These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

98 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28922994)

  • 1. Two Attributes of Number Meaning.
    Wiemers M; Bekkering H; Lindemann O
    Exp Psychol; 2017 Jul; 64(4):253-261. PubMed ID: 28922994
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Reconstructing the origins of the space-number association: spatial and number-magnitude codes must be used jointly to elicit spatially organised mental number lines.
    Pinto M; Pellegrino M; Marson F; Lasaponara S; Doricchi F
    Cognition; 2019 Sep; 190():143-156. PubMed ID: 31079015
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Dissociating response conflict from numerical magnitude processing in the brain: an event-related fMRI study.
    Ansari D; Fugelsang JA; Dhital B; Venkatraman V
    Neuroimage; 2006 Aug; 32(2):799-805. PubMed ID: 16731007
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Spatial attention shifts contribute to the size congruity effect.
    Wang A; Pan Y
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2021 Oct; 83(7):2795-2805. PubMed ID: 34282561
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Developing number-space associations: SNARC effects using a color discrimination task in 5-year-olds.
    Hoffmann D; Hornung C; Martin R; Schiltz C
    J Exp Child Psychol; 2013 Dec; 116(4):775-91. PubMed ID: 24055929
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The underlying number-space mapping among kindergarteners and its relation with early numerical abilities.
    Chan WW; Wong TT
    J Exp Child Psychol; 2016 Aug; 148():35-50. PubMed ID: 27104240
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. SNARC for numerosities is modulated by comparative instruction (and resembles some non-numerical effects).
    Patro K; Shaki S
    Cogn Process; 2016 May; 17(2):127-37. PubMed ID: 26714804
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Congruency proportion reveals asymmetric processing of irrelevant physical and numerical dimensions in the size congruity paradigm.
    Borgmann K; Fugelsang J; Ansari D; Besner D
    Can J Exp Psychol; 2011 Jun; 65(2):98-104. PubMed ID: 21668091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Beyond magnitude: Judging ordinality of symbolic number is unrelated to magnitude comparison and independently relates to individual differences in arithmetic.
    Goffin C; Ansari D
    Cognition; 2016 May; 150():68-76. PubMed ID: 26851638
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Number to me, space to you: Joint representation of spatial-numerical associations.
    D'Ascenzo S; Fischer MH; Shaki S; Lugli L
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2022 Apr; 29(2):485-491. PubMed ID: 34816389
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. There's a SNARC in the Size Congruity Task.
    Weis T; Theobald S; Schmitt A; van Leeuwen C; Lachmann T
    Front Psychol; 2018; 9():1978. PubMed ID: 30450061
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Loudness counts: Interactions between loudness, number magnitude, and space.
    Hartmann M; Mast FW
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2017 Jul; 70(7):1305-1322. PubMed ID: 27109592
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Exploring the origin of the number-size congruency effect: Sensitivity or response bias?
    Reike D; Schwarz W
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2017 Feb; 79(2):383-388. PubMed ID: 28130715
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Bad-good constraints on a polarity correspondence account for the spatial-numerical association of response codes (SNARC) and markedness association of response codes (MARC) effects.
    Leth-Steensen C; Citta R
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2016; 69(3):482-94. PubMed ID: 26213330
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Interaction between numbers and size during visual search.
    Krause F; Bekkering H; Pratt J; Lindemann O
    Psychol Res; 2017 May; 81(3):664-677. PubMed ID: 27142070
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Transfer of magnitude and spatial mappings to the SNARC effect for parity judgments.
    Bae GY; Choi JM; Cho YS; Proctor RW
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2009 Nov; 35(6):1506-21. PubMed ID: 19857020
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. On the instability and constraints of the interaction between number representation and spatial attention in healthy humans: A concise review of the literature and new experimental evidence.
    Fattorini E; Pinto M; Merola S; D'Onofrio M; Doricchi F
    Prog Brain Res; 2016; 227():223-56. PubMed ID: 27339014
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Task instructions determine the visuospatial and verbal-spatial nature of number-space associations.
    Georges C; Schiltz C; Hoffmann D
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2015; 68(9):1895-909. PubMed ID: 25506656
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Paying attention to attention: evidence for an attentional contribution to the size congruity effect.
    Risko EF; Maloney EA; Fugelsang JA
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2013 Aug; 75(6):1137-47. PubMed ID: 23709065
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The size congruity effect: is bigger always more?
    Santens S; Verguts T
    Cognition; 2011 Jan; 118(1):94-110. PubMed ID: 21074146
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.