
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2017 Aug; 142(2):EL211. PubMed ID: 28863560
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Effect of speaking rate on the perceptual structure of a phonetic category.
    Miller JL; Volaitis LE
    Percept Psychophys; 1989 Dec; 46(6):505-12. PubMed ID: 2587179
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The influence of visual speech information on the intelligibility of English consonants produced by non-native speakers.
    Kawase S; Hannah B; Wang Y
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2014 Sep; 136(3):1352. PubMed ID: 25190408
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The effects of lexical neighbors on stop consonant articulation.
    Goldrick M; Vaughn C; Murphy A
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 Aug; 134(2):EL172-7. PubMed ID: 23927221
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Effects of contextual cues on speech recognition in simulated electric-acoustic stimulation.
    Kong YY; Donaldson G; Somarowthu A
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2015 May; 137(5):2846-57. PubMed ID: 25994712
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Effects of age on speech and voice quality ratings.
    Goy H; Kathleen Pichora-Fuller M; van Lieshout P
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2016 Apr; 139(4):1648. PubMed ID: 27106312
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Effects of phonetically-cued talker variation on semantic encoding.
    Sumner M; Kataoka R
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 Dec; 134(6):EL485. PubMed ID: 25669293
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.