These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

181 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28919806)

  • 1. How stable are quantitative sensory testing measurements over time? Report on 10-week reliability and agreement of results in healthy volunteers.
    Nothnagel H; Puta C; Lehmann T; Baumbach P; Menard MB; Gabriel B; Gabriel HHW; Weiss T; Musial F
    J Pain Res; 2017; 10():2067-2078. PubMed ID: 28919806
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Multifactorial assessment of measurement errors affecting intraoral quantitative sensory testing reliability.
    Moana-Filho EJ; Alonso AA; Kapos FP; Leon-Salazar V; Durand SH; Hodges JS; Nixdorf DR
    Scand J Pain; 2017 Jul; 16():93-98. PubMed ID: 28850419
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Test-retest agreement and reliability of quantitative sensory testing 1 year after breast cancer surgery.
    Andersen KG; Kehlet H; Aasvang EK
    Clin J Pain; 2015 May; 31(5):393-403. PubMed ID: 25084072
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The long-term reliability of static and dynamic quantitative sensory testing in healthy individuals.
    Marcuzzi A; Wrigley PJ; Dean CM; Adams R; Hush JM
    Pain; 2017 Jul; 158(7):1217-1223. PubMed ID: 28328574
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Reproducibility of quantitative sensory testing applied to musculoskeletal orofacial region: Site and sex differences.
    Costa YM; de Araújo-Júnior ENS; Fiedler LS; de Souza PRJ; Silva LLCP; Ferreira DMAO; Conti PCR; Bonjardim LR
    Eur J Pain; 2019 Jan; 23(1):81-90. PubMed ID: 29989267
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Short-term test-retest-reliability of conditioned pain modulation using the cold-heat-pain method in healthy subjects and its correlation to parameters of standardized quantitative sensory testing.
    Gehling J; Mainka T; Vollert J; Pogatzki-Zahn EM; Maier C; Enax-Krumova EK
    BMC Neurol; 2016 Aug; 16():125. PubMed ID: 27495743
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Hand-arm vibration syndrome: clinical characteristics, conventional electrophysiology and quantitative sensory testing.
    Rolke R; Rolke S; Vogt T; Birklein F; Geber C; Treede RD; Letzel S; Voelter-Mahlknecht S
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2013 Aug; 124(8):1680-8. PubMed ID: 23507585
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Is One Trial Sufficient to Obtain Excellent Pressure Pain Threshold Reliability in the Low Back of Asymptomatic Individuals? A Test-Retest Study.
    Balaguier R; Madeleine P; Vuillerme N
    PLoS One; 2016; 11(8):e0160866. PubMed ID: 27513474
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Quantitative sensory testing in the German Research Network on Neuropathic Pain (DFNS): reference data for the trunk and application in patients with chronic postherpetic neuralgia.
    Pfau DB; Krumova EK; Treede RD; Baron R; Toelle T; Birklein F; Eich W; Geber C; Gerhardt A; Weiss T; Magerl W; Maier C
    Pain; 2014 May; 155(5):1002-1015. PubMed ID: 24525274
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Absolute and Relative Reliability of a Comprehensive Quantitative Sensory Testing Protocol in Women Treated for Breast Cancer.
    Dams L; Haenen V; Van der Gucht E; Devoogdt N; Smeets A; Bernar K; De Vrieze T; De Groef A; Meeus M
    Pain Med; 2022 May; 23(6):1162-1175. PubMed ID: 34908144
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Test-Retest and Inter-Examiner Reliability of a Novel Bedside Quantitative Sensory Testing Battery in Postherpetic Neuralgia Patients.
    Wasan AD; Alter BJ; Edwards RR; Argoff CE; Sehgal N; Walk D; Moeller-Bertram T; Wallace MS; Backonja M
    J Pain; 2020; 21(7-8):858-868. PubMed ID: 31837446
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Intra- and inter-session reliability of electrical detection and pain thresholds of cutaneous and muscle primary afferents in the lower back of healthy individuals.
    Streuli D; Nyirö L; Rosner J; Schilder A; Csato M; Schweinhardt P
    Pflugers Arch; 2023 Oct; 475(10):1211-1223. PubMed ID: 37624386
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The interrater and test-retest reliability of 3 modalities of quantitative sensory testing in healthy adults and people with chronic low back pain or rheumatoid arthritis.
    Brady SM; Georgopoulos V; Veldhuijzen van Zanten JJCS; Duda JL; Metsios GS; Kitas GD; Fenton SAM; Walsh DA; McWilliams DF
    Pain Rep; 2023 Dec; 8(6):e1102. PubMed ID: 37829138
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Test order of quantitative sensory testing facilitates mechanical hyperalgesia in healthy volunteers.
    Gröne E; Crispin A; Fleckenstein J; Irnich D; Treede RD; Lang PM
    J Pain; 2012 Jan; 13(1):73-80. PubMed ID: 22208803
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Test-retest and interobserver reliability of quantitative sensory testing according to the protocol of the German Research Network on Neuropathic Pain (DFNS): a multi-centre study.
    Geber C; Klein T; Azad S; Birklein F; Gierthmühlen J; Huge V; Lauchart M; Nitzsche D; Stengel M; Valet M; Baron R; Maier C; Tölle T; Treede RD
    Pain; 2011 Mar; 152(3):548-556. PubMed ID: 21237569
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Quantitative sensory testing of periauricular skin in healthy adults.
    Lin W; Zhou F; Yu L; Wan L; Yuan H; Wang K; Svensson P
    Sci Rep; 2020 Feb; 10(1):3728. PubMed ID: 32111937
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Reliability of intra-oral quantitative sensory testing (QST) in patients with atypical odontalgia and healthy controls - a multicentre study.
    Baad-Hansen L; Pigg M; Yang G; List T; Svensson P; Drangsholt M
    J Oral Rehabil; 2015 Feb; 42(2):127-35. PubMed ID: 25284726
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Concurrent validity of a low-cost and time-efficient clinical sensory test battery to evaluate somatosensory dysfunction.
    Zhu GC; Böttger K; Slater H; Cook C; Farrell SF; Hailey L; Tampin B; Schmid AB
    Eur J Pain; 2019 Nov; 23(10):1826-1838. PubMed ID: 31325385
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Reliability of static and dynamic quantitative sensory testing in patients with painful chronic pancreatitis.
    Olesen SS; van Goor H; Bouwense SA; Wilder-Smith OH; Drewes AM
    Reg Anesth Pain Med; 2012; 37(5):530-6. PubMed ID: 22854397
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Test-retest reliability of thermal quantitative sensory testing on two sites within the L5 dermatome of the lumbar spine and lower extremity.
    Knutti IA; Suter MR; Opsommer E
    Neurosci Lett; 2014 Sep; 579():157-62. PubMed ID: 25064700
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.