These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

146 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28916853)

  • 21. Salient stimuli capture attention and action.
    Kerzel D; Schönhammer J
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2013 Nov; 75(8):1633-43. PubMed ID: 23918550
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Attentional and oculomotor capture with static singletons.
    Theeuwes J; De Vries GJ; Godijn R
    Percept Psychophys; 2003 Jul; 65(5):735-46. PubMed ID: 12956581
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. You see what you have learned. Evidence for an interrelation of associative learning and visual selective attention.
    Feldmann-Wüstefeld T; Uengoer M; Schubö A
    Psychophysiology; 2015 Nov; 52(11):1483-97. PubMed ID: 26338030
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Target-nontarget similarity decreases search efficiency and increases stimulus-driven control in visual search.
    Barras C; Kerzel D
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2017 Oct; 79(7):2037-2043. PubMed ID: 28681179
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Visual marking inhibits singleton capture.
    Olivers CN; Humphreys GW
    Cogn Psychol; 2003 Aug; 47(1):1-42. PubMed ID: 12852934
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Attentional capture in singleton-detection and feature-search modes.
    Lamy D; Egeth HE
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2003 Oct; 29(5):1003-20. PubMed ID: 14585019
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Involuntary top-down control by search-irrelevant features: Visual working memory biases attention in an object-based manner.
    Foerster RM; Schneider WX
    Cognition; 2018 Mar; 172():37-45. PubMed ID: 29223864
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Classic Visual Search Effects in an Additional Singleton Task: An Open Dataset.
    Adam KCS; Patel T; Rangan N; Serences JT
    J Cogn; 2021; 4(1):34. PubMed ID: 34396037
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Taking a closer look at visual search: Just how feature-agnostic is singleton detection mode?
    Harris AM; Jacoby O; Remington RW; Travis SL; Mattingley JB
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2019 Apr; 81(3):654-665. PubMed ID: 30603988
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Explicit awareness supports conditional visual search in the retrieval guidance paradigm.
    Buttaccio DR; Lange ND; Hahn S; Thomas RP
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2014 Jan; 145():44-53. PubMed ID: 24291120
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Attentional capture during visual search is attenuated by target predictability: evidence from the N2pc, Pd, and topographic segmentation.
    Burra N; Kerzel D
    Psychophysiology; 2013 May; 50(5):422-30. PubMed ID: 23418888
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. The role of top-down spatial attention in contingent attentional capture.
    Huang W; Su Y; Zhen Y; Qu Z
    Psychophysiology; 2016 May; 53(5):650-62. PubMed ID: 26879628
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Attentional capture in driving displays.
    Arexis M; Maquestiaux F; Gaspelin N; Ruthruff E; Didierjean A
    Br J Psychol; 2017 May; 108(2):259-275. PubMed ID: 28369841
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Absence of attentional capture in parallel search is possible: a failure to replicate attentional capture in a non-singleton target search task.
    Wienrich C; Janczyk M
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2011 Oct; 73(7):2044-52. PubMed ID: 21805210
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. The visual hemifield asymmetry in the spatial blink during singleton search and feature search.
    Burnham BR; Rozell CA; Kasper A; Bianco NE; Delliturri A
    Brain Cogn; 2011 Apr; 75(3):261-72. PubMed ID: 21295901
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Target uncertainty does not lead to greater singleton distractor interference when target shapes are not interchangeable with nontarget shapes.
    Berry JH
    Vision Res; 2013 Mar; 80():31-40. PubMed ID: 23385060
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Search efficiency is not sufficient: The nature of search modulates stimulus-driven attention.
    Jung K; Han SW; Min Y
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2019 Jan; 81(1):61-70. PubMed ID: 30276609
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Top-down feature-based selection of matching features for audio-visual synchrony discrimination.
    Fujisaki W; Nishida S
    Neurosci Lett; 2008 Mar; 433(3):225-30. PubMed ID: 18281153
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Specific foreknowledge reduces auditory distraction by irrelevant speech.
    Röer JP; Bell R; Buchner A
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2015 Jun; 41(3):692-702. PubMed ID: 25621576
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Inhibition and anticipation in visual search: evidence from effects of color foreknowledge on preview search.
    Braithwaite JJ; Humphreys GW
    Percept Psychophys; 2003 Feb; 65(2):213-37. PubMed ID: 12713240
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.