These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

128 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28918105)

  • 1. Factors influencing women's decision making in hysterectomy.
    Janda M; Armfield NR; Page K; Kerr G; Kurz S; Jackson G; Currie J; Weaver E; Yazdani A; Obermair A
    Patient Educ Couns; 2018 Mar; 101(3):504-510. PubMed ID: 28918105
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Surgical approach to hysterectomy and barriers to using minimally invasive methods.
    Janda M; Armfield NR; Kerr G; Kurz S; Jackson G; Currie J; Page K; Weaver E; Yazdani A; Obermair A
    Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol; 2018 Dec; 58(6):690-695. PubMed ID: 29763509
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Women's hysterectomy experiences and decision-making.
    Uskul AK; Ahmad F; Leyland NA; Stewart DE
    Women Health; 2003; 38(1):53-67. PubMed ID: 14535606
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The effect of a gynecologist-interventional radiologist relationship on selection of treatment modality for the patient with uterine myoma.
    Zurawin RK; Fischer JH; Amir L
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2010; 17(2):214-21. PubMed ID: 20226411
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Minimally invasive hysterectomy for benign indications: an update.
    Bretschneider CE; Jallad K; Paraiso MFR
    Minerva Ginecol; 2017 Jun; 69(3):295-303. PubMed ID: 28177208
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Women's perceptions of decision-making about hysterectomy.
    Skea Z; Harry V; Bhattacharya S; Entwistle V; Williams B; MacLennan G; Templeton A
    BJOG; 2004 Feb; 111(2):133-42. PubMed ID: 14723750
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Which surgical decisions should patients participate in and how? Reflections on women's recollections of discussions about variants of hysterectomy.
    Entwistle V; Williams B; Skea Z; MacLennan G; Bhattacharya S
    Soc Sci Med; 2006 Jan; 62(2):499-509. PubMed ID: 16033702
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Subtotal versus total laparoscopic hysterectomy: could women sexual function recovery overcome the surgical outcomes in pre-operatory decision making?
    Saccardi C; Gizzo S; Noventa M; Quaranta M; Borgato S; Conte L; Pluchino N; Litta P
    Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2015 Jun; 291(6):1321-6. PubMed ID: 25501834
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Shared Decision-Making to Improve Patient Engagement in Minimally Invasive Hysterectomy.
    McCarus SD; Wiercinski K; Heidrich N
    Surg Technol Int; 2019 May; 34():265-268. PubMed ID: 30472723
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Predictors of hysterectomy as a treatment for menstrual symptoms.
    Graham M; James EL; Keleher H
    Womens Health Issues; 2008; 18(4):319-27. PubMed ID: 18590884
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Promoting Same-Day Discharge for Gynecologic Oncology Patients in Minimally Invasive Hysterectomy.
    Fountain CR; Havrilesky LJ
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2017; 24(6):932-939. PubMed ID: 28501452
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A qualitative comparison of women's attitudes toward hysterectomy and myomectomy.
    Askew J
    Health Care Women Int; 2009 Aug; 30(8):728-42. PubMed ID: 19575324
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The impact of robotics on the mode of benign hysterectomy and clinical outcomes.
    Luciano AA; Luciano DE; Gabbert J; Seshadri-Kreaden U
    Int J Med Robot; 2016 Mar; 12(1):114-24. PubMed ID: 25753111
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Minimally invasive hysterectomies-a survey on attitudes and barriers among practicing gynecologists.
    Einarsson JI; Matteson KA; Schulkin J; Chavan NR; Sangi-Haghpeykar H
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2010; 17(2):167-75. PubMed ID: 20226403
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A Swedish population-based evaluation of benign hysterectomy, comparing minimally invasive and abdominal surgery.
    Billfeldt NK; Borgfeldt C; Lindkvist H; Stjerndahl JH; Ankardal M
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2018 Mar; 222():113-118. PubMed ID: 29408741
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The role of male partners in women's decision making regarding hysterectomy.
    Richter DL; McKeown RE; Corwin SJ; Rheaume C; Fraser J
    J Womens Health Gend Based Med; 2000; 9 Suppl 2():S51-61. PubMed ID: 10714745
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Open abdominal versus laparoscopic and vaginal hysterectomy: analysis of a large United States payer measuring quality and cost of care.
    Warren L; Ladapo JA; Borah BJ; Gunnarsson CL
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2009; 16(5):581-8. PubMed ID: 19835801
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Effect of robotic surgery on hysterectomy trends: implications for resident education.
    Yamasato K; Casey D; Kaneshiro B; Hiraoka M
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2014; 21(3):399-405. PubMed ID: 24172026
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Factors predicting choice of treatment for menorrhagia in gynaecology outpatient clinics.
    Vuorma S; Rissanen P; Aalto AM; Kujansuu E; Hurskainen R; Teperi J
    Soc Sci Med; 2003 Apr; 56(8):1653-60. PubMed ID: 12639582
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Decisions about treatment: interpretations of two measures of control by women having a hysterectomy.
    Entwistle VA; Skea ZC; O'Donnell MT
    Soc Sci Med; 2001 Sep; 53(6):721-32. PubMed ID: 11511048
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.