183 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28921876)
1. Validation of artificial neural networks as a methodology for donor-recipient matching for liver transplantation.
Ayllón MD; Ciria R; Cruz-Ramírez M; Pérez-Ortiz M; Gómez I; Valente R; O'Grady J; de la Mata M; Hervás-Martínez C; Heaton ND; Briceño J
Liver Transpl; 2018 Feb; 24(2):192-203. PubMed ID: 28921876
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Use of artificial intelligence as an innovative donor-recipient matching model for liver transplantation: results from a multicenter Spanish study.
Briceño J; Cruz-Ramírez M; Prieto M; Navasa M; Ortiz de Urbina J; Orti R; Gómez-Bravo MÁ; Otero A; Varo E; Tomé S; Clemente G; Bañares R; Bárcena R; Cuervas-Mons V; Solórzano G; Vinaixa C; Rubín A; Colmenero J; Valdivieso A; Ciria R; Hervás-Martínez C; de la Mata M
J Hepatol; 2014 Nov; 61(5):1020-8. PubMed ID: 24905493
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Donor-Model for End-Stage Liver Disease and donor-recipient matching in liver transplantation.
Vitale A; Ramirez Morales R; dalla Bona E; Scopelliti M; Zanus G; Neri D; d'Amico F; Gringeri E; Russo F; Burra P; Angeli P; Cillo U
Transplant Proc; 2011 May; 43(4):974-6. PubMed ID: 21620029
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Predicting patient survival after liver transplantation using evolutionary multi-objective artificial neural networks.
Cruz-Ramírez M; Hervás-Martínez C; Fernández JC; Briceño J; de la Mata M
Artif Intell Med; 2013 May; 58(1):37-49. PubMed ID: 23489761
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Machine-Learning Algorithms Predict Graft Failure After Liver Transplantation.
Lau L; Kankanige Y; Rubinstein B; Jones R; Christophi C; Muralidharan V; Bailey J
Transplantation; 2017 Apr; 101(4):e125-e132. PubMed ID: 27941428
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The postoperative Model for End stage Liver Disease score as a predictor of short-term outcome after transplantation of extended criteria donor livers.
Benko T; Gallinat A; Minor T; Saner FH; Sotiropoulos GC; Paul A; Hoyer DP
Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2017 Jun; 29(6):716-722. PubMed ID: 28441690
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Artificial neural network is superior to MELD in predicting mortality of patients with end-stage liver disease.
Cucchetti A; Vivarelli M; Heaton ND; Phillips S; Piscaglia F; Bolondi L; La Barba G; Foxton MR; Rela M; O'Grady J; Pinna AD
Gut; 2007 Feb; 56(2):253-8. PubMed ID: 16809421
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Dynamically weighted evolutionary ordinal neural network for solving an imbalanced liver transplantation problem.
Dorado-Moreno M; Pérez-Ortiz M; Gutiérrez PA; Ciria R; Briceño J; Hervás-Martínez C
Artif Intell Med; 2017 Mar; 77():1-11. PubMed ID: 28545607
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Graft Risk Index After Liver Transplant: Internal and External Validation of a New Spanish Indicator.
Araiz Burdio JJ; Ocabo Buil P; Lacruz Lopez E; Diaz Mele MC; Rodríguez García A; Pascual Bielsa A; Zalba Etayo B; Virgós Señor B; Marin Araiz L; Suárez Pinilla MÁ
Exp Clin Transplant; 2019 Dec; 17(6):784-791. PubMed ID: 31084588
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Donation: Where are our opportunities for expansion?
Guarrera JV
Liver Transpl; 2014 Nov; 20 Suppl 2():S2-4. PubMed ID: 25220934
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Potential catalysts in postoperative management/critical care.
Diaz G
Liver Transpl; 2014 Nov; 20 Suppl 2():S16-8. PubMed ID: 25212664
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Opportunities for scientific expansion of the deceased donor pool.
Matton AP; Porte RJ
Liver Transpl; 2014 Nov; 20 Suppl 2():S5. PubMed ID: 25219379
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Machine-learning algorithms for predicting results in liver transplantation: the problem of donor-recipient matching.
Briceño J; Ayllón MD; Ciria R
Curr Opin Organ Transplant; 2020 Aug; 25(4):406-411. PubMed ID: 32487891
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A bridge too far: We have not overstepped the line for extended deceased donors.
Fondevila C
Liver Transpl; 2014 Nov; 20 Suppl 2():S9-13. PubMed ID: 25220866
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. A bridge too far: We have overstepped the line for extended deceased donors.
Pinna AD; Neri F; Ravaioli M
Liver Transpl; 2014 Nov; 20 Suppl 2():S6-8. PubMed ID: 25219495
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Results of liver transplants from donors aged 70 plus: analysis of Andalusian transplant register.
Franco CC; Martínez JM; Bellido CB; Artacho GS; Gómez LM; Diez-Canedo JS; Aunión CD; Ruiz FJ; Bravo MA
Transplant Proc; 2013; 45(10):3647-9. PubMed ID: 24314984
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Donor and recipient factors predicting time to graft failure following orthotopic liver transplantation: a transplant risk index.
Stey AM; Doucette J; Florman S; Emre S
Transplant Proc; 2013; 45(6):2077-82. PubMed ID: 23953516
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Artificial intelligence and liver transplantation: Looking for the best donor-recipient pairing.
Briceño J; Calleja R; Hervás C
Hepatobiliary Pancreat Dis Int; 2022 Aug; 21(4):347-353. PubMed ID: 35321836
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Donor assessment scores: relevance and complete irrelevance.
Porrett PM; ter Horst M; Shaked A
Liver Transpl; 2012 Nov; 18 Suppl 2():S25-30. PubMed ID: 22767426
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Use of a liver from donor after cardiac death: is it appropriate for the sick or the stable?
Dubbeld J; van Hoek B; Ringers J
Curr Opin Organ Transplant; 2011 Apr; 16(2):239-42. PubMed ID: 21415827
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
