These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

126 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28917241)

  • 1. Dietary sodium reduction in New Zealand: influence of the Tick label.
    Ning SX; Mainvil LA; Thomson RK; McLean RM
    Asia Pac J Clin Nutr; 2017; 26(6):1133-1138. PubMed ID: 28917241
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Tick front-of-pack label has a positive nutritional impact on foods sold in New Zealand.
    Thomson RK; McLean RM; Ning SX; Mainvil LA
    Public Health Nutr; 2016 Nov; 19(16):2949-2958. PubMed ID: 27356176
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Impact of the Pick the Tick food information programme on the salt content of food in New Zealand.
    Young L; Swinburn B
    Health Promot Int; 2002 Mar; 17(1):13-9. PubMed ID: 11847134
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Effects of a Voluntary Front-of-Pack Nutrition Labelling System on Packaged Food Reformulation: The Health Star Rating System in New Zealand.
    Mhurchu CN; Eyles H; Choi YH
    Nutrients; 2017 Aug; 9(8):. PubMed ID: 28829380
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A case study of sodium reduction in breakfast cereals and the impact of the Pick the Tick food information program in Australia.
    Williams P; McMahon A; Boustead R
    Health Promot Int; 2003 Mar; 18(1):51-6. PubMed ID: 12571092
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Nutritional quality, labelling and promotion of breakfast cereals on the New Zealand market.
    Devi A; Eyles H; Rayner M; Ni Mhurchu C; Swinburn B; Lonsdale-Cooper E; Vandevijvere S
    Appetite; 2014 Oct; 81():253-60. PubMed ID: 24953195
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Effects of alternative label formats on choice of high- and low-sodium products in a New Zealand population sample.
    McLean R; Hoek J; Hedderley D
    Public Health Nutr; 2012 May; 15(5):783-91. PubMed ID: 22281127
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Changes in the sodium content of New Zealand processed foods: 2003-2013.
    Monro D; Mhurchu CN; Jiang Y; Gorton D; Eyles H
    Nutrients; 2015 May; 7(6):4054-67. PubMed ID: 26024294
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Contribution of major food companies and their products to household dietary sodium purchases in Australia.
    Coyle DH; Shahid M; Dunford EK; Mhurchu CN; Mckee S; Santos M; Popkin BM; Trieu K; Marklund M; Taylor F; Neal B; Wu JHY
    Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act; 2020 Jun; 17(1):81. PubMed ID: 32576211
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Performance of a five category front-of-pack labelling system - the 5-colour nutrition label - to differentiate nutritional quality of breakfast cereals in France.
    Julia C; Kesse-Guyot E; Ducrot P; Péneau S; Touvier M; Méjean C; Hercberg S
    BMC Public Health; 2015 Feb; 15():179. PubMed ID: 25885583
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Key opportunities for sodium reduction in New Zealand processed foods.
    Woodward E; Eyles H; Ni Mhurchu C
    Aust N Z J Public Health; 2012 Feb; 36(1):84-9. PubMed ID: 22313711
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Which companies dominate the packaged food supply of New Zealand and how healthy are their products?
    Mackay S; Eyles H; Gontijo de Castro T; Young L; Ni Mhurchu C; Swinburn B
    PLoS One; 2021; 16(1):e0245225. PubMed ID: 33497402
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Changes in Average Sodium Content of Prepacked Foods in Slovenia during 2011-2015.
    Pravst I; Lavriša Ž; Kušar A; Miklavec K; Žmitek K
    Nutrients; 2017 Aug; 9(9):. PubMed ID: 28850061
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Sources of sodium in Australian children's diets and the effect of the application of sodium targets to food products to reduce sodium intake.
    Grimes CA; Campbell KJ; Riddell LJ; Nowson CA
    Br J Nutr; 2011 Feb; 105(3):468-77. PubMed ID: 20875190
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Sodium in the New Zealand diet: proposed voluntary food reformulation targets will not meet the WHO goal of a 30% reduction in total sodium intake.
    Wang NX; Skeaff S; Cameron C; Fleming E; McLean RM
    Eur J Nutr; 2022 Sep; 61(6):3067-3076. PubMed ID: 35353200
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Evaluation of Australian soup manufacturer compliance with national sodium reduction targets.
    Levi R; Probst Y; Crino M; Dunford E
    Nutr Diet; 2018 Apr; 75(2):200-205. PubMed ID: 29083119
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Impact of Different Front-of-Pack Nutrition Labels on Consumer Purchasing Intentions: A Randomized Controlled Trial.
    Ducrot P; Julia C; Méjean C; Kesse-Guyot E; Touvier M; Fezeu LK; Hercberg S; Péneau S
    Am J Prev Med; 2016 May; 50(5):627-636. PubMed ID: 26699246
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Sodium Reduction in Processed Foods in Brazil: Analysis of Food Categories and Voluntary Targets from 2011 to 2017.
    Nilson EAF; Spaniol AM; Gonçalves VSS; Moura I; Silva SA; L'Abbé M; Jaime PC
    Nutrients; 2017 Jul; 9(7):. PubMed ID: 28704932
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Nutrition and health claims on healthy and less-healthy packaged food products in New Zealand.
    Al-Ani HH; Devi A; Eyles H; Swinburn B; Vandevijvere S
    Br J Nutr; 2016 Sep; 116(6):1087-94. PubMed ID: 27503596
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Stakeholders' perceptions regarding a salt reduction strategy for India: Findings from qualitative research.
    Gupta P; Mohan S; Johnson C; Garg V; Thout SR; Shivashankar R; Krishnan A; Neal B; Prabhakaran D
    PLoS One; 2018; 13(8):e0201707. PubMed ID: 30080888
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.