BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

278 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28921999)

  • 1. Predictive validity and adjustment of ideal partner preferences across the transition into romantic relationships.
    Gerlach TM; Arslan RC; Schultze T; Reinhard SK; Penke L
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 2019 Feb; 116(2):313-330. PubMed ID: 28921999
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Self-Rated Attractiveness Moderates the Relationship Between Dark Personality Traits and Romantic Ideals in Women.
    Birkás B; Láng A; Meskó N
    Psychol Rep; 2018 Feb; 121(1):184-200. PubMed ID: 29298572
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Implicit and explicit preferences for physical attractiveness in a romantic partner: a double dissociation in predictive validity.
    Eastwick PW; Eagly AH; Finkel EJ; Johnson SE
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 2011 Nov; 101(5):993-1011. PubMed ID: 21767032
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Individual differences in preference for risky behaviors during courtship.
    Prokop P; Pazda A
    Scand J Psychol; 2020 Aug; 61(4):560-564. PubMed ID: 32103513
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. When and why do ideal partner preferences affect the process of initiating and maintaining romantic relationships?
    Eastwick PW; Finkel EJ; Eagly AH
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 2011 Nov; 101(5):1012-32. PubMed ID: 21707198
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Self-Perceived Mate Value, Facial Attractiveness, and Mate Preferences: Do Desirable Men Want It All?
    Arnocky S
    Evol Psychol; 2018; 16(1):1474704918763271. PubMed ID: 29534596
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Sex differences in mate preferences revisited: do people know what they initially desire in a romantic partner?
    Eastwick PW; Finkel EJ
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 2008 Feb; 94(2):245-64. PubMed ID: 18211175
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Netflix and Chill? What Sex Differences Can Tell Us About Mate Preferences in (Hypothetical) Booty-Call Relationships.
    March E; Van Doorn G; Grieve R
    Evol Psychol; 2018; 16(4):1474704918812138. PubMed ID: 30428700
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Sociosexual attitudes and dyadic sexual desire independently predict women's preferences for male vocal masculinity.
    O'Connor JJ; Jones BC; Fraccaro PJ; Tigue CC; Pisanski K; Feinberg DR
    Arch Sex Behav; 2014 Oct; 43(7):1343-53. PubMed ID: 24830906
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The predictive validity of ideal partner preferences: a review and meta-analysis.
    Eastwick PW; Luchies LB; Finkel EJ; Hunt LL
    Psychol Bull; 2014 May; 140(3):623-665. PubMed ID: 23586697
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Euclidean Mate Value and Power of Choice on the Mating Market.
    Conroy-Beam D
    Pers Soc Psychol Bull; 2018 Feb; 44(2):252-264. PubMed ID: 29082804
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Mate Preferences for Warmth-Trustworthiness Predict Romantic Attraction in the Early Stages of Mate Selection and Satisfaction in Ongoing Relationships.
    Valentine KA; Li NP; Meltzer AL; Tsai MH
    Pers Soc Psychol Bull; 2020 Feb; 46(2):298-311. PubMed ID: 31184259
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Consistency between individuals' past and current romantic partners' own reports of their personalities.
    Park Y; MacDonald G
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2019 Jun; 116(26):12793-12797. PubMed ID: 31182593
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Intra-sex Variation in Human Mating Strategies: Different People, Different Tactics.
    Castro FN; Hattori WT; de Araújo Lopes F
    Arch Sex Behav; 2015 Aug; 44(6):1729-36. PubMed ID: 25896490
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Body ideals for heterosexual romantic partners: gender and sociocultural influences.
    Murnen SK; Poinsatte K; Huntsman K; Goldfarb J; Glaser D
    Body Image; 2015 Jan; 12():22-31. PubMed ID: 25462878
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Contrasting Computational Models of Mate Preference Integration Across 45 Countries.
    Conroy-Beam D; Buss DM; Asao K; Sorokowska A; Sorokowski P; Aavik T; Akello G; Alhabahba MM; Alm C; Amjad N; Anjum A; Atama CS; Duyar DA; Ayebare R; Batres C; Bendixen M; Bensafia A; Bizumic B; Boussena M; Butovskaya M; Can S; Cantarero K; Carrier A; Cetinkaya H; Croy I; Cueto RM; Czub M; Dronova D; Dural S; Duyar I; Ertugrul B; Espinosa A; Estevan I; Esteves CS; Fang L; Frackowiak T; Garduño JC; González KU; Guemaz F; Gyuris P; Halamová M; Herak I; Horvat M; Hromatko I; Hui CM; Jaafar JL; Jiang F; Kafetsios K; Kavčič T; Kennair LEO; Kervyn N; Thi Khanh Ha T; Khilji IA; Köbis NC; Lan HM; Láng A; Lennard GR; León E; Lindholm T; Thi Linh T; Lopez G; Van Luot N; Mailhos A; Manesi Z; Martinez R; McKerchar SL; Meskó N; Misra G; Monaghan C; Mora EC; Moya-Garófano A; Musil B; Natividade JC; Niemczyk A; Nizharadze G; Oberzaucher E; Oleszkiewicz A; Omar-Fauzee MS; Onyishi IE; Özener B; Pagani AF; Pakalniskiene V; Parise M; Pazhoohi F; Pisanski A; Pisanski K; Ponciano E; Popa C; Prokop P; Rizwan M; Sainz M; Salkičević S; Sargautyte R; Sarmány-Schuller I; Schmehl S; Sharad S; Siddiqui RS; Simonetti F; Stoyanova SY; Tadinac M; Varella MAC; Vauclair CM; Vega LD; Widarini DA; Yoo G; Zaťková M; Zupančič M
    Sci Rep; 2019 Nov; 9(1):16885. PubMed ID: 31729413
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Changes in women's feelings about their romantic relationships across the ovulatory cycle.
    Larson CM; Haselton MG; Gildersleeve KA; Pillsworth EG
    Horm Behav; 2013 Jan; 63(1):128-35. PubMed ID: 23085495
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Homosexual mating preferences from an evolutionary perspective: sexual selection theory revisited.
    Gobrogge KL; Perkins PS; Baker JH; Balcer KD; Breedlove SM; Klump KL
    Arch Sex Behav; 2007 Oct; 36(5):717-23. PubMed ID: 17674179
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Men's, but not women's, sociosexual orientation predicts couples' perceptions of sexually dimorphic cues in own-sex faces.
    Kandrik M; Fincher CL; Jones BC; DeBruine LM
    Arch Sex Behav; 2014 Jul; 43(5):965-71. PubMed ID: 24366658
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Do women's mate preferences change across the ovulatory cycle? A meta-analytic review.
    Gildersleeve K; Haselton MG; Fales MR
    Psychol Bull; 2014 Sep; 140(5):1205-59. PubMed ID: 24564172
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.