These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
242 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28922303)
1. Perioperative Outcomes, Complications, and Efficacy of Robotic-Assisted Prolapse Repair: A Single Institution Study of 196 Patients. Gupta P; Ehlert M; Bartley J; Gilleran J; Killinger KA; Boura JA; Nagaraju P; Fischer M Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg; 2018; 24(6):408-411. PubMed ID: 28922303 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Robotic laparoendoscopic single-site compared with robotic multi-port sacrocolpopexy for apical compartment prolapse. Matanes E; Boulus S; Lauterbach R; Amit A; Weiner Z; Lowenstein L Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2020 Apr; 222(4):358.e1-358.e11. PubMed ID: 31589864 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Robotic sacrocolpopexy for the management of pelvic organ prolapse: a review of midterm surgical and quality of life outcomes. Barboglio PG; Toler AJ; Triaca V Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg; 2014; 20(1):38-43. PubMed ID: 24368487 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Intraoperative Complications and Perioperative and Surgical Outcomes of Single-Port Robotics-Assisted Sacrocolpopexy. Oh S; Yi J; Song AY; Jee J; Bae N; Shin JH Int Urogynecol J; 2024 Jul; 35(7):1521-1526. PubMed ID: 38900162 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparing laparoscopic and robotic sacrocolpopexy surgical outcomes with prior versus concomitant hysterectomy. Dubinskaya A; Hernandez-Aranda D; Wakefield DB; Shepherd JP Int Urogynecol J; 2020 Feb; 31(2):401-407. PubMed ID: 31256223 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Perioperative, postoperative and anatomical outcomes of robotic sacrocolpopexy. Kilic GS; Lee T; Lewis K; Demirkiran C; Dursun F; Unlu BS J Obstet Gynaecol; 2021 May; 41(4):651-654. PubMed ID: 33045854 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Reoperation After Robotic and Vaginal Mesh Reconstructive Surgery: A Retrospective Cohort Study. Martin LA; Calixte R; Finamore PS Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg; 2015; 21(6):315-8. PubMed ID: 26506158 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Anchor vs suture for the attachment of vaginal mesh in a robotic-assisted sacrocolpopexy: a randomized clinical trial. Berger AA; Tan-Kim J; Menefee SA Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2020 Aug; 223(2):258.e1-258.e8. PubMed ID: 32413431 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Long-term quality of life outcomes and retreatment rates after robotic sacrocolpopexy. Linder BJ; Chow GK; Elliott DS Int J Urol; 2015 Dec; 22(12):1155-8. PubMed ID: 26300382 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. One-year functional and anatomic outcomes of robotic sacrocolpopexy versus vaginal extraperitoneal colpopexy with mesh. Jambusaria LH; Murphy M; Lucente VR Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg; 2015; 21(2):87-92. PubMed ID: 25185594 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Single Port Robotic Assisted Sacrocolpopexy: Our Experience With the First 25 Cases. Matanes E; Lauterbach R; Mustafa-Mikhail S; Amit A; Wiener Z; Lowenstein L Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg; 2017; 23(3):e14-e18. PubMed ID: 28134702 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Anatomic Outcomes of Robotic Assisted Supracervical Hysterectomy and Concurrent Sacrocolpopexy at a Tertiary Care Institution at Initial Adaptation of the Procedure. Prendergast E; Silver H; Johnson LL; Simon M; Feinglass J; Kielb S; Hairston J; Lewicky-Gaupp C Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg; 2016; 22(1):29-32. PubMed ID: 26680565 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Long-Term Outcomes of Robotic-Assisted Laparoscopic Sacrocolpopexy Using Lightweight Y-Mesh. Culligan PJ; Lewis C; Priestley J; Mushonga N Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg; 2020 Mar; 26(3):202-206. PubMed ID: 31688526 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Perioperative complications and short-term outcomes of abdominal sacrocolpopexy, laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy, and laparoscopic pectopexy for apical prolapse. Biler A; Ertas IE; Tosun G; Hortu I; Turkay U; Gultekin OE; Igci G Int Braz J Urol; 2018; 44(5):996-1004. PubMed ID: 30044591 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. First report comparing the two types of single-incision robotic sacrocolpopexy: Single site using the da Vinci Xi or Si system and single port using the da Vinci SP system. Lee SR; Roh AM; Jeong K; Kim SH; Chae HD; Moon HS Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol; 2021 Jan; 60(1):60-65. PubMed ID: 33495010 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Complications and clinical outcomes of laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy for pelvic organ prolapse. Sato H; Abe H; Ikeda A; Miyagawa T; Sato K J Obstet Gynaecol; 2021 Jan; 41(1):128-132. PubMed ID: 32148120 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Robot-assisted Vs Laparoscopic Sacrocolpopexy for High-stage Pelvic Organ Prolapse: A Prospective, Randomized, Single-center Study. Illiano E; Ditonno P; Giannitsas K; De Rienzo G; Bini V; Costantini E Urology; 2019 Dec; 134():116-123. PubMed ID: 31563536 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Concomitant trocar-guided transvaginal mesh surgery with a midurethral sling in treating advanced pelvic organ prolapse associated with stress or occult stress urinary incontinence. Wu CJ; Chuang FC; Chu LC; Kung FT; Huang KH; Wu MP Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol; 2013 Dec; 52(4):516-22. PubMed ID: 24411036 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. What to Do With Recurrent Prolapse After Vaginal Mesh Failure? Norinho de Oliveira P; Bourdel N; Rabischong B; Canis M; Botchorishvili R J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2016 Feb; 23(2):161-2. PubMed ID: 26408228 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]