These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

131 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28916490)

  • 1. Decision making about healthcare-related tests and diagnostic test strategies. Paper 3: a systematic review shows limitations in most tools designed to assess quality and develop recommendations.
    Mustafa RA; Wiercioch W; Falavigna M; Zhang Y; Ivanova L; Arevalo-Rodriguez I; Cheung A; Prediger B; Ventresca M; Brozek J; Santesso N; Bossuyt P; Garg AX; Lloyd N; Lelgemann M; Bühler D; Schünemann HJ
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2017 Dec; 92():29-37. PubMed ID: 28916490
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Decision making about healthcare-related tests and diagnostic test strategies. Paper 4: International guidelines show variability in their approaches.
    Mustafa RA; Wiercioch W; Arevalo-Rodriguez I; Cheung A; Prediger B; Ivanova L; Ventresca M; Brozek J; Santesso N; Bossuyt P; Garg AX; Lloyd N; Lelgemann M; Bühler D; Schünemann HJ
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2017 Dec; 92():38-46. PubMed ID: 28917630
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Decision making about healthcare-related tests and diagnostic test strategies. Paper 5: a qualitative study with experts suggests that test accuracy data alone is rarely sufficient for decision making.
    Mustafa RA; Wiercioch W; Ventresca M; Brozek J; Schünemann HJ;
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2017 Dec; 92():47-57. PubMed ID: 28917629
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Decision making about healthcare-related tests and diagnostic test strategies. Paper 2: a review of methodological and practical challenges.
    Mustafa RA; Wiercioch W; Cheung A; Prediger B; Brozek J; Bossuyt P; Garg AX; Lelgemann M; Büehler D; Schünemann HJ
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2017 Dec; 92():18-28. PubMed ID: 28916488
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Strength of Recommendation and Quality of Evidence for Recommendations in Current Infectious Diseases Society of America Guidelines.
    Miles KE; Rodriguez R; Gross AE; Kalil AC
    Open Forum Infect Dis; 2021 Feb; 8(2):ofab033. PubMed ID: 33614818
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Grading quality of evidence and strength of recommendations in clinical practice guidelines: Part 2 of 3. The GRADE approach to grading quality of evidence about diagnostic tests and strategies.
    Brozek JL; Akl EA; Jaeschke R; Lang DM; Bossuyt P; Glasziou P; Helfand M; Ueffing E; Alonso-Coello P; Meerpohl J; Phillips B; Horvath AR; Bousquet J; Guyatt GH; Schünemann HJ;
    Allergy; 2009 Aug; 64(8):1109-16. PubMed ID: 19489757
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Rating the strength of scientific evidence: relevance for quality improvement programs.
    Lohr KN
    Int J Qual Health Care; 2004 Feb; 16(1):9-18. PubMed ID: 15020556
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The effectiveness of tools used to evaluate successful critical decision making skills for applicants to healthcare graduate educational programs: a systematic review.
    Benham B; Hawley D
    JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep; 2015 May; 13(4):231-75. PubMed ID: 26447081
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The methodological quality assessment tools for preclinical and clinical studies, systematic review and meta-analysis, and clinical practice guideline: a systematic review.
    Zeng X; Zhang Y; Kwong JS; Zhang C; Li S; Sun F; Niu Y; Du L
    J Evid Based Med; 2015 Feb; 8(1):2-10. PubMed ID: 25594108
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Applying Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) to diagnostic tests was challenging but doable.
    Gopalakrishna G; Mustafa RA; Davenport C; Scholten RJ; Hyde C; Brozek J; Schünemann HJ; Bossuyt PM; Leeflang MM; Langendam MW
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2014 Jul; 67(7):760-8. PubMed ID: 24725643
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The GRADE approach is reproducible in assessing the quality of evidence of quantitative evidence syntheses.
    Mustafa RA; Santesso N; Brozek J; Akl EA; Walter SD; Norman G; Kulasegaram M; Christensen R; Guyatt GH; Falck-Ytter Y; Chang S; Murad MH; Vist GE; Lasserson T; Gartlehner G; Shukla V; Sun X; Whittington C; Post PN; Lang E; Thaler K; Kunnamo I; Alenius H; Meerpohl JJ; Alba AC; Nevis IF; Gentles S; Ethier MC; Carrasco-Labra A; Khatib R; Nesrallah G; Kroft J; Selk A; Brignardello-Petersen R; Schünemann HJ
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2013 Jul; 66(7):736-42; quiz 742.e1-5. PubMed ID: 23623694
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Evidence-based medicine, systematic reviews, and guidelines in interventional pain management: part 5. Diagnostic accuracy studies.
    Manchikanti L; Derby R; Wolfer L; Singh V; Datta S; Hirsch JA
    Pain Physician; 2009; 12(3):517-40. PubMed ID: 19461821
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Computerised decision support systems in order communication for diagnostic, screening or monitoring test ordering: systematic reviews of the effects and cost-effectiveness of systems.
    Main C; Moxham T; Wyatt JC; Kay J; Anderson R; Stein K
    Health Technol Assess; 2010 Oct; 14(48):1-227. PubMed ID: 21034668
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Conscious sedation guidance.
    Coulthard P
    Evid Based Dent; 2006; 7(4):90-1. PubMed ID: 17187034
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Procedures and methods of benefit assessments for medicines in Germany.
    Bekkering GE; Kleijnen J
    Eur J Health Econ; 2008 Nov; 9 Suppl 1():5-29. PubMed ID: 18987905
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Application of GRADE: making evidence-based recommendations about diagnostic tests in clinical practice guidelines.
    Hsu J; Brożek JL; Terracciano L; Kreis J; Compalati E; Stein AT; Fiocchi A; Schünemann HJ
    Implement Sci; 2011 Jun; 6():62. PubMed ID: 21663655
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Tools for assessing the content of guidelines are needed to enable their effective use--a systematic comparison.
    Eikermann M; Holzmann N; Siering U; Rüther A
    BMC Res Notes; 2014 Nov; 7():853. PubMed ID: 25427972
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Evidence-based medicine, systematic reviews, and guidelines in interventional pain management: Part 7: systematic reviews and meta-analyses of diagnostic accuracy studies.
    Manchikanti L; Derby R; Wolfer L; Singh V; Datta S; Hirsch JA
    Pain Physician; 2009; 12(6):929-63. PubMed ID: 19935980
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Clinical guidelines and payer policies on fusion for the treatment of chronic low back pain.
    Cheng JS; Lee MJ; Massicotte E; Ashman B; Gruenberg M; Pilcher LE; Skelly AC
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2011 Oct; 36(21 Suppl):S144-63. PubMed ID: 21952186
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.