1185 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28921802)
1. Environmental DNA metabarcoding: Transforming how we survey animal and plant communities.
Deiner K; Bik HM; Mächler E; Seymour M; Lacoursière-Roussel A; Altermatt F; Creer S; Bista I; Lodge DM; de Vere N; Pfrender ME; Bernatchez L
Mol Ecol; 2017 Nov; 26(21):5872-5895. PubMed ID: 28921802
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparison of environmental DNA and bulk-sample metabarcoding using highly degenerate cytochrome c oxidase I primers.
Macher JN; Vivancos A; Piggott JJ; Centeno FC; Matthaei CD; Leese F
Mol Ecol Resour; 2018 Nov; 18(6):1456-1468. PubMed ID: 30129704
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Next-generation monitoring of aquatic biodiversity using environmental DNA metabarcoding.
Valentini A; Taberlet P; Miaud C; Civade R; Herder J; Thomsen PF; Bellemain E; Besnard A; Coissac E; Boyer F; Gaboriaud C; Jean P; Poulet N; Roset N; Copp GH; Geniez P; Pont D; Argillier C; Baudoin JM; Peroux T; Crivelli AJ; Olivier A; Acqueberge M; Le Brun M; Møller PR; Willerslev E; Dejean T
Mol Ecol; 2016 Feb; 25(4):929-42. PubMed ID: 26479867
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Environmental DNA metabarcoding for fish community analysis in backwater lakes: A comparison of capture methods.
Fujii K; Doi H; Matsuoka S; Nagano M; Sato H; Yamanaka H
PLoS One; 2019; 14(1):e0210357. PubMed ID: 30703107
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. eDNA metabarcoding as a promising conservation tool for monitoring fish diversity in a coastal wetland of the Pearl River Estuary compared to bottom trawling.
Zou K; Chen J; Ruan H; Li Z; Guo W; Li M; Liu L
Sci Total Environ; 2020 Feb; 702():134704. PubMed ID: 31726353
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Environmental DNA metabarcoding of lake fish communities reflects long-term data from established survey methods.
Hänfling B; Lawson Handley L; Read DS; Hahn C; Li J; Nichols P; Blackman RC; Oliver A; Winfield IJ
Mol Ecol; 2016 Jul; 25(13):3101-19. PubMed ID: 27095076
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Measuring global fish species richness with eDNA metabarcoding.
Jerde CL; Wilson EA; Dressler TL
Mol Ecol Resour; 2019 Jan; 19(1):19-22. PubMed ID: 30701707
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Taxonomic accuracy and complementarity between bulk and eDNA metabarcoding provides an alternative to morphology for biological assessment of freshwater macroinvertebrates.
Múrria C; Wangensteen OS; Somma S; Väisänen L; Fortuño P; Arnedo MA; Prat N
Sci Total Environ; 2024 Jul; 935():173243. PubMed ID: 38761946
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Predicting the Ecological Quality Status of Marine Environments from eDNA Metabarcoding Data Using Supervised Machine Learning.
Cordier T; Esling P; Lejzerowicz F; Visco J; Ouadahi A; Martins C; Cedhagen T; Pawlowski J
Environ Sci Technol; 2017 Aug; 51(16):9118-9126. PubMed ID: 28665601
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A manager's guide to using eDNA metabarcoding in marine ecosystems.
Gold Z; Wall AR; Schweizer TM; Pentcheff ND; Curd EE; Barber PH; Meyer RS; Wayne R; Stolzenbach K; Prickett K; Luedy J; Wetzer R
PeerJ; 2022; 10():e14071. PubMed ID: 36405018
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Bioinformatic challenges for DNA metabarcoding of plants and animals.
Coissac E; Riaz T; Puillandre N
Mol Ecol; 2012 Apr; 21(8):1834-47. PubMed ID: 22486822
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Quantification of mesocosm fish and amphibian species diversity via environmental DNA metabarcoding.
Evans NT; Olds BP; Renshaw MA; Turner CR; Li Y; Jerde CL; Mahon AR; Pfrender ME; Lamberti GA; Lodge DM
Mol Ecol Resour; 2016 Jan; 16(1):29-41. PubMed ID: 26032773
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Multi-marker eDNA metabarcoding survey to assess the environmental impact of three offshore gas platforms in the North Adriatic Sea (Italy).
Cordier T; Frontalini F; Cermakova K; Apothéloz-Perret-Gentil L; Treglia M; Scantamburlo E; Bonamin V; Pawlowski J
Mar Environ Res; 2019 Apr; 146():24-34. PubMed ID: 30890270
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Environmental DNA metabarcoding of freshwater fish in Malaysian tropical rivers using short-read nanopore sequencing as a potential biomonitoring tool.
Munian K; Ramli FF; Othman N; Mahyudin NAA; Sariyati NH; Abdullah-Fauzi NAF; Haris H; Ilham-Norhakim ML; Abdul-Latiff MAB
Mol Ecol Resour; 2024 May; 24(4):e13936. PubMed ID: 38419264
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Environmental DNA Metabarcoding: A Novel Method for Biodiversity Monitoring of Marine Fish Communities.
Miya M
Ann Rev Mar Sci; 2022 Jan; 14():161-185. PubMed ID: 34351788
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Environmental DNA metabarcoding studies are critically affected by substrate selection.
Koziol A; Stat M; Simpson T; Jarman S; DiBattista JD; Harvey ES; Marnane M; McDonald J; Bunce M
Mol Ecol Resour; 2019 Mar; 19(2):366-376. PubMed ID: 30485662
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Environmental DNA metabarcoding reveals local fish communities in a species-rich coastal sea.
Yamamoto S; Masuda R; Sato Y; Sado T; Araki H; Kondoh M; Minamoto T; Miya M
Sci Rep; 2017 Jan; 7():40368. PubMed ID: 28079122
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Spatial Representativeness of Environmental DNA Metabarcoding Signal for Fish Biodiversity Assessment in a Natural Freshwater System.
Civade R; Dejean T; Valentini A; Roset N; Raymond JC; Bonin A; Taberlet P; Pont D
PLoS One; 2016; 11(6):e0157366. PubMed ID: 27359116
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Environmental DNA from Marine Waters and Substrates: Protocols for Sampling and eDNA Extraction.
Cowart DA; Murphy KR; Cheng CC
Methods Mol Biol; 2022; 2498():225-251. PubMed ID: 35727547
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Quantitative environmental DNA metabarcoding shows high potential as a novel approach to quantitatively assess fish community.
Tsuji S; Inui R; Nakao R; Miyazono S; Saito M; Kono T; Akamatsu Y
Sci Rep; 2022 Dec; 12(1):21524. PubMed ID: 36513686
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
