These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
165 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28922321)
21. Comparative study of surgical margins and cosmetic outcome in lumpectomy versus segmental resection in breast cancer. Eggemann H; Ignatov A; Krocker J; Neuss K; Elling D; John J; Costa SD Eur Surg Res; 2011; 47(4):231-9. PubMed ID: 22056494 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Aesthetic and functional outcome after breast conserving surgery - Comparison between conventional and oncoplastic resection. Ojala K; Meretoja TJ; Leidenius MH Eur J Surg Oncol; 2017 Apr; 43(4):658-664. PubMed ID: 28040314 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Why do women accept to undergo a nipple sparing mastectomy or to reconstruct the nipple areola complex when nipple sparing mastectomy is not possible? Didier F; Arnaboldi P; Gandini S; Maldifassi A; Goldhirsch A; Radice D; Minotti I; Ballardini B; Luini A; Santillo B; Rietjens M; Petit JY Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2012 Apr; 132(3):1177-84. PubMed ID: 22350788 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Skin-sparing mastectomy and immediate breast reconstruction: patient satisfaction and clinical outcome. Salhab M; Al Sarakbi W; Joseph A; Sheards S; Travers J; Mokbel K Int J Clin Oncol; 2006 Feb; 11(1):51-4. PubMed ID: 16508729 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Immediate expander/implant breast reconstruction followed by post-mastectomy radiotherapy for breast cancer: Aesthetic, surgical, satisfaction and quality of life outcomes in women with high-risk breast cancer. Brennan ME; Flitcroft K; Warrier S; Snook K; Spillane AJ Breast; 2016 Dec; 30():59-65. PubMed ID: 27611237 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Short term safety of oncoplastic breast conserving surgery for larger tumors. Wijgman DJ; Ten Wolde B; van Groesen NR; Keemers-Gels ME; van den Wildenberg FJ; Strobbe LJ Eur J Surg Oncol; 2017 Apr; 43(4):665-671. PubMed ID: 28041648 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Quality of life and satisfaction after breast cancer operation. Han J; Grothuesmann D; Neises M; Hille U; Hillemanns P Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2010 Jul; 282(1):75-82. PubMed ID: 19960349 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Increasing breast reconstruction rates by offering more women a choice. Wong A; Snook K; Brennan M; Flitcroft K; Tucker M; Hiercz D; Spillane A ANZ J Surg; 2014; 84(1-2):31-6. PubMed ID: 24450788 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Surgeon perspectives on surgical options for early-stage breast cancer. Thompson TA; Pusic A; Kerrigan CL; Sargeant R; Slezak S; Chang BW; Helzlsouer KJ; Manson P Plast Reconstr Surg; 2000 Mar; 105(3):910-8. PubMed ID: 10724250 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Quality of life over 5 years in women with breast cancer after breast-conserving therapy versus mastectomy: a population-based study. Arndt V; Stegmaier C; Ziegler H; Brenner H J Cancer Res Clin Oncol; 2008 Dec; 134(12):1311-8. PubMed ID: 18504613 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Lumpectomy cavity shaved margins do not impact re-excision rates in breast cancer patients. Coopey SB; Buckley JM; Smith BL; Hughes KS; Gadd MA; Specht MC Ann Surg Oncol; 2011 Oct; 18(11):3036-40. PubMed ID: 21947583 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Cost comparison of radiation treatment options after lumpectomy for breast cancer. Greenup RA; Camp MS; Taghian AG; Buckley J; Coopey SB; Gadd M; Hughes K; Specht M; Smith BL Ann Surg Oncol; 2012 Oct; 19(10):3275-81. PubMed ID: 22851048 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Aesthetic outcomes in patients undergoing breast conservation therapy for the treatment of localized breast cancer. Bajaj AK; Kon PS; Oberg KC; Miles DA Plast Reconstr Surg; 2004 Nov; 114(6):1442-9. PubMed ID: 15509931 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Breast reconstruction satisfaction rates at a large county hospital. Davis GB; Lang JE; Peric M; Yang H; Artenstein D; Chan LS; Schooler WG; Carey JN Ann Plast Surg; 2014 May; 72 Suppl 1():S61-5. PubMed ID: 24691306 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. [Evaluation of immediate breast reconstruction and radiotherapy: factors associated with complications]. Gross E; Hannoun-Levi JM; Rouanet P; Houvenaeghel G; Teissier E; Ellis S; Resbeut M; Tallet A; Vaini Cowen V; Azria D; Cowen D Cancer Radiother; 2010 Dec; 14(8):704-10. PubMed ID: 20674442 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Patterns of use and patient satisfaction with breast reconstruction among obese patients: results from a population-based study. Kulkarni AR; Katz S; Hamilton AS; Graff JJ; Alderman AK Plast Reconstr Surg; 2012 Aug; 130(2):263-270. PubMed ID: 22495206 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Three-dimensional simulation of aesthetic outcome from breast-conserving surgery compared with viewing photographs or standard care: randomized clinical trial. Godden AR; Micha A; Wolf LM; Pitches C; Barry PA; Khan AA; Krupa KDC; Kirby AM; Rusby JE Br J Surg; 2021 Oct; 108(10):1181-1188. PubMed ID: 34370833 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Sexual functioning in women after mastectomy versus breast conserving therapy for early-stage breast cancer: a prospective controlled study. Aerts L; Christiaens MR; Enzlin P; Neven P; Amant F Breast; 2014 Oct; 23(5):629-36. PubMed ID: 25082211 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Long-term cosmesis after lumpectomy and brachytherapy in the management of carcinoma of the previously irradiated breast. Trombetta M; Julian TB; Werts DE; McWilliams W; Kim Y; Miften M; Parda D Am J Clin Oncol; 2009 Jun; 32(3):314-8. PubMed ID: 19451803 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]