These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
429 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28921850)
1. Prospective comparison of transperineal magnetic resonance imaging/ultrasonography fusion biopsy and transrectal systematic biopsy in biopsy-naïve patients. Borkowetz A; Hadaschik B; Platzek I; Toma M; Torsev G; Renner T; Herout R; Baunacke M; Laniado M; Baretton G; Radtke JP; Kesch C; Hohenfellner M; Froehner M; Schlemmer HP; Wirth M; Zastrow S BJU Int; 2018 Jan; 121(1):53-60. PubMed ID: 28921850 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Evaluation of Magnetic Resonance Imaging/Ultrasound-Fusion Biopsy in Patients with Low-Risk Prostate Cancer Under Active Surveillance Undergoing Surveillance Biopsy. Borkowetz A; Renner T; Platzek I; Toma M; Herout R; Baunacke M; Groeben C; Huber J; Laniado M; Baretton GB; Froehner M; Zastrow S; Wirth MP Urol Int; 2018; 100(2):155-163. PubMed ID: 29339663 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Evaluation of Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System Classification in the Prediction of Tumor Aggressiveness in Targeted Magnetic Resonance Imaging/Ultrasound-Fusion Biopsy. Borkowetz A; Platzek I; Toma M; Renner T; Herout R; Baunacke M; Laniado M; Baretton GB; Froehner M; Zastrow S; Wirth MP Urol Int; 2017; 99(2):177-185. PubMed ID: 28531902 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Evaluation of Transperineal Magnetic Resonance Imaging/Ultrasound-Fusion Biopsy Compared to Transrectal Systematic Biopsy in the Prediction of Tumour Aggressiveness in Patients with Previously Negative Biopsy. Borkowetz A; Renner T; Platzek I; Toma M; Herout R; Baunacke M; Groeben C; Huber J; Laniado M; Baretton G; Froehner M; Zastrow S; Wirth MP Urol Int; 2019; 102(1):20-26. PubMed ID: 30149386 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Value of three biopsy methods in prostate cancer detection: a meta-analysis and systematic review. Deng YS; He YH; Ying WW; Liu HL; Li PZ; Ma CY; Ding ZS; Chen X; Wang JF; Zhou XF Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci; 2021 Mar; 25(5):2221-2234. PubMed ID: 33755960 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Prostate Cancer Risk Assessment in Biopsy-naïve Patients: The Rotterdam Prostate Cancer Risk Calculator in Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging-Transrectal Ultrasound (TRUS) Fusion Biopsy and Systematic TRUS Biopsy. Mannaerts CK; Gayet M; Verbeek JF; Engelbrecht MRW; Savci-Heijink CD; Jager GJ; Gielens MPM; van der Linden H; Beerlage HP; de Reijke TM; Wijkstra H; Roobol MJ Eur Urol Oncol; 2018 Jun; 1(2):109-117. PubMed ID: 31100233 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison between target magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in-gantry and cognitively directed transperineal or transrectal-guided prostate biopsies for Prostate Imaging-Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS) 3-5 MRI lesions. Yaxley AJ; Yaxley JW; Thangasamy IA; Ballard E; Pokorny MR BJU Int; 2017 Nov; 120 Suppl 3():43-50. PubMed ID: 28749035 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Assessment of free-hand transperineal targeted prostate biopsy using multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging-transrectal ultrasound fusion in Chinese men with prior negative biopsy and elevated prostate-specific antigen. Lian H; Zhuang J; Wang W; Zhang B; Shi J; Li D; Fu Y; Jiang X; Zhou W; Guo H BMC Urol; 2017 Jul; 17(1):52. PubMed ID: 28679370 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Multicentre evaluation of magnetic resonance imaging supported transperineal prostate biopsy in biopsy-naïve men with suspicion of prostate cancer. Hansen NL; Barrett T; Kesch C; Pepdjonovic L; Bonekamp D; O'Sullivan R; Distler F; Warren A; Samel C; Hadaschik B; Grummet J; Kastner C BJU Int; 2018 Jul; 122(1):40-49. PubMed ID: 29024425 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparative analysis of transperineal template saturation prostate biopsy versus magnetic resonance imaging targeted biopsy with magnetic resonance imaging-ultrasound fusion