These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

150 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28919655)

  • 21. Does human germline genome editing violate human dignity? An African perspective.
    Shozi B
    J Law Biosci; 2021; 8(1):lsab002. PubMed ID: 33986951
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Integrating justice and care in animal ethics.
    Lekan T
    J Appl Philos; 2004; 21(2):183-95. PubMed ID: 15462029
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Further defence of legal age change: a reply to the critics.
    Räsänen J
    J Med Ethics; 2019 Jul; 45(7):471-472. PubMed ID: 31256006
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Ordo-Responsibility for Germline Gene Editing.
    Ranisch R; Rudolph T; Cremer HJ; Knoepffler N
    CRISPR J; 2020 Feb; 3(1):37-43. PubMed ID: 32091257
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Why Tolerate Conscientious Objections in Medicine.
    Harter TD
    HEC Forum; 2021 Sep; 33(3):175-188. PubMed ID: 31410637
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Research ethics committees: differences and moral judgement.
    Edwards SJ; Ashcroft R; Kirchin S
    Bioethics; 2004 Sep; 18(5):408-27. PubMed ID: 15462024
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. The harmful, nontherapeutic use of animals in research is morally wrong.
    Nobis N
    Am J Med Sci; 2011 Oct; 342(4):297-304. PubMed ID: 21952174
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Islamic Perspectives on CRISPR/Cas9-Mediated Human Germline Gene Editing: A Preliminary Discussion.
    Isa NM; Zulkifli NA; Man S
    Sci Eng Ethics; 2020 Feb; 26(1):309-323. PubMed ID: 30830592
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Replication, reanalysis, and gene expression: ME2 and genetic generalized epilepsy.
    Wang M; Greenberg DA; Stewart WCL
    Epilepsia; 2019 Mar; 60(3):539-546. PubMed ID: 30719716
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Util-izing animals.
    LaFollette H; Shanks N
    J Appl Philos; 1995; 12(1):13-25. PubMed ID: 12416523
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Human germline gene editing. Recommendations of ESHG and ESHRE.
    de Wert G; Pennings G; Clarke A; Eichenlaub-Ritter U; van El CG; Forzano F; Goddijn M; Heindryckx B; Howard HC; Radojkovic D; Rial-Sebbag E; Tarlatzis BC; Cornel MC;
    Hum Reprod Open; 2018; 2018(1):hox025. PubMed ID: 31490463
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Better brains, better selves? The ethics of neuroenhancements.
    Dees RH
    Kennedy Inst Ethics J; 2007 Dec; 17(4):371-95. PubMed ID: 18363271
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. The Ethics of Human Life Extension: The Second Argument from Evolution.
    Gyngell C
    J Med Philos; 2015 Dec; 40(6):696-713. PubMed ID: 26453907
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Making sense of heritable human genome editing: Scientific and ethical considerations.
    Greenfield A
    Prog Mol Biol Transl Sci; 2021; 182():1-28. PubMed ID: 34175039
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. The dual-use problem, scientific isolationism and the division of moral labour.
    Douglas T
    Monash Bioeth Rev; 2014; 32(1-2):86-105. PubMed ID: 25434066
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Moving Beyond 'Therapy' and 'Enhancement' in the Ethics of Gene Editing.
    Cwik B
    Camb Q Healthc Ethics; 2019 Oct; 28(4):695-707. PubMed ID: 31526421
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Are You Morally Modified?: The Moral Effects of Widely Used Pharmaceuticals.
    Levy N; Douglas T; Kahane G; Terbeck S; Cowen PJ; Hewstone M; Savulescu J
    Philos Psychiatr Psychol; 2014 Jun; 21(2):111-125. PubMed ID: 25892904
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Ethical Considerations in Therapeutic Clinical Trials Involving Novel Human Germline-Editing Technology.
    Brokowski C; Adli M
    CRISPR J; 2020 Feb; 3(1):18-26. PubMed ID: 32091258
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Conceptualising morally permissible risk imposition without quantified individual risks.
    Burri S
    Synthese; 2022; 200(5):415. PubMed ID: 36213438
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Necessary conditions for morally responsible animal research.
    DeGrazia D; Sebo J
    Camb Q Healthc Ethics; 2015 Oct; 24(4):420-30. PubMed ID: 26364777
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.