111 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28920794)
1. INTRAOCULAR PRESSURE AND EXAMINATION FINDINGS IN THREE SPECIES OF CENTRAL AND SOUTH AMERICAN TREE FROGS (CRUZIOHYLA CRASPEDOPUS, CRUZIOHYLA CALCARIFER, AND ANOTHECA SPINOSA).
Lewin AC; Hausmann JC; Miller PE
J Zoo Wildl Med; 2017 Sep; 48(3):688-693. PubMed ID: 28920794
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. MEASURING INTRAOCULAR PRESSURE IN WHITE'S TREE FROGS (LITORIA CAERULEA) BY REBOUND TONOMETRY: COMPARING DEVICE, TIME OF DAY, AND MANUAL VERSUS CHEMICAL RESTRAINT METHODS.
Hausmann JC; Krisp A; Sladky K; Miller PE; Mans C
J Zoo Wildl Med; 2017 Jun; 48(2):413-419. PubMed ID: 28749263
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. OPHTHALMIC EXAMINATION FINDINGS AND INTRAOCULAR PRESSURE MEASUREMENTS IN SIX SPECIES OF ANURA.
Hausmann JC; Weaver TJ; Freeman KS
J Zoo Wildl Med; 2020 Jan; 50(4):845-852. PubMed ID: 31926514
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Tonometer validation and intraocular pressure reference values in the normal chinchilla (Chinchilla lanigera).
Snyder KC; Lewin AC; Mans C; McLellan GJ
Vet Ophthalmol; 2018 Jan; 21(1):4-9. PubMed ID: 28303681
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Evaluation of rebound tonometry in red-eared slider turtles (Trachemys scripta elegans).
Delgado C; Mans C; McLellan GJ; Bentley E; Sladky KK; Miller PE
Vet Ophthalmol; 2014 Jul; 17(4):261-7. PubMed ID: 25097909
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Review of the genus Cruziohyla (Anura: Phyllomedusidae), with description of a new species.
Gray AR
Zootaxa; 2018 Jul; 4450(4):401-426. PubMed ID: 30313830
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Clinical comparison of the TonoVet(®) rebound tonometer and the Tono-Pen Vet(®) applanation tonometer in dogs and cats with ocular disease: glaucoma or corneal pathology.
von Spiessen L; Karck J; Rohn K; Meyer-Lindenberg A
Vet Ophthalmol; 2015 Jan; 18(1):20-7. PubMed ID: 24131625
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparison of the rebound tonometer (TonoVet) with the applanation tonometer (TonoPen XL) in normal Eurasian Eagle owls (Bubo bubo).
Jeong MB; Kim YJ; Yi NY; Park SA; Kim WT; Kim SE; Chae JM; Kim JT; Lee H; Seo KM
Vet Ophthalmol; 2007; 10(6):376-9. PubMed ID: 17970999
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparison of intraocular pressure measurements using rebound (TonoVet
McDonald JE; Knollinger AM; Dustin Dees D; MacLaren NE
Vet Ophthalmol; 2017 Mar; 20(2):155-159. PubMed ID: 27111099
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison of a rebound and an applanation tonometer for measuring intraocular pressure in normal rabbits.
Pereira FQ; Bercht BS; Soares MG; da Mota MG; Pigatto JA
Vet Ophthalmol; 2011 Sep; 14(5):321-6. PubMed ID: 21929609
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Repeatability, reproducibility, and agreement of three tonometers for measuring intraocular pressure in rabbits.
Bertens CJF; van Mechelen RJS; Berendschot TTJM; Gijs M; Wolters JEJ; Gorgels TGMF; Nuijts RMMA; Beckers HJM
Sci Rep; 2021 Sep; 11(1):19217. PubMed ID: 34584185
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Intraocular pressure in American Bullfrogs (Rana catesbeiana) measured with rebound and applanation tonometry.
Cannizzo SA; Lewbart GA; Westermeyer HD
Vet Ophthalmol; 2017 Nov; 20(6):526-532. PubMed ID: 28247466
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Intraocular pressure measurements in cattle, sheep, and goats with 2 different types of tonometers.
Peche N; Eule JC
Can J Vet Res; 2018 Jul; 82(3):208-215. PubMed ID: 30026646
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison of Tonovet® and Tonovet plus® tonometers for measuring intraocular pressure in dogs, cats, horses, cattle, and sheep.
Kovalcuka L; Mālniece A; Vanaga J
Vet World; 2024 Feb; 17(2):384-388. PubMed ID: 38595645
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Validation of rebound tonometry for intraocular pressure measurement in the rabbit.
Zhang H; Yang D; Ross CM; Wigg JP; Pandav S; Crowston JG
Exp Eye Res; 2014 Apr; 121():86-93. PubMed ID: 24561115
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Accuracy and reproducibility of the TonoVet rebound tonometer in birds of prey.
Reuter A; Müller K; Arndt G; Eule JC
Vet Ophthalmol; 2010 Sep; 13 Suppl():80-5. PubMed ID: 20840094
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparison of two rebound tonometers in healthy horses.
Mustikka MP; Pietilä EM; Mykkänen AK; Grönthal TSC
Vet Ophthalmol; 2020 Sep; 23(5):892-898. PubMed ID: 32888242
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Accuracy of intraocular pressure measurements in dogs using two different tonometers and plano therapeutic soft contact lenses.
Ahn JT; Jeong MB; Park YW; Kim SE; Ahn JS; Lee YR; Lee ER; Seo K
Vet Ophthalmol; 2012 Mar; 15 Suppl 1():83-8. PubMed ID: 22192568
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. [Clinical evaluation of the Tonovet® reboundtonometer in dogs and cats considering potential errors in handling].
von Spiessen L; Karck J; Rohn K; Meyer-Lindenberg A
Tierarztl Prax Ausg K Kleintiere Heimtiere; 2013; 41(4):213-20. PubMed ID: 23958704
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Calibration of the TonoVet and Tono-Pen Vet tonometers in the porcine eye.
Lewin AC; Miller PE
Vet Ophthalmol; 2017 Nov; 20(6):571-573. PubMed ID: 27882675
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
