These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

149 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28916853)

  • 1. Ironic capture: top-down expectations exacerbate distraction in visual search.
    Huffman G; Rajsic J; Pratt J
    Psychol Res; 2019 Jul; 83(5):1070-1082. PubMed ID: 28916853
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Feature singletons attract spatial attention independently of feature priming.
    Yashar A; White AL; Fang W; Carrasco M
    J Vis; 2017 Aug; 17(9):7. PubMed ID: 28800369
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Attentional capture by salient color singleton distractors is modulated by top-down dimensional set.
    Müller HJ; Geyer T; Zehetleitner M; Krummenacher J
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2009 Feb; 35(1):1-16. PubMed ID: 19170466
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Cognitive load modulates attentional capture by color singletons during effortful visual search.
    Burnham BR
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2010 Sep; 135(1):50-8. PubMed ID: 20510910
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Distractor's salience does not determine feature suppression: A commentary on Wang and Theeuwes (2020).
    Ramgir A; Lamy D
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2023 Jun; 49(6):852-861. PubMed ID: 37276124
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Target uncertainty does not lead to more distraction by singletons: intertrial priming does.
    Pinto Y; Olivers CN; Theeuwes J
    Percept Psychophys; 2005 Nov; 67(8):1354-61. PubMed ID: 16555587
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Effect of task set-modulating attentional capture depends on the distractor cost in visual search: evidence from N2pc.
    Zhao D; Liang S; Jin Z; Li L
    Neuroreport; 2014 Jul; 25(10):737-42. PubMed ID: 24840929
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Feature-based statistical regularities of distractors modulate attentional capture.
    Stilwell BT; Bahle B; Vecera SP
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2019 Mar; 45(3):419-433. PubMed ID: 30802131
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Top-down and bottom-up attentional control: on the nature of interference from a salient distractor.
    Kim MS; Cave KR
    Percept Psychophys; 1999 Aug; 61(6):1009-23. PubMed ID: 10497423
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A search order lost effect: ignoring a singleton distractor affects visual search efficiency.
    Kumada T
    Vision Res; 2010 Jun; 50(14):1402-13. PubMed ID: 20025896
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Statistical regularities modulate attentional capture independent of search strategy.
    Wang B; Theeuwes J
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2018 Oct; 80(7):1763-1774. PubMed ID: 29968080
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Distractor context manipulation in visual search: How expectations modulate proactive control.
    Petilli MA; Marini F; Daini R
    Cognition; 2020 Mar; 196():104129. PubMed ID: 31765925
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Irrelevant singletons in visual search do not capture attention but can produce nonspatial filtering costs.
    Wykowska A; Schubö A
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2011 Mar; 23(3):645-60. PubMed ID: 19929330
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Does a salient distractor capture attention early in processing?
    Lamy D; Tsal Y; Egeth HE
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2003 Sep; 10(3):621-9. PubMed ID: 14620356
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Evidence for attentional capture by a surprising color singleton in visual search.
    Horstmann G
    Psychol Sci; 2002 Nov; 13(6):499-505. PubMed ID: 12430832
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Changes in visual cortical processing attenuate singleton distraction during visual search.
    Won BY; Forloines M; Zhou Z; Geng JJ
    Cortex; 2020 Nov; 132():309-321. PubMed ID: 33010740
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Selection history alters attentional filter settings persistently and beyond top-down control.
    Kadel H; Feldmann-Wüstefeld T; Schubö A
    Psychophysiology; 2017 May; 54(5):736-754. PubMed ID: 28169422
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Bottom-up attention capture with distractor and target singletons defined in the same (color) dimension is not a matter of feature uncertainty.
    Weichselbaum H; Ansorge U
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2018 Aug; 80(6):1350-1361. PubMed ID: 29777515
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Ignoring the unknown: Attentional suppression of unpredictable visual distraction.
    Ma X; Abrams RA
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2023 Jan; 49(1):1-6. PubMed ID: 36227324
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Learned low priority of attention after training to suppress color singleton distractor.
    Huang Z; Li S
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2023 Apr; 85(3):814-824. PubMed ID: 36175765
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.