These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

121 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28917659)

  • 1. Sonification of scalp-recorded frequency-following responses (FFRs) offers improved response detection over conventional statistical metrics.
    Bidelman GM
    J Neurosci Methods; 2018 Jan; 293():59-66. PubMed ID: 28917659
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Subcortical rather than cortical sources of the frequency-following response (FFR) relate to speech-in-noise perception in normal-hearing listeners.
    Bidelman GM; Momtaz S
    Neurosci Lett; 2021 Feb; 746():135664. PubMed ID: 33497718
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Objective information-theoretic algorithm for detecting brainstem-evoked responses to complex stimuli.
    Bidelman GM
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2014 Sep; 25(8):715-26. PubMed ID: 25380118
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Response properties of the human frequency-following response (FFR) to speech and non-speech sounds: level dependence, adaptation and phase-locking limits.
    Bidelman G; Powers L
    Int J Audiol; 2018 Sep; 57(9):665-672. PubMed ID: 29764252
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Brainstem correlates of concurrent speech identification in adverse listening conditions.
    Yellamsetty A; Bidelman GM
    Brain Res; 2019 Jul; 1714():182-192. PubMed ID: 30796895
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Listening to the brainstem: musicianship enhances intelligibility of subcortical representations for speech.
    Weiss MW; Bidelman GM
    J Neurosci; 2015 Jan; 35(4):1687-91. PubMed ID: 25632143
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Objective detection of auditory steady-state evoked potentials based on mutual information.
    Bidelman GM; Bhagat SP
    Int J Audiol; 2016; 55(5):313-9. PubMed ID: 26924597
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Subcortical sources dominate the neuroelectric auditory frequency-following response to speech.
    Bidelman GM
    Neuroimage; 2018 Jul; 175():56-69. PubMed ID: 29604459
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Cortical Correlates of the Auditory Frequency-Following and Onset Responses: EEG and fMRI Evidence.
    Coffey EBJ; Musacchia G; Zatorre RJ
    J Neurosci; 2017 Jan; 37(4):830-838. PubMed ID: 28123019
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Neural generators of the frequency-following response elicited to stimuli of low and high frequency: A magnetoencephalographic (MEG) study.
    Gorina-Careta N; Kurkela JLO; Hämäläinen J; Astikainen P; Escera C
    Neuroimage; 2021 May; 231():117866. PubMed ID: 33592244
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Improved Detection of Vowel Envelope Frequency Following Responses Using Hotelling's T2 Analysis.
    Vanheusden FJ; Bell SL; Chesnaye MA; Simpson DM
    Ear Hear; 2019; 40(1):116-127. PubMed ID: 29757799
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Towards an optimal paradigm for simultaneously recording cortical and brainstem auditory evoked potentials.
    Bidelman GM
    J Neurosci Methods; 2015 Feb; 241():94-100. PubMed ID: 25561397
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Brainstem-cortical functional connectivity for speech is differentially challenged by noise and reverberation.
    Bidelman GM; Davis MK; Pridgen MH
    Hear Res; 2018 Sep; 367():149-160. PubMed ID: 29871826
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Neural Correlates of the Binaural Masking Level Difference in Human Frequency-Following Responses.
    Clinard CG; Hodgson SL; Scherer ME
    J Assoc Res Otolaryngol; 2017 Apr; 18(2):355-369. PubMed ID: 27896486
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Recording the human brainstem frequency-following-response in the free-field.
    Gama N; Peretz I; Lehmann A
    J Neurosci Methods; 2017 Mar; 280():47-53. PubMed ID: 28185890
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Frequency-dependent fine structure in the frequency-following response: The byproduct of multiple generators.
    Tichko P; Skoe E
    Hear Res; 2017 May; 348():1-15. PubMed ID: 28137699
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Multichannel recordings of the human brainstem frequency-following response: scalp topography, source generators, and distinctions from the transient ABR.
    Bidelman GM
    Hear Res; 2015 May; 323():68-80. PubMed ID: 25660195
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Attention reinforces human corticofugal system to aid speech perception in noise.
    Price CN; Bidelman GM
    Neuroimage; 2021 Jul; 235():118014. PubMed ID: 33794356
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Brain responses reveal hardwired detection of native-language rule violations.
    Aaltonen O; Hellström A; Peltola MS; Savela J; Tamminen H; Lehtola H
    Neurosci Lett; 2008 Oct; 444(1):56-9. PubMed ID: 18706481
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Effects of age and task difficulty on ERP responses to novel sounds presented during a speech-perception-in-noise test.
    Bertoli S; Bodmer D
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2016 Jan; 127(1):360-368. PubMed ID: 25840528
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.