BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

285 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28919727)

  • 1. Five-year durability of stand-alone interspinous process decompression for lumbar spinal stenosis.
    Nunley PD; Patel VV; Orndorff DG; Lavelle WF; Block JE; Geisler FH
    Clin Interv Aging; 2017; 12():1409-1417. PubMed ID: 28919727
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Superion Interspinous Spacer Treatment of Moderate Spinal Stenosis: 4-Year Results.
    Nunley PD; Patel VV; Orndorff DG; Lavelle WF; Block JE; Geisler FH
    World Neurosurg; 2017 Aug; 104():279-283. PubMed ID: 28479526
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Stand-alone interspinous spacer versus decompressive laminectomy for treatment of lumbar spinal stenosis.
    Lauryssen C; Jackson RJ; Baron JM; Tallarico RA; Lavelle WF; Deutsch H; Block JE; Geisler FH
    Expert Rev Med Devices; 2015; 12(6):763-9. PubMed ID: 26487285
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Superion interspinous process spacer for intermittent neurogenic claudication secondary to moderate lumbar spinal stenosis: two-year results from a randomized controlled FDA-IDE pivotal trial.
    Patel VV; Whang PG; Haley TR; Bradley WD; Nunley PD; Davis RP; Miller LE; Block JE; Geisler FH
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2015 Mar; 40(5):275-82. PubMed ID: 25494323
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Prospective, randomized, multicenter study with 2-year follow-up to compare the performance of decompression with and without interlaminar stabilization.
    Schmidt S; Franke J; Rauschmann M; Adelt D; Bonsanto MM; Sola S
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2018 Apr; 28(4):406-415. PubMed ID: 29372860
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. MILD® Is an Effective Treatment for Lumbar Spinal Stenosis with Neurogenic Claudication: MiDAS ENCORE Randomized Controlled Trial.
    Benyamin RM; Staats PS; MiDAS Encore I
    Pain Physician; 2016 May; 19(4):229-42. PubMed ID: 27228511
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. IPD without bony decompression versus conventional surgical decompression for lumbar spinal stenosis: 2-year results of a double-blind randomized controlled trial.
    Moojen WA; Arts MP; Jacobs WC; van Zwet EW; van den Akker-van Marle ME; Koes BW; Vleggeert-Lankamp CL; Peul WC;
    Eur Spine J; 2015 Oct; 24(10):2295-305. PubMed ID: 25586759
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Is the interspinous process device safe and effective in elderly patients with lumbar degeneration? A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
    Han B; Chen Y; Liang W; Yang Y; Ding Z; Yin P; Hai Y
    Eur Spine J; 2024 Mar; 33(3):881-891. PubMed ID: 38342843
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Interspinous Process Decompression: Expanding Treatment Options for Lumbar Spinal Stenosis.
    Nunley PD; Shamie AN; Blumenthal SL; Orndorff D; Block JE; Geisler FH
    Biomed Res Int; 2016; 2016():3267307. PubMed ID: 27819001
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Aperius interspinous implant versus open surgical decompression in lumbar spinal stenosis.
    Postacchini R; Ferrari E; Cinotti G; Menchetti PP; Postacchini F
    Spine J; 2011 Oct; 11(10):933-9. PubMed ID: 22005077
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Study of percutaneous lumbar decompression and treatment algorithm for patients suffering from neurogenic claudication.
    Deer TR; Kim CK; Bowman RG; Ranson MT; Yee BS
    Pain Physician; 2012; 15(6):451-60. PubMed ID: 23159960
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Long-term results of percutaneous lumbar decompression mild(®) for spinal stenosis.
    Mekhail N; Vallejo R; Coleman MH; Benyamin RM
    Pain Pract; 2012 Mar; 12(3):184-93. PubMed ID: 21676166
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Minimally invasive treatment of lumbar spinal stenosis with a novel interspinous spacer.
    Shabat S; Miller LE; Block JE; Gepstein R
    Clin Interv Aging; 2011; 6():227-33. PubMed ID: 21966217
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Long-Term Safety and Efficacy of Minimally Invasive Lumbar Decompression Procedure for the Treatment of Lumbar Spinal Stenosis With Neurogenic Claudication: 2-Year Results of MiDAS ENCORE.
    Staats PS; Chafin TB; Golovac S; Kim CK; Li S; Richardson WB; Vallejo R; Wahezi SE; Washabaugh EP; Benyamin RM;
    Reg Anesth Pain Med; 2018 Oct; 43(7):789-794. PubMed ID: 30199512
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Interspinous process devices(IPD) alone versus decompression surgery for lumbar spinal stenosis(LSS): A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
    Zhao XW; Ma JX; Ma XL; Li F; He WW; Jiang X; Wang Y; Han B; Lu B
    Int J Surg; 2017 Mar; 39():57-64. PubMed ID: 28110031
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Interspinous spacer decompression (X-STOP) for lumbar spinal stenosis and degenerative disk disease: a multicenter study with a minimum 3-year follow-up.
    Puzzilli F; Gazzeri R; Galarza M; Neroni M; Panagiotopoulos K; Bolognini A; Callovini G; Agrillo U; Alfieri A
    Clin Neurol Neurosurg; 2014 Sep; 124():166-74. PubMed ID: 25064150
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Five-year results of a clinical pilot study utilizing a pedicle-lengthening osteotomy for the treatment of lumbar spinal stenosis.
    Mlyavykh S; Ludwig SC; Kepler CK; Anderson DG
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2018 Sep; 29(3):241-249. PubMed ID: 29856305
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparison of the efficacy and safety between interspinous process distraction device and open decompression surgery in treating lumbar spinal stenosis: a meta analysis.
    Hong P; Liu Y; Li H
    J Invest Surg; 2015 Feb; 28(1):40-9. PubMed ID: 25025237
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Decompression of lumbar canal stenosis with a bilateral interlaminar versus classic laminectomy technique: a prospective randomized study.
    Soliman MAR; Ali A
    Neurosurg Focus; 2019 May; 46(5):E3. PubMed ID: 31042649
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Revision lumbar surgery in elderly patients with symptomatic pseudarthrosis, adjacent-segment disease, or same-level recurrent stenosis. Part 1. Two-year outcomes and clinical efficacy: clinical article.
    Adogwa O; Carr RK; Kudyba K; Karikari I; Bagley CA; Gokaslan ZL; Theodore N; Cheng JS
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2013 Feb; 18(2):139-46. PubMed ID: 23231354
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 15.