These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

172 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28917087)

  • 1. Evaluation of Four Different Restorative Materials for Restoration of the Periodontal Condition of Wedge-Shaped Defect: A Comparative Study.
    Ruan JY; Gong ZL; Zhang RZ; Zhang Z; Xu R; Li DX; Ren L; Tao H
    Med Sci Monit; 2017 Sep; 23():4462-4470. PubMed ID: 28917087
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Development of gingivitis around aged restorations of resin-modified glass ionomer cement, polyacid-modified resin composite (compomer) and resin composite.
    van Dijken JW; Sjöström S
    Clin Oral Investig; 1998 Dec; 2(4):180-3. PubMed ID: 10388391
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [Clinical evaluation of wedge-shaped defect restored by gingival retraction technique].
    Yang WJ; Shi GS; Liang LR; Ruan FC; Gao HJ; Tong YQ
    Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2007 Jun; 42(6):353-4. PubMed ID: 17888252
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparative physico-mechanical characterization of new hybrid restorative materials with conventional glass-ionomer and resin composite restorative materials.
    Gladys S; Van Meerbeek B; Braem M; Lambrechts P; Vanherle G
    J Dent Res; 1997 Apr; 76(4):883-94. PubMed ID: 9126185
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Surface hardness and wear of glass ionomers and compomers.
    Peutzfeldt A; García-Godoy F; Asmussen E
    Am J Dent; 1997 Feb; 10(1):15-7. PubMed ID: 9545914
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Dentine bond strength and microleakage of flowable composite, compomer and glass ionomer cement.
    Xie H; Zhang F; Wu Y; Chen C; Liu W
    Aust Dent J; 2008 Dec; 53(4):325-31. PubMed ID: 19133948
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Assessment of laminate technique using glass ionomer and resin composite for restoration of root filled teeth.
    Taha NA; Palamara JE; Messer HH
    J Dent; 2012 Aug; 40(8):617-23. PubMed ID: 22521705
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Inhibition of artificial secondary caries in root by fluoride-releasing restorative materials.
    Torii Y; Itota T; Okamoto M; Nakabo S; Nagamine M; Inoue K
    Oper Dent; 2001; 26(1):36-43. PubMed ID: 11203775
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The effect of restorative materials on cytokines in gingival crevicular fluid.
    Celik N; Askın S; Gul MA; Seven N
    Arch Oral Biol; 2017 Dec; 84():139-144. PubMed ID: 28992599
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Influence of dentin conditioning on bond strength of light-cured ionomer restorative materials and polyacid-modified composite resins.
    Buchalla W; Attin T; Hellwig E
    J Clin Dent; 1996; 7(4):81-4. PubMed ID: 9238882
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Periodontal Evaluation in Noncarious Cervical Lesions Restored with Resin-modified Glass-Ionomer Cement and Resin Composite: A Randomised Controlled Study.
    Carvalho RD; Nogueira COP; Silva APD; Mesquita JA; Salgado KHC; Medeiros MCDS; Gurgel BCV
    Oral Health Prev Dent; 2018; 16(2):131-136. PubMed ID: 29736491
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Toxicity testing of restorative dental materials using brine shrimp larvae (Artemia salina).
    Milhem MM; Al-Hiyasat AS; Darmani H
    J Appl Oral Sci; 2008; 16(4):297-301. PubMed ID: 19089264
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Microleakage of glass ionomer cement composite resin and glass ionomer resin cement.
    Erdilek N; Ozata F; Sepetcioglu F
    J Clin Pediatr Dent; 1997; 21(4):311-4. PubMed ID: 9484117
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. 3-year clinical evaluation of a compomer, a resin-modified glass ionomer and a resin composite in Class III restorations.
    van Dijken JW
    Am J Dent; 1996 Oct; 9(5):195-8. PubMed ID: 9545903
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Influence of flowable materials on microleakage of nanofilled and hybrid Class II composite restorations with LED and QTH LCUs.
    Sadeghi M
    Indian J Dent Res; 2009; 20(2):159-63. PubMed ID: 19553715
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Laboratory strength of glass ionomer cement, compomers, and resin composites.
    Piwowarczyk A; Ottl P; Lauer HC; Büchler A
    J Prosthodont; 2002 Jun; 11(2):86-91. PubMed ID: 12087545
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Curing units' ability to cure restorative composites and dual-cured composite cements under composite overlay.
    Park SH; Kim SS; Cho YS; Lee CK; Noh BD
    Oper Dent; 2004; 29(6):627-35. PubMed ID: 15646217
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Tooth-colored filling materials for the restoration of cervical lesions: a 24-month follow-up study.
    Folwaczny M; Loher C; Mehl A; Kunzelmann KH; Hinkel R
    Oper Dent; 2000; 25(4):251-8. PubMed ID: 11203827
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Effective Expansion: Balance between Shrinkage and Hygroscopic Expansion.
    Suiter EA; Watson LE; Tantbirojn D; Lou JS; Versluis A
    J Dent Res; 2016 May; 95(5):543-9. PubMed ID: 26912221
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Two-year clinical evaluation of four polyacid-modified resin composites and a resin-modified glass-ionomer cement in Class V lesions.
    Ermiş RB
    Quintessence Int; 2002; 33(7):542-8. PubMed ID: 12165991
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.