guidance. Radtke JP; Kuru TH; Boxler S; Alt CD; Popeneciu IV; Huettenbrink C; Klein T; Steinemann S; Bergstraesser C; Roethke M; Roth W; Schlemmer HP; Hohenfellner M; Hadaschik BA J Urol; 2015 Jan; 193(1):87-94. PubMed ID: 25079939 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [Real-time MRI/US fusion-guided biopsy in biopsy-naïve and pre-biopsied patients with suspicion for prostate cancer]. Maxeiner A; Stephan C; Fischer T; Durmus T; Kilic E; Asbach P; Haas M; Günzel K; Neymeyer J; Miller K; Cash H Aktuelle Urol; 2015 Jan; 46(1):34-8. PubMed ID: 25519051 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Prostate cancer detection rate in men undergoing transperineal template-guided saturation and targeted prostate biopsy. Kaufmann B; Saba K; Schmidli TS; Stutz S; Bissig L; Britschgi AJ; Schaeren E; Gu A; Langenegger N; Sulser T; Eberli D; Keller EX; Hermanns T; Poyet C Prostate; 2022 Feb; 82(3):388-396. PubMed ID: 34914121 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Multicentre evaluation of targeted and systematic biopsies using magnetic resonance and ultrasound image-fusion guided transperineal prostate biopsy in patients with a previous negative biopsy. Hansen NL; Kesch C; Barrett T; Koo B; Radtke JP; Bonekamp D; Schlemmer HP; Warren AY; Wieczorek K; Hohenfellner M; Kastner C; Hadaschik B BJU Int; 2017 Nov; 120(5):631-638. PubMed ID: 27862869 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Is targeted magnetic resonance imaging/transrectal ultrasound fusion prostate biopsy enough for the detection of prostate cancer in patients with PI-RADS ≥3: Results of a prospective, randomized clinical trial. Zhang J; Zhu A; Sun D; Guo S; Zhang H; Liu S; Fu Q; Zhang K J Cancer Res Ther; 2020; 16(7):1698-1702. PubMed ID: 33565519 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Head-to-head Comparison of Transrectal Ultrasound-guided Prostate Biopsy Versus Multiparametric Prostate Resonance Imaging with Subsequent Magnetic Resonance-guided Biopsy in Biopsy-naïve Men with Elevated Prostate-specific Antigen: A Large Prospective Multicenter Clinical Study. van der Leest M; Cornel E; Israël B; Hendriks R; Padhani AR; Hoogenboom M; Zamecnik P; Bakker D; Setiasti AY; Veltman J; van den Hout H; van der Lelij H; van Oort I; Klaver S; Debruyne F; Sedelaar M; Hannink G; Rovers M; Hulsbergen-van de Kaa C; Barentsz JO Eur Urol; 2019 Apr; 75(4):570-578. PubMed ID: 30477981 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Primary magnetic resonance imaging/ultrasonography fusion-guided biopsy of the prostate. Maxeiner A; Kittner B; Blobel C; Wiemer L; Hofbauer SL; Fischer T; Asbach P; Haas M; Penzkofer T; Fuller F; Miller K; Cash H BJU Int; 2018 Aug; 122(2):211-218. PubMed ID: 29569320 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Not All Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging-targeted Biopsies Are Equal: The Impact of the Type of Approach and Operator Expertise on the Detection of Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer. Stabile A; Dell'Oglio P; Gandaglia G; Fossati N; Brembilla G; Cristel G; Dehò F; Scattoni V; Maga T; Losa A; Gaboardi F; Cardone G; Esposito A; De Cobelli F; Del Maschio A; Montorsi F; Briganti A Eur Urol Oncol; 2018 Jun; 1(2):120-128. PubMed ID: 31100235 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparison of systematic transrectal biopsy to transperineal magnetic resonance imaging/ultrasound-fusion biopsy for the diagnosis of prostate cancer. Borkowetz A; Platzek I; Toma M; Laniado M; Baretton G; Froehner M; Koch R; Wirth M; Zastrow S BJU Int; 2015 Dec; 116(6):873-9. PubMed ID: 25523210 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A cohort of transperineal electromagnetically tracked magnetic resonance imaging/ultrasonography fusion-guided biopsy: assessing the impact of inter-reader variability on cancer detection. Wajswol E; Winoker JS; Anastos H; Falagario U; Okhawere K; Martini A; Treacy PJ; Voutsinas N; Knauer CJ; Sfakianos JP; Lewis SC; Taouli BA; Rastinehad AR BJU Int; 2020 Apr; 125(4):531-540. PubMed ID: 31762182 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]