These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
289 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28919165)
1. Validation of the Vectra H1 portable three-dimensional photogrammetry system for facial imaging. Camison L; Bykowski M; Lee WW; Carlson JC; Roosenboom J; Goldstein JA; Losee JE; Weinberg SM Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2018 Mar; 47(3):403-410. PubMed ID: 28919165 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Are Portable Stereophotogrammetric Devices Reliable in Facial Imaging? A Validation Study of VECTRA H1 Device. Gibelli D; Pucciarelli V; Cappella A; Dolci C; Sforza C J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2018 Aug; 76(8):1772-1784. PubMed ID: 29458028 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Validation of two handheld devices against a non-portable three-dimensional surface scanner and assessment of potential use for intraoperative facial imaging. Koban KC; Perko P; Etzel L; Li Z; Schenck TL; Giunta RE J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg; 2020 Jan; 73(1):141-148. PubMed ID: 31519501 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Three-dimensional facial anatomy evaluation: Reliability of laser scanner consecutive scans procedure in comparison with stereophotogrammetry. Gibelli D; Pucciarelli V; Poppa P; Cummaudo M; Dolci C; Cattaneo C; Sforza C J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2018 Oct; 46(10):1807-1813. PubMed ID: 30097408 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Accuracy, repeatability and reproducibility of a handheld three-dimensional facial imaging device: The Vectra H1. Savoldelli C; Benat G; Castillo L; Chamorey E; Lutz JC J Stomatol Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2019 Sep; 120(4):289-296. PubMed ID: 30922712 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Validation of a low-cost laser scanner device for the assessment of three-dimensional facial anatomy in living subjects. Gibelli D; Pucciarelli V; Caplova Z; Cappella A; Dolci C; Cattaneo C; Sforza C J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2018 Sep; 46(9):1493-1499. PubMed ID: 30196857 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. An Assessment of How Facial Mimicry Can Change Facial Morphology: Implications for Identification. Gibelli D; De Angelis D; Poppa P; Sforza C; Cattaneo C J Forensic Sci; 2017 Mar; 62(2):405-410. PubMed ID: 27907238 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Evaluation of a portable low-budget three-dimensional stereophotogrammetry system for nasal analysis. Ritschl LM; Grill FD; Mittermeier F; Lonic D; Wolff KD; Roth M; Loeffelbein DJ J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2018 Dec; 46(12):2008-2016. PubMed ID: 30322779 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Sources of variation in the 3dMDface and Vectra H1 3D facial imaging systems. White JD; Ortega-Castrillon A; Virgo C; Indencleef K; Hoskens H; Shriver MD; Claes P Sci Rep; 2020 Mar; 10(1):4443. PubMed ID: 32157192 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Validation of Vectra 3D Imaging Systems: A Review. De Stefani A; Barone M; Hatami Alamdari S; Barjami A; Baciliero U; Apolloni F; Gracco A; Bruno G Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2022 Jul; 19(14):. PubMed ID: 35886670 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Evaluation of the 3dMDface system as a tool for soft tissue analysis. Hong C; Choi K; Kachroo Y; Kwon T; Nguyen A; McComb R; Moon W Orthod Craniofac Res; 2017 Jun; 20 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):119-124. PubMed ID: 28643910 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Testing photogrammetry-based techniques for three-dimensional surface documentation in forensic pathology. Urbanová P; Hejna P; Jurda M Forensic Sci Int; 2015 May; 250():77-86. PubMed ID: 25818581 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Validation of three-dimensional facial imaging captured with smartphone-based photogrammetry application in comparison to stereophotogrammetry system. Andrews J; Alwafi A; Bichu YM; Pliska BT; Mostafa N; Zou B Heliyon; 2023 May; 9(5):e15834. PubMed ID: 37180897 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Reliability of Periocular Anthropometry: A Comparison of Direct, 2-Dimensional, and 3-Dimensional Techniques. Guo Y; Hou X; Rokohl AC; Jia R; Heindl LM Dermatol Surg; 2020 Sep; 46(9):e23-e31. PubMed ID: 31809350 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Three-Dimensional Imaging of the Face: A Comparison Between Three Different Imaging Modalities. Verhulst A; Hol M; Vreeken R; Becking A; Ulrich D; Maal T Aesthet Surg J; 2018 May; 38(6):579-585. PubMed ID: 29360971 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Portable three-dimensional imaging to monitor small volume enhancement in face, vulva, and hand: A comparative study. Almadori A; Speiser S; Ashby I; Lacher R; Bishop D; Mosahebi A; Butler PE J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg; 2022 Sep; 75(9):3574-3585. PubMed ID: 35659734 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Validation of a low-cost portable 3-dimensional face scanner. Liu C; Artopoulos A Imaging Sci Dent; 2019 Mar; 49(1):35-43. PubMed ID: 30941286 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Validation of low-cost mobile phone applications and comparison with professional imaging systems for three-dimensional facial imaging: A pilot study. Loy RCH; Liew MKM; Yong CW; Wong RCW J Dent; 2023 Oct; 137():104676. PubMed ID: 37633483 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. High-Fidelity Anthropometric Facial Measurements Can Be Obtained From a Single Stereophotograph From the Vectra H1 3-Dimensional Camera. Jodeh DS; Rottgers SA Cleft Palate Craniofac J; 2019 Oct; 56(9):1164-1170. PubMed ID: 30955356 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]