253 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28920504)
21. Induction of twin pregnancy and the risk of caesarean delivery: a cohort study.
Jonsson M
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth; 2015 Jun; 15():136. PubMed ID: 26077416
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Outpatient balloon catheter vs inpatient prostaglandin for induction of labor: a randomized trial.
Wise MR; Thompson JMD; Battin M; McDougall J; Wilson J; Marriott J; Stitely M; Sadler L
Am J Obstet Gynecol MFM; 2023 Jun; 5(6):100958. PubMed ID: 37028554
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. [Cervical ripening and labor induction].
Tardif D; Dessolle L; Madelenat P
Rev Prat; 1999 Jan; 49(2):146-50. PubMed ID: 9989149
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Comparison of prostaglandin and mechanical cervical ripening in the setting of small for gestational age neonates.
Rossi RM; Warshak CR; Masters HR; Regan JK; Kritzer SA; Magner KP
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2019 Nov; 32(22):3841-3846. PubMed ID: 29739262
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
25. Induction of labour in nulliparous and multiparous women: a UK, multicentre, open-label study of intravaginal misoprostol in comparison with dinoprostone.
Calder AA; Loughney AD; Weir CJ; Barber JW
BJOG; 2008 Sep; 115(10):1279-88. PubMed ID: 18715414
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Risk of maternal, fetal and neonatal complications associated with the use of the transcervical balloon catheter in induction of labour: A systematic review.
Gommers JSM; Diederen M; Wilkinson C; Turnbull D; Mol BWJ
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2017 Nov; 218():73-84. PubMed ID: 28963922
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Outpatient cervical ripening.
Amorosa JM; Stone JL
Semin Perinatol; 2015 Oct; 39(6):488-94. PubMed ID: 26365009
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Foley catheter versus vaginal prostaglandin E2 gel for induction of labour at term (PROBAAT trial): an open-label, randomised controlled trial.
Jozwiak M; Oude Rengerink K; Benthem M; van Beek E; Dijksterhuis MG; de Graaf IM; van Huizen ME; Oudijk MA; Papatsonis DN; Perquin DA; Porath M; van der Post JA; Rijnders RJ; Scheepers HC; Spaanderman ME; van Pampus MG; de Leeuw JW; Mol BW; Bloemenkamp KW;
Lancet; 2011 Dec; 378(9809):2095-103. PubMed ID: 22030144
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Outpatient management of pre-induction cervical ripening.
Chen V; Sheehan P
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2022 Aug; 35(15):2954-2960. PubMed ID: 32847436
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. A safety review of medications used for labour induction.
Sheibani L; Wing DA
Expert Opin Drug Saf; 2018 Feb; 17(2):161-167. PubMed ID: 29141462
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Induction of labour using prostaglandin E
Beckmann M; Gibbons K; Flenady V; Kumar S
BJOG; 2020 Apr; 127(5):571-579. PubMed ID: 31785056
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Cervical ripening as an outpatient procedure in the pandemic - minimizing the inpatient days and lowering the socioeconomic costs.
Kummer J; Koenigbauer JT; Callister Y; Pech L; Rath W; Wegener S; Hellmeyer L
J Perinat Med; 2022 Nov; 50(9):1180-1188. PubMed ID: 35942570
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Outpatient vs inpatient induction of labor with oral misoprostol: A retrospective study.
Hallén N; Amini M; Wide-Swensson D; Herbst A
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2023 May; 102(5):605-611. PubMed ID: 36965000
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. [Cervical ripening after previous cesarean section with dinoprostone vaginal insert].
Coste Mazeau P; Catalan C; Eyraud JL; Aubard Y; Gauthier T
Gynecol Obstet Fertil Senol; 2017 Feb; 45(2):77-82. PubMed ID: 28368799
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Pre-induction cervical ripening: transcervical foley catheter versus intravaginal misoprostol.
Adeniji OA; Oladokun A; Olayemi O; Adeniji OI; Odukogbe AA; Ogunbode O; Aimakhu CO; Omigbodun AO; Ilesanmi AO
J Obstet Gynaecol; 2005 Feb; 25(2):134-9. PubMed ID: 15814391
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Pre-induction cervical ripening: comparing between two vaginal preparations of dinoprostone in women with an unfavorable cervix.
Ashwal E; Hiersch L; Melamed N; Manor Y; Wiznitzer A; Hod M; Yogev Y
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2014 Dec; 27(18):1874-9. PubMed ID: 24417462
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Foley catheter induction of labor as an outpatient procedure.
Kruit H; Heikinheimo O; Ulander VM; Aitokallio-Tallberg A; Nupponen I; Paavonen J; Rahkonen L
J Perinatol; 2016 Aug; 36(8):618-22. PubMed ID: 27078202
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Outpatient induction -- how safe.
Rath WH
J Perinat Med; 2009; 37(5):461-7. PubMed ID: 19492924
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Double-balloon catheter versus prostaglandin for cervical ripening to induce labor after previous cesarean delivery.
Korb D; Renard S; Morin C; Merviel P; Sibony O
Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2020 Apr; 301(4):931-940. PubMed ID: 32140810
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. A randomised open-label trial to assess outpatient induction of labour (HOMEIND) and compare efficacy of Propess vs Dilapan-S® for induction of labour at 39 weeks' gestation in normal risk nulliparous women: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial.
Nicholson SM; Smith O; Hatt S; Molphy Z; Dicker P; Flood K; Malone F
Trials; 2023 Feb; 24(1):135. PubMed ID: 36814336
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
