185 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28918078)
1. Assessment of environmental impacts and operational costs of the implementation of an innovative source-separated urine treatment.
Igos E; Besson M; Navarrete Gutiérrez T; Bisinella de Faria AB; Benetto E; Barna L; Ahmadi A; Spérandio M
Water Res; 2017 Dec; 126():50-59. PubMed ID: 28918078
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Life cycle comparison of centralized wastewater treatment and urine source separation with struvite precipitation: Focus on urine nutrient management.
Ishii SK; Boyer TH
Water Res; 2015 Aug; 79():88-103. PubMed ID: 25973581
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Life cycle assessment and costing of urine source separation: Focus on nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug removal.
Landry KA; Boyer TH
Water Res; 2016 Nov; 105():487-495. PubMed ID: 27668993
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Macro-nutrients recovery from liquid waste as a sustainable resource for production of recovered mineral fertilizer: Uncovering alternative options to sustain global food security cost-effectively.
Sniatala B; Kurniawan TA; Sobotka D; Makinia J; Othman MHD
Sci Total Environ; 2023 Jan; 856(Pt 2):159283. PubMed ID: 36208738
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Life-cycle assessment and techno-economic evaluation of the value chain in nutrient recovery from wastewater treatment plants for agricultural application.
Mayor Á; Vinardell S; Ganesan K; Bacardí C; Cortina JL; Valderrama C
Sci Total Environ; 2023 Sep; 892():164452. PubMed ID: 37245830
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Evaluation of new alternatives in wastewater treatment plants based on dynamic modelling and life cycle assessment (DM-LCA).
Bisinella de Faria AB; Spérandio M; Ahmadi A; Tiruta-Barna L
Water Res; 2015 Nov; 84():99-111. PubMed ID: 26218463
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. From municipal/industrial wastewater sludge and FOG to fertilizer: A proposal for economic sustainable sludge management.
Bratina B; Šorgo A; Kramberger J; Ajdnik U; Zemljič LF; Ekart J; Šafarič R
J Environ Manage; 2016 Dec; 183(Pt 3):1009-1025. PubMed ID: 27692514
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Environmental impact of recycling nutrients in human excreta to agriculture compared with enhanced wastewater treatment.
Spångberg J; Tidåker P; Jönsson H
Sci Total Environ; 2014 Sep; 493():209-19. PubMed ID: 24946033
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Is SCENA a good approach for side-stream integrated treatment from an environmental and economic point of view?
Longo S; Frison N; Renzi D; Fatone F; Hospido A
Water Res; 2017 Nov; 125():478-489. PubMed ID: 28910743
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Opportunities for Building-Scale Urine Diversion and Challenges for Implementation.
Boyer TH; Saetta D
Acc Chem Res; 2019 Apr; 52(4):886-895. PubMed ID: 30908003
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Techno-economic and environmental assessment of sewage sludge wet oxidation.
Bertanza G; Canato M; Heimersson S; Laera G; Salvetti R; Slavik E; Svanström M
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2015 May; 22(10):7327-38. PubMed ID: 25091166
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparative LCA of decentralized wastewater treatment alternatives for non-potable urban reuse.
Opher T; Friedler E
J Environ Manage; 2016 Nov; 182():464-476. PubMed ID: 27526084
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Nutrients in urine: energetic aspects of removal and recovery.
Maurer M; Schwegler P; Larsen TA
Water Sci Technol; 2003; 48(1):37-46. PubMed ID: 12926619
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Investigation of the environmental impacts of municipal wastewater treatment plants through a Life Cycle Assessment software tool.
De Feo G; Ferrara C
Environ Technol; 2017 Aug; 38(15):1943-1948. PubMed ID: 27667029
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Environmental performance of an integrated water supply and wastewater system through life cycle assessment - A Brazilian case study.
Boldrin MTN; Formiga KTM; Pacca SA
Sci Total Environ; 2022 Aug; 835():155213. PubMed ID: 35421497
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Increasing resource circularity in wastewater treatment: Environmental implications of technological upgrades.
Rufí-Salís M; Petit-Boix A; Leipold S; Villalba G; Rieradevall J; Moliné E; Gabarrell X; Carrera J; Suárez-Ojeda ME
Sci Total Environ; 2022 Sep; 838(Pt 3):156422. PubMed ID: 35662600
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Environmental and Economic Impacts of Managing Nutrients in Digestate Derived from Sewage Sludge and High-Strength Organic Waste.
Orner KD; Smith S; Nordahl S; Chakrabarti A; Breunig H; Scown CD; Leverenz H; Nelson KL; Horvath A
Environ Sci Technol; 2022 Dec; 56(23):17256-17265. PubMed ID: 36409840
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Low-cost struvite production using source-separated urine in Nepal.
Etter B; Tilley E; Khadka R; Udert KM
Water Res; 2011 Jan; 45(2):852-62. PubMed ID: 20980038
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Efficiency of wastewater treatment facilities: The influence of scale economies.
Hernández-Chover V; Bellver-Domingo Á; Hernández-Sancho F
J Environ Manage; 2018 Dec; 228():77-84. PubMed ID: 30212677
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Environmental sustainability of an energy self-sufficient sewage treatment plant: improvements through DEMON and co-digestion.
Schaubroeck T; De Clippeleir H; Weissenbacher N; Dewulf J; Boeckx P; Vlaeminck SE; Wett B
Water Res; 2015 May; 74():166-79. PubMed ID: 25727156
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
