These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
172 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28917087)
1. Evaluation of Four Different Restorative Materials for Restoration of the Periodontal Condition of Wedge-Shaped Defect: A Comparative Study. Ruan JY; Gong ZL; Zhang RZ; Zhang Z; Xu R; Li DX; Ren L; Tao H Med Sci Monit; 2017 Sep; 23():4462-4470. PubMed ID: 28917087 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Development of gingivitis around aged restorations of resin-modified glass ionomer cement, polyacid-modified resin composite (compomer) and resin composite. van Dijken JW; Sjöström S Clin Oral Investig; 1998 Dec; 2(4):180-3. PubMed ID: 10388391 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. [Clinical evaluation of wedge-shaped defect restored by gingival retraction technique]. Yang WJ; Shi GS; Liang LR; Ruan FC; Gao HJ; Tong YQ Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2007 Jun; 42(6):353-4. PubMed ID: 17888252 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparative physico-mechanical characterization of new hybrid restorative materials with conventional glass-ionomer and resin composite restorative materials. Gladys S; Van Meerbeek B; Braem M; Lambrechts P; Vanherle G J Dent Res; 1997 Apr; 76(4):883-94. PubMed ID: 9126185 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Surface hardness and wear of glass ionomers and compomers. Peutzfeldt A; García-Godoy F; Asmussen E Am J Dent; 1997 Feb; 10(1):15-7. PubMed ID: 9545914 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Dentine bond strength and microleakage of flowable composite, compomer and glass ionomer cement. Xie H; Zhang F; Wu Y; Chen C; Liu W Aust Dent J; 2008 Dec; 53(4):325-31. PubMed ID: 19133948 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Assessment of laminate technique using glass ionomer and resin composite for restoration of root filled teeth. Taha NA; Palamara JE; Messer HH J Dent; 2012 Aug; 40(8):617-23. PubMed ID: 22521705 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Inhibition of artificial secondary caries in root by fluoride-releasing restorative materials. Torii Y; Itota T; Okamoto M; Nakabo S; Nagamine M; Inoue K Oper Dent; 2001; 26(1):36-43. PubMed ID: 11203775 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The effect of restorative materials on cytokines in gingival crevicular fluid. Celik N; Askın S; Gul MA; Seven N Arch Oral Biol; 2017 Dec; 84():139-144. PubMed ID: 28992599 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Influence of dentin conditioning on bond strength of light-cured ionomer restorative materials and polyacid-modified composite resins. Buchalla W; Attin T; Hellwig E J Clin Dent; 1996; 7(4):81-4. PubMed ID: 9238882 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Periodontal Evaluation in Noncarious Cervical Lesions Restored with Resin-modified Glass-Ionomer Cement and Resin Composite: A Randomised Controlled Study. Carvalho RD; Nogueira COP; Silva APD; Mesquita JA; Salgado KHC; Medeiros MCDS; Gurgel BCV Oral Health Prev Dent; 2018; 16(2):131-136. PubMed ID: 29736491 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. 3-year clinical evaluation of a compomer, a resin-modified glass ionomer and a resin composite in Class III restorations. van Dijken JW Am J Dent; 1996 Oct; 9(5):195-8. PubMed ID: 9545903 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Influence of flowable materials on microleakage of nanofilled and hybrid Class II composite restorations with LED and QTH LCUs. Sadeghi M Indian J Dent Res; 2009; 20(2):159-63. PubMed ID: 19553715 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Two-year clinical evaluation of four polyacid-modified resin composites and a resin-modified glass-ionomer cement in Class V lesions. Ermiş RB Quintessence Int; 2002; 33(7):542-8. PubMed ID: 12165991 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